Airwindows ButterComp: AU, Mac and PC VST

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Effects Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXx4yZlWxfk

TL;DW: Softest smoothest compressor.

ButterComp

Sometimes a plugin can be a sort of cult favorite. That's the story of ButterComp, a compressor of great subtlety that's no use for quite a few normal compressor tasks… but still has a fervent following. I've been begged for the new version of this one (not merely VST, but revamped with all the current Airwindows sophistication and purity) and I'm delighted to bring it, though I think it might puzzle some people. If the stock Logic comp would do as well, this isn't the plugin for you. But if you're looking for a certain thing and thought it unattainable in software, this might be your lucky day.

Buttercomp, under the hood, is absolutely unique (or unique, until I start working on variations and until other people try to copy it. They're free to, but it'll be possible to test that quite easily with special audio files).

It's a bipolar, interleaved compressor (with rather slow attack and release: a version with access to much faster dynamics is available in CStrip). This one's the original, the cult classic. What is a bipolar, or an interleaved compressor? For the purposes of Buttercomp, it's four totally independent compressors per channel. Two are sensitive to positive swing, and flip back and forth every sample. Two are sensitive to negative swing, also flipping back and forth every sample. The compression factor's reconstructed through combining these poles, through the screen of the interleaved compressors switching back and forth at the Nyquist frequency… that mysterious digital frequency that is on the one hand the literal highest frequency that can be encoded, and the lowest frequency that ought to be totally rejected and filtered out.

What happens is this: the tone of things gets some added second harmonic, wherever the compression is more strong on one side than the other. High frequencies take on a particular airy openness, since they too get second harmonic, plus individual sample spikes can only affect one out of four compressors: ButterComp deals with all samples only as samples relative to other samples, and doesn't get thrown off by isolated samples that don't represent the actual waveform. It's got a sound, but the sound is hard to define because of its extreme fluidity and purity.

If this sounds like your idea of fun, enjoy ButterComp. If you're looking for the 'all buttons in' mode, I'll get back to the drawing board and probably do something totally different for you. This compressor is not for everybody. Also, if you start slamming it really hard (demonstrated in the video), it'll volume invert: you can squish it down to become more quiet than the quiet passages, but still it will retain its tone quality. It's perhaps best used as a particular kind of 'glue' compressor, at which it is exceptional… or maybe I should say, it's unique. Start working with it and you'll soon work out whether you're part of the ButterComp cult. Not everybody will be, and it's only one type of sound… but nothing else can get that sound, and this is why I've kept this purest form of the algorithm available.

The people who love it, will be happy to see it brought up to modern-day specs and available as AU plus Mac and PC VST. And that's enough.

This work is made possible by Patreon, and my Patreon's doing nicely these days! If you can, jump on it at an equivalent to 'buying the plugins you love best, from me'. That might be $50 a year, or $100 if there's two plugins that truly rock your world, or simply $12 a year if Patreon stays viable at a $1 a month level. For me, working out rates based on 'plugin sales per year' turned out to make sense, and whether or not that passes more money through to me, it does help me in a big way. Among other things, I have more of a voice in the industry, and more of a voice with Patreon, if I turn out to be one of their viral success stories, and there's only one way that can happen. (you also get more and better plugins quicker, and the launch of my open source project, and those are good things too)

I've now told everyone reading this, how to code the unique ButterComp configuration of multiple parallel compressors. If all goes well, one day I'll also be giving people the code, and templates for building your own plugins (if you have a matching build environment to mine, and I can coach people on that), and the 'maker' movement can get off and running with countless ways to hack their own digital audio… with my blessing.

For now, I hope you like ButterComp. Next: the new Console plugins. But that's for another week…

Post

To call it "butter" is kinda understatement... it's an "Utter-Butter" :)

OTOH, it lets peaks through, too easily. so, a limiter/clipper/soft-distortion is advisable (at least with harsh drum synth material - ie. transient burdened)
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)

Post

Tp3 wrote:To call it "butter" is kinda understatement... it's an "Utter-Butter" :)

OTOH, it lets peaks through, too easily. so, a limiter/clipper/soft-distortion is advisable (at least with harsh drum synth material - ie. transient burdened)
Oh yeah, it's not in the least a peak limiter. If you hit it with sudden huge volume it'll even let a lot of that through while it's reacting. I'm not even sure how much it'll react to transient-heavy stuff at all, though you're free to try it. It keys off the body and solidity and density of the sound. I think it's like a 'glue' comp, but unusually smooth and grainless in texture.

It's the sort of thing where people go 'add this compressor, but set it to have NO gain reduction, none at all, and it's magic'. Except with ButterComp you might as well crank it to full compression and just gain stage gently into it, and it'll be pretty much that :D sometimes people don't use compressors to compress, just to impart tone and texture behavior (especially in the bass: I think ButterComp will do great things to the bottom octave, what with the '2nd harmonic adding' behavior.)

