A ReprOctave collection comprising the Cat and the Voyetra-8 (mono and poly as repro-1 and 5) wuld be wonderfull. Lets pray!ghettosynth wrote:Do you own a Cat? The thing that's interesting with the Cat is that it is, AFAIK, one of only two non-modular monosynths with a 2040 based VCF. the other being the RSF Kobol. What would be gained from modeling the CAT, other than a cool as f**k odyssey like synth, would be a good model of the 2040 which would, IMNSHO, be great in Diva and/or ACE/SuperACE2000, or whatever it ends up getting called. The Cat is probably my favorite monosynth. In my opinion there's nothing as cool as FM modulation of a 2040 in software ATM.DuX wrote:Does everybody thinks the Cat SMR II is really worth emulating? You must be kidding me. It's just another standard 2 oscillator thingie. Booooooooooooooooooring.
I'm not a purist. I would love to see this Repro kind of pairing done again with the CAT. A mono/poly bundle, price at $149 out of the gate if you must, where the monosynth really pushes the boundaries and the poly variant gives people something that never existed.
Repro-5
-
- KVRist
- 234 posts since 24 Apr, 2004 from Patagonia
-
- KVRian
- 936 posts since 29 May, 2002 from UK
The future is both, because there's a market for both. RePro is mainly about focusing on a specific synth from the past (and sounds great in the process) but everything that U-He are learning along the way will go into the next generation of their flagship monster synth Zebra. So the one you want to watch out for will be Zebra 3DuX wrote: Enough of 2-osc analogue emulations with restrictive modulations, please! Take a look at modular synths - that's the future. No bounds on modulation possibilities!
-
- u-he
- 30188 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
No, but Cat SRM isDuX wrote:Does everybody thinks the Cat SMR II is really worth emulating?
Our concept for the Cat emulation was always based on the idea of adding all factory upgrades, which included a lot of patch points. And if we have patch points, we can add things to patch them through. In that respect, our Cat emulation would have been (and maybe will be) a modular synth plug-in.
-
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
klinik wrote:
A ReprOctave collection comprising the Cat and the Voyetra-8 (mono and poly as repro-1 and 5) wuld be wonderfull. Lets pray!
The 'pro1' part of repro1 is from the pro1 its emulating (and repro is short for reproduction)
Octave is the company name, so it would not be called 'reproctave' as its not specific to the model
recat maybe, but that sounds pretty stupid
-
- KVRAF
- 16728 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Take my money!Urs wrote:No, but Cat SRM isDuX wrote:Does everybody thinks the Cat SMR II is really worth emulating?
Our concept for the Cat emulation was always based on the idea of adding all factory upgrades, which included a lot of patch points. And if we have patch points, we can add things to patch them through. In that respect, our Cat emulation would have been (and maybe will be) a modular synth plug-in.
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
Yes, take my money too for this! You got me at the word modular.ghettosynth wrote:Take my money!Urs wrote:No, but Cat SRM isDuX wrote:Does everybody thinks the Cat SMR II is really worth emulating?
Our concept for the Cat emulation was always based on the idea of adding all factory upgrades, which included a lot of patch points. And if we have patch points, we can add things to patch them through. In that respect, our Cat emulation would have been (and maybe will be) a modular synth plug-in.
I hope one day the big masterplan is that Berlin Modular is U-he´s kind of better Reaktor and then all U-he synths are modules
-
- KVRian
- 538 posts since 23 Jan, 2008 from Hamburg, Germany
But I want Wifi connections between the modules. Cables are 2005.Cinebient wrote:Yes, take my money too for this! You got me at the word modular.
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
But that wouldn´t work at zero latencyBenutzername wrote:But I want Wifi connections between the modules. Cables are 2005.Cinebient wrote:Yes, take my money too for this! You got me at the word modular.
Virtual cables are fine until we reach the next step of wireless connection.
Maybe in 20 years. The same as bluetooth, still sucks in most cases.
-
- KVRian
- 969 posts since 5 Sep, 2014 from Heaven
^^ For anyone who hasn't heard the CAT ^^spunkmuffin wrote:
M O N O S Y N T H S F O R E V E R 
-
- u-he
- 30188 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
But that's just the SRM II, so the third revision. The second revision (SRM without any II) is the one IMHO that owns both the original Cat and the SRM II. The original Cat has a lot of personality, but also a bit of a cheap smell, whereas the SRM II is a tad overly polished with the typical moogy SSM 2044 sound. The SRM otoh...spunkmuffin wrote:^^ For anyone who hasn't heard the CAT ^^spunkmuffin wrote:
(I have all 3, so if we did a Cat it would be all 3)
-
- KVRAF
- 18358 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Make it 8 voices and call it OctoTabby.AnX wrote:klinik wrote:
A ReprOctave collection comprising the Cat and the Voyetra-8 (mono and poly as repro-1 and 5) wuld be wonderfull. Lets pray!
The 'pro1' part of repro1 is from the pro1 its emulating (and repro is short for reproduction)
Octave is the company name, so it would not be called 'reproctave' as its not specific to the model
recat maybe, but that sounds pretty stupid
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRAF
- 18358 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
Pussynth.egbert wrote:Tabby Galore
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~