Linux public beta (4408)
-
- KVRist
- 304 posts since 9 Mar, 2017
I've tested the last two builds (6820/6821), Ubuntu 17.04, BitWig 2.2.3.
Indeed, the GUI is not working properly in VST2. I can edit, but the lag is very high and sometimes it misses mouse clicks, it looks like the it is not running. VST3 doesn't display anything.
I'm afraid the plugin GUI is not usable in this state.
Thanks for all the hard work!
Indeed, the GUI is not working properly in VST2. I can edit, but the lag is very high and sometimes it misses mouse clicks, it looks like the it is not running. VST3 doesn't display anything.
I'm afraid the plugin GUI is not usable in this state.
Thanks for all the hard work!
-
- KVRAF
- 9521 posts since 6 Oct, 2004
Groundbreaking work to overcome years of dubious
linux coding practices, or just finding better ways than what
was once considered necessary, or lots of both.
When it's ready, the path forward will be well marked,
and easier for the Cat, or whatever else comes out next.
Cheers
linux coding practices, or just finding better ways than what
was once considered necessary, or lots of both.
When it's ready, the path forward will be well marked,
and easier for the Cat, or whatever else comes out next.
Cheers
- KVRist
- 425 posts since 9 Nov, 2004
I am afraid these:abique wrote:Hello guys,
Next version to try: http://uhedownloads.heckmannaudiogmb.ne ... 821.tar.gz
Remember it is a testing build, not a production one.
Many thanks
- Do not show up in Reaper on Centos 7.4. (gkt2 2.24.31, gtk3 3.22.10)
The binaries are compatible with gcc 4.8.x? Ubuntu 14.04 LTS and Centos 7.x need that... please make it work with them!
- In Fedora 27 it is a blank GUI again. (gtk2 2.24.31, gtk3 3.22.26)
Last edited by David Else on Thu Dec 21, 2017 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRer
- 6 posts since 21 Apr, 2014
my results for 6821 (Arch, 4.14.6, nvidia-387.34, gtk2 2.24.31, gtk3 3.22.26) :
VST2: GUI is showing, but (as mentioned before) extremely laggy and not really usable. It get worse somehow if one tries to use the preset browser.
VST3: does not even show.
Anyway, thanks. I have to agree: what you (and u-he) are doing here is groundbreaking stuff.
VST2: GUI is showing, but (as mentioned before) extremely laggy and not really usable. It get worse somehow if one tries to use the preset browser.
VST3: does not even show.
Anyway, thanks. I have to agree: what you (and u-he) are doing here is groundbreaking stuff.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 816 posts since 26 May, 2013 from France, Sisteron
Yes VST2 will be a bit laggy :/ this all depends on the idle() call frequency from the host.
VST3 will be smooth but you need an host which supports the latest SDK, I've added that support to Bitwig, but for the next major release so you have to wait... a little bit I hope
I did some tests with Renoise, and I would say that it was not super smooth, but definitely usable to me. Did anyone try it with Ardour?
Many thanks guys
VST3 will be smooth but you need an host which supports the latest SDK, I've added that support to Bitwig, but for the next major release so you have to wait... a little bit I hope
I did some tests with Renoise, and I would say that it was not super smooth, but definitely usable to me. Did anyone try it with Ardour?
Many thanks guys
-
- KVRist
- 304 posts since 9 Mar, 2017
I've just tried; I am much afraid to say that the new version of Repro is unusable in both BitWig and Ardourabique wrote:Yes VST2 will be a bit laggy :/ this all depends on the idle() call frequency from the host.
Did anyone try it with Ardour?
[Ardour 5.11 btw]
-
- KVRist
- 176 posts since 29 Jan, 2015
Hello, I have installed the newest version now (6821) but I still have no luck. The plugins don't get recognized by the host. I also tried with Ardour but also no luck. So I thought maybe some kind of permission issue as they often occur.
I changed the group permission to my user like the other plugins are and also made the .so file executable. But still not working here.
I changed the group permission to my user like the other plugins are and also made the .so file executable. But still not working here.
