Try experimenting with the number of threads setting in the preferences. I reckon that No. of physical cores - 1 is a good idea, so 3 threads on a quad core machine.PhilG wrote:In my case it feels just like the opposite.4damind wrote:Great and good to see an improved multi-thread/multi-core handling
Many 8 voice patches cause crackles here with a single note played.
Multi Core on/off doesn´t have a large impact.
3rd Gen i7 3630QM, 256 buffer size, Windows 10 Pro 1709 64bit
Repro V1.1 Release Candidate Rev 6780
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30218 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRist
- 65 posts since 4 Mar, 2012 from Mainz, Germany
Not in Cubendo land with Windows 10 and Intel, as far as I'm concerned.Urs wrote: Try experimenting with the number of threads setting in the preferences. I reckon that No. of physical cores - 1 is a good idea, so 3 threads on a quad core machine.
I run an older i7 3820 @ 3600 MHz (not really a whopping CPU by current standards) and I run Cubase 9.5 with Cubase' multicore option enabled. And even then Repro-5 runs best when setting it to 8 cores. With that setting I get 8 voices at roughly 30% of the ASIO-meter in Cubase. When I set it on 4 cores (which seems logical since I only have 4 physical cores) the same patch uses 50% and with Repro set on 3 cores I'm at 65% on the ASIO meter.
Bottom line: Repro seems to scale pretty well and it does not conflict with Cubase own MC-option. Looks like the multithreading is very well implemented in both, Repro-5 and Cubase.
Well done, Urs!
-
- KVRist
- 65 posts since 4 Mar, 2012 from Mainz, Germany
Another very nice easter egg in RC1 ist the addition of the 1978 factory patches. Found them when I was filtering by authors and saw "John Bowen" among them.
Did John finally gave his blessing to supply his own historic patches?
Did John finally gave his blessing to supply his own historic patches?
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
Urs commented on this here:Garrincha wrote:Another very nice easter egg in RC1 ist the addition of the 1978 factory patches. Found them when I was filtering by authors and saw "John Bowen" among them.
Did John finally gave his blessing to supply his own historic patches?
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=495500&start=30
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
Many thanks for the updates and the huge amount of factory presets.
I did not check all presets but i searched for a nice lush synth string patch i could use to layer with Arturia Piano V2 which i am currently checking too.
I found a preset from Howard called "HS Emo Strings" which is just beautiful IMO.
This is close to the sound i had in my mind for doing a synt hstrings patch in the near future but it seems to be difficult to do something better than this one (but of course i will do several strings patches too as Repro-5 is perfect for that, same about Synth Brass). The patch might not be super complex but complexity does not matter to make a patch sound great.
I did not check all presets but i searched for a nice lush synth string patch i could use to layer with Arturia Piano V2 which i am currently checking too.
I found a preset from Howard called "HS Emo Strings" which is just beautiful IMO.
This is close to the sound i had in my mind for doing a synt hstrings patch in the near future but it seems to be difficult to do something better than this one (but of course i will do several strings patches too as Repro-5 is perfect for that, same about Synth Brass). The patch might not be super complex but complexity does not matter to make a patch sound great.
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
- KVRAF
- 14477 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
Actually now I have gone thru all 900 presets and tagged my favourites on the PC it takes like 23-26 seconds.EvilDragon wrote:There's your answer.zvenx wrote:Not sure what is causing it though, my pc is significantly faster in theory than the mac, but update database takes 7 seconds on pc but less than a second on the mac.... Mac is on SSD though and PC isn't.
Certainly a workflow killer, for me anyway.
How come Repro-1 which had the same amount of presets didn't behave like this in the previous beta?
I wish it did like Abysnth and Massive which would scan the database after loading after showing you presets and working in the background.
rsp
sound sculptist
-
- KVRist
- 163 posts since 14 Aug, 2004
what does rsp mean ?
