u-he

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 8:38 am

stardustmedia wrote:
Ingonator wrote:Maybe not in Prophet 5 but the Prophet 10 included a step sequencer:

Next thing I need to buy is a Prophet-10. Will fit my Model D perfectly

If you like the Prophet 10 this video is very nice IMO (like most videos from MrFirechild):

stardustmedia · Post by **stardustmedia** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 8:38 am

Urs wrote:
memyselfandi wrote:But what a huge shame, my main reason for using the Repro-1 is the Sequencer. I am a lot less excited about the Repro-5 now
The main reason we made Repro-5 is polyphony. There's no need for a sequencer in it as Repro-1 already has one.

Wait until too many customers whine and cry, and you'll start to rethink about it... happend with the polyphony-whining with the release of Repro-1, which lead to Repro-5 (not complaining about that though

)

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 8:38 am

FOR f**k SAKE STOP SENDING REPORTS.

(there is no discussion function in the post report interface here... you can send me long messages all you like, I have no means to tell you how I feel about it. Hence I will decline to be dragged into your little games and I wrote above what exactly I will deal with)

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 8:39 am

mholloway wrote:It's so weird how mean and vile a place for talking about SYNTHESIZERS can get. Jeebus.

+1

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 8:45 am

Greggers wrote:
I am not going to make a patch, because...
@HunterKiller you are all small talk and excuses, still. every time I call you out, you enable Bernie Sanders and hide under a rock. all talk, no action. this was the third time you did it. I think you've embarrassed yourself just enough, yet I call you out again. but the deal is now fresh. when you make OOMT patch for Repro-5 as if you were a freaking Richard Wright himself doing it for the Floyd record in 1979, no less, then you calling Walter's and my takes "horrible" will be deemed fair and justified. then I will know what you're about. do it and prove it, talk is small. until then, save your breath and save your excuses. I don't care. patch or bust. and make damn sure that patch is a bloody masterpiece. adios hombre!

With that attitude I think you lost your entitlement for an apology from Hunterkiller. His post was shit, but so is yours.

Can we please move on now? I feel intrigued to delete any further of this shit. I usually don't delete posts when people make a dick out of themselves, but I will if this continues.

At this very moment the well being of u-he depends on this thread. This is the thread we discuss a new product in. The f**king BS that you entitled individuals throw at each other is completely the opposite of "good for us". It's just vile, mean bullshit. Something we don't stand for and something I will not tolerate any further.

Garrincha · Post by **Garrincha** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 8:53 am

Ingonator wrote: With a step sequencer you could transpose the pitch in realtime by playing keys (like in the video) so using your host is no replacement...

In Cubase try the Step-Designer MIDI-Plugin. Sonar used to have a similar thing and I remeber vaguely from my time with Logic 20 years ago that it has such a possibility as well.

I really don't think Repro-5 needs another step-sequencer at this point.

EvilDragon · Post by **EvilDragon** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:05 am

Yeah, you can always use an external sequencer to drive whatever patch you want.

ATN69 · Post by **ATN69** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:05 am

Just stopped by to say how much I enjoy Repro 5. I was born -69 and I grew up with the synths from the 70's and 80's. All though I owned a few over the years together with my older brother, there were a few we simply could not afford. It's amazing that in this day and age it's possible to squeeze such synth's into a computer and get the same vibe and sounds as back then, and the cost of it it's just a fraction of the hardware

hakey · Post by **hakey** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:06 am

Have you tried the 'Ideal' Osc type?

I have now.

+0.51 for the first Osc is close or possibly the same tuning as Osc 2 and, unlike P5 type, all voices appear to be tuned identically.

if a totally sterile sound is desired, that could be one way to get there.

AnX, if that's what you got, you were right (but you could have just said 'try this').

AnX · Post by **AnX** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:19 am

Ingonator wrote:
AnX wrote:Your host has a sequencer...
With a step sequencer you could transpose the pitch in realtime by playing keys (like in the video) so using your host is no replacement...

WIth a recording you might substitute a step sequuencer with a piano roll of your host but not when playing in real-time.

...or play it realtime...

actually play an instrument ?

Never!

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:34 am

Garrincha wrote:
Ingonator wrote: With a step sequencer you could transpose the pitch in realtime by playing keys (like in the video) so using your host is no replacement...
In Cubase try the Step-Designer MIDI-Plugin. Sonar used to have a similar thing and I remeber vaguely from my time with Logic 20 years ago that it has such a possibility as well.

I really don't think Repro-5 needs another step-sequencer at this point.

Well personally i got a few options for using an external step sequencer (including e.g. Max4Live plugins in Live 9 and my Novation Bass Station 2 that you send out MIDi data of it's Arp and step sequencer) but the point was that the Prophet 10 had a built-in step sequencer so having one built-in could actually make sense.

pdxindy · Post by **pdxindy** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:38 am

Ingonator wrote:
AnX wrote:Your host has a sequencer...
With a step sequencer you could transpose the pitch in realtime by playing keys (like in the video) so using your host is no replacement...

I can do that in my host...

ghettosynth · Post by **ghettosynth** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:39 am

Garrincha wrote:
Ingonator wrote: With a step sequencer you could transpose the pitch in realtime by playing keys (like in the video) so using your host is no replacement...
In Cubase try the Step-Designer MIDI-Plugin. Sonar used to have a similar thing and I remeber vaguely from my time with Logic 20 years ago that it has such a possibility as well.

I really don't think Repro-5 needs another step-sequencer at this point.

Yep! But, it does need 12 voices! It's rather a unique poly, so 12 voices just makes it that much better of a pad machine. I'm not asking for 16 or 32, just 12, that industry standard set by killer analogue pad machines like the JX10 and the Matrix12.

pdxindy · Post by **pdxindy** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:48 am

Ingonator wrote:but the point was that the Prophet 10 had a built-in step sequencer so having one built-in could actually make sense.

Yes, but this is RePro-5 not RePro-10... plus if the RePro-1 sequencer were added, it would not do anything that cannot be done with a separate sequencer already.

Ingonator · Post by **Ingonator** » Fri Nov 24, 2017 10:13 am

pdxindy wrote:
Ingonator wrote:but the point was that the Prophet 10 had a built-in step sequencer so having one built-in could actually make sense.
Yes, but this is RePro-5 not RePro-10... plus if the RePro-1 sequencer were added, it would not do anything that cannot be done with a separate sequencer already.

There was an external SCI Poly-Sequencer model 1005 (similar to that built-in with Prophet-10) to be used with the Prophet 5:
https://www.gearogs.com/gear/2613-Seque ... -Sequencer

It's not like this would be a "must have" for me in Repro-5 and that i do not have any options to do this with external plugins but to tell it makes no sense is wrong IMO (like having a polyphonic Repro-5 besides Repro-1 makes sense too...).

Almost all of the newer Dave Smith (DSI) hardware synths (both mono and poly) got a built-in step sequencer too.

u-he

KVR Audio

Repro-5 public beta (Repro V1.1)