Also, you do seem to get about 3db gain out of the thing without even noticing it's happening. Maybe it's a good conditioner to go before some sort of loudenator? Try it into ADClip or NC-17 to see if it cleans up their acts :D

Post

Tp3, just put it on the 2buss and enjoy ;) ButterComp's always been a personal favorite, and I'm enjoying it even more now that I have a (much) better monitoring environment. Thanks Chris!
Computer musician / Ableton Certified Trainer / Mastering engineer
.com
3OP

Post

jinxtigr wrote:oh yeah, it's not in the least a peak limiter.
Never crossed my mind that it does such a thing.
jinxtigr wrote:If you hit it with sudden huge volume it'll even let a lot of that through while it's reacting.
I know :)
jinxtigr wrote:I'm not even sure how much it'll react to transient-heavy stuff at all, though you're free to try it.

It keys off the body and solidity and density of the sound. I think it's like a 'glue' comp, but unusually smooth and grainless in texture.
Density is the key word here IMO.
jinxtigr wrote:It's the sort of thing where people go 'add this compressor, but set it to have NO gain reduction, none at all, and it's magic'. Except with ButterComp you might as well crank it to full compression and just gain stage gently into it, and it'll be pretty much that :D sometimes people don't use compressors to compress, just to impart tone and texture behavior (especially in the bass: I think ButterComp will do great things to the bottom octave, what with the '2nd harmonic adding' behavior.)
Yes
jinxtigr wrote:Maybe it's a good conditioner to go before some sort of loudenator? Try it into ADClip or NC-17 to see if it cleans up their acts :D
YEP :D
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)

Post

jinxtigr wrote:Try it into ADClip or NC-17 to see if it cleans up their acts :D
That's a great advice.

Also : ADClip - shaves off the very top of your transient burdened material... then BC (@0.125) to BC (@0.25) to BC (@0.5)

I managed to coax 3 to 4 dB headroom in an utter-butter smooth fashion. that is, at this point in time.
I was about to give it a rest but it might still stay in the game...
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)

Post

Tp3 wrote:
jinxtigr wrote:Try it into ADClip or NC-17 to see if it cleans up their acts :D
That's a great advice.
Indeed.

I managed to get 5dB of headroom (?) in what seemed to me like a relatively clean fashion. maybe I'm wrong... dunno. (ADClip --> ButterComp @ 0.125 --> ButterComp @ 0.250 --> ButterComp @ 0.500).

I'll try NC.... NC :D (NC=And See)
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)

Post

OK this is getting ridiculous :help:

The above setup AND NC-17 ---> :drunk:
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)

Post

MOD PLS DELETE MY LAST THREE POST.

MISTAKE...
Last edited by Tp3 on Mon Dec 18, 2017 10:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)

Post

double post
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)

Post

DELETE THIS POST
Professional technicians are assessed by the abilities they possess.
Amateur technicians are assessed by the tools they possess - and the amount of those tools, with an obvious preference to the latest hyped ones.
(Gabe Dumbbell)

Post

Do you ever sleep Chris? :D thanks for this.
EnergyXT3 - LMMS - FL Studio | Roland SH201 - Waldorf Rocket | SoundCloud - Bandcamp

Post

Hi Chris,

Is there any way for this to have an output control perhaps in future releases (Though I can just use the CStrip). I mean, it would be of great help in gainstaging, nevertheless, this is a very good transparent compressor and it's turning to be one of my go-to-compressors.

Thank you.
Cockos REAPER | Win7 x64 | AMD A8 6600K Quad (3.9GHz) | G.Skill RipjawsX RAM (8GHz) | NI Komplete Audio 6 | Mackie CR4 | KRK KNS 6400 | Sennheiser MX 400 II

Post

Khaos Hellatron wrote:Hi Chris,

Is there any way for this to have an output control perhaps in future releases (Though I can just use the CStrip). I mean, it would be of great help in gainstaging, nevertheless, this is a very good transparent compressor and it's turning to be one of my go-to-compressors.
Dunno if there will be future releases of this in particular, but anything that takes the technology and builds it into wider-ranging plugins would get an output control. Maybe what you're looking for is 'next generation of ButterComp', which would be more adaptable and have the output control because you'd be able to do stuff that truly required it. ButterComp itself is the prototype and is more a glue thing, kept minimal (I did add dry/wet because it's a way to dial in even more subtlety for something that already excels in subtlety)

Post

Thanks, Chris. Looking forward to those. Rock on.
Cockos REAPER | Win7 x64 | AMD A8 6600K Quad (3.9GHz) | G.Skill RipjawsX RAM (8GHz) | NI Komplete Audio 6 | Mackie CR4 | KRK KNS 6400 | Sennheiser MX 400 II

Post Reply

Return to “Effects”