- KVRAF
- 24447 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Well that's serious... I don't wanna be a partypooper, but perhaps do a disk check? It might be starting to fail slowly. If that checks out, perhaps defrag the drive?zvenx wrote:Actually now I have gone thru all 900 presets and tagged my favourites on the PC it takes like 23-26 seconds.
Certainly a workflow killer, for me anyway.
- KVRAF
- 14477 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
EvilDragon wrote:Well that's serious... I don't wanna be a partypooper, but perhaps do a disk check? It might be starting to fail slowly. If that checks out, perhaps defrag the drive?zvenx wrote:Actually now I have gone thru all 900 presets and tagged my favourites on the PC it takes like 23-26 seconds.
Certainly a workflow killer, for me anyway.
Thanks......I did those and also did a blackmagic disk speed test. all seem normal.
I even disabled windows defender annoying real time protection.
I emailed the database to u-he.
thanks
rsp
sound sculptist
- KVRist
- 329 posts since 13 Nov, 2013 from Charlotte, North Carolina
Congrats on the release candidate U-he! I am having a blast browsing the new presets. At 96kHz/24 bit I'm listening to some serious mojo in Repro-5. You guys have done it again!
- KVRist
- 122 posts since 14 Sep, 2017
2013 Mac Pro 6 core vader helmet RePro-5 overall cpu seems a bit lower now (4 core default), but core 1 peaking more than others (Logic 10.2.3/Sierra). No use of hyperthreading.
Urs wrote:Try experimenting with the number of threads setting in the preferences. I reckon that No. of physical cores - 1 is a good idea, so 3 threads on a quad core machine.PhilG wrote:In my case it feels just like the opposite.4damind wrote:Great and good to see an improved multi-thread/multi-core handling
Many 8 voice patches cause crackles here with a single note played.
Multi Core on/off doesn´t have a large impact.
3rd Gen i7 3630QM, 256 buffer size, Windows 10 Pro 1709 64bit
- KVRian
- 710 posts since 7 May, 2002 from Phoenix, Arizona, USA
Depending on your host, you may be able to use a midi plugin before Repro to route your knob's CC to CC1 (modwheel).musichascolors wrote: 1. Would it be possible to midi-learn the mod wheel to a knob. I'm using my minilogue as a controller, and don't have a way to "midi-learn it" to anything. If I could route it to the LFO intensity knob, that would be great!
For example, there is the old but very good midi utility bundle that contains the vst "midi16CCrouter" http://thepiz.org/plugins/?p=pizmidi
Or if you use Reaper (or can use the JS to vst plugin ReaJS https://www.reaper.fm/reaplugs/)
then you can use MIDI CC Mapper.
Last edited by ericzang on Fri Dec 08, 2017 7:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 9526 posts since 6 Oct, 2004
How about the U-he sound-designers create a dedicated preset that
everyone will use for cpu/core/thread discussions, comparisons,
and for testing the many numeric options?
Maybe call it 'HS SamePage.h2p'
Cheers
everyone will use for cpu/core/thread discussions, comparisons,
and for testing the many numeric options?
Maybe call it 'HS SamePage.h2p'
Cheers
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30218 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Therein lies the improvement. The one core that does a little more work is the core Repro-5 would be rendering on if Multicore wasn't enabled. We give that one an extra voice to render, and some housekeeping on the voices that don't need rendering. This ensures (more or less) that all other cores have finished their job before this one is done.synth_punk wrote:2013 Mac Pro 6 core vader helmet RePro-5 overall cpu seems a bit lower now (4 core default), but core 1 peaking more than others (Logic 10.2.3/Sierra).
With the previous implementation we noticed that the main core had often been sitting idle, waiting for other threads to finish. That is part of the overhead I was talking about that cripples overall performance when too many instances have too many threads to work with.
You'll see a little more CPU on you DAW's meter than before but overall CPU increases far less, and very large spikes (e.g. when a mouse click or a UI draw blocks a thread for a millisecond or two) should be history now.