Last edited by hihu on Thu Dec 21, 2017 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- 304 posts since 9 Mar, 2017
My guess is that those with less powerful computers could be the more likely to suffer the lag.
If that is the case, maybe the whole non-threaded approach is a bit worrying, as if the host is overloaded / busy even many other cores may be available lag will suffer, not to speak of having like 10 plugin windows opened.
If that is the case, maybe the whole non-threaded approach is a bit worrying, as if the host is overloaded / busy even many other cores may be available lag will suffer, not to speak of having like 10 plugin windows opened.
- KVRist
- 425 posts since 9 Nov, 2004
With the old VST3 version that did work, the MIDI learn never worked. If we will need to move to VST3 for super smoothness, I hope all will be well with the MIDI learnabique wrote:Yes VST2 will be a bit laggy :/ this all depends on the idle() call frequency from the host.
VST3 will be smooth but you need an host which supports the latest SDK, I've added that support to Bitwig, but for the next major release so you have to wait... a little bit I hope
I did some tests with Renoise, and I would say that it was not super smooth, but definitely usable to me. Did anyone try it with Ardour?
Many thanks guys
Have you tried with the latest Reaper Linux version https://www.landoleet.org/ , do you know if it supports what you need?
Are we all good with gcc 4.8.x? I am getting a pit paranoid about the u-he compatability, spent the entire week moving my main studio computer to Centos 7.4, it is working fantastically so far. They back port all the kernel chip-set compatibility and fixes, and the Gnome is very recent now too. It may have an ancient gcc version, but everything else is very modern.
Sorry to ask so many questions, it's just super exciting to be getting repro-5 on Linux!
-
- KVRAF
- 3729 posts since 3 Nov, 2015
I do not know about Ardour. But it does runs fine in Mixbus32C 4.3.19 released a couple of days ago. Same system as described previously. Mixbus32C is the so-called 'gcc5' version.abique wrote:I did some tests with Renoise, and I would say that it was not super smooth, but definitely usable to me. Did anyone try it with Ardour?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRist
- 304 posts since 9 Mar, 2017
Mevla, care to post what your system specifications are?mevla wrote: I do not know about Ardour. But it does runs fine in Mixbus32C 4.3.19 released a couple of days ago. Same system as described previously. Mixbus32C is the so-called 'gcc5' version.
It seems the problem we are having could be that the new version runs laggy in systems that don't have a super-powerful CPU.
- KVRian
- 1297 posts since 23 Jun, 2007 from Findlay OH USA
Greetings !
Here's what the latest Repro-1 looks like on BWS 2.2.3 :

Not so good. Repro-5 displays well but doesn't resize. Controls on R5 are sometimes unresponsive until I've tried them a few times, other controls work fluently with no "warm-up". I can select presets and the sound is good (to put it mildly).
Hardware here is an AMD FX6300 6-core CPU at 3.5 GHz, GPU is an nVidia GeForce 210 chipset. I'm using nVidia's binary driver, btw.
Best,
dp
Here's what the latest Repro-1 looks like on BWS 2.2.3 :

Not so good. Repro-5 displays well but doesn't resize. Controls on R5 are sometimes unresponsive until I've tried them a few times, other controls work fluently with no "warm-up". I can select presets and the sound is good (to put it mildly).
Hardware here is an AMD FX6300 6-core CPU at 3.5 GHz, GPU is an nVidia GeForce 210 chipset. I'm using nVidia's binary driver, btw.
Best,
dp
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 816 posts since 26 May, 2013 from France, Sisteron
Bitwig Studio 2.2.3 is not calling effIdle() on Linux. I'll repeat myself again, that will work fine with the next *MAJOR* update of Bitwig Studio, 2.2.3 was a minor update.
-
- KVRAF
- 3729 posts since 3 Nov, 2015
I already described the system a few replies back, although there were no hardware specs. Here they are:ejgallego wrote:Mevla, care to post what your system specifications are?
It seems the problem we are having could be that the new version runs laggy in systems that don't have a super-powerful CPU.
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz
16 GB RAM
M-Audio 1010LT audio card (if it matters at all ...)

