Urs, Repro5 is so good you should do a dedicated Roland JUPITER-6 next..
-
- KVRAF
- 5201 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
Berlin Modular all the way. Or audio rate modulation everywhere in Zebra 3. If it let me use OSC as source i would be happy.
Bazille and ACE are great but not quite happy with the filters and drive they offer in this area even if they sound great of course.
Bazille and ACE are great but not quite happy with the filters and drive they offer in this area even if they sound great of course.
-
- u-he
- 30216 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
From a business point of view we have to do Z3 and Diva first.Cinebient wrote:Berlin Modular all the way. Or audio rate modulation everywhere in Zebra 3. If it let me use OSC as source i would be happy.
Bazille and ACE are great but not quite happy with the filters and drive they offer in this area even if they sound great of course.
Also, I have become such a Eurocrack nut, my demands in terms of modular synthesis are extremely high, possibly beyond my ability to deliver in software.
-
- KVRAF
- 3057 posts since 6 Jul, 2013
Well you do enjoy a challenge..!Urs wrote:Also, I have become such a Eurocrack nut, my demands in terms of modular synthesis are extremely high, possibly beyond my ability to deliver in software.
-
dlarseninclusive dlarseninclusive https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=408358 - KVRist
- 295 posts since 19 Nov, 2017 from Los Angeles
Just got a visual of the Erica DIY kit, attached to a Sherman Filterbank... In a VST...beely wrote:Well you do enjoy a challenge..!Urs wrote:Also, I have become such a Eurocrack nut, my demands in terms of modular synthesis are extremely high, possibly beyond my ability to deliver in software.
-
- u-he
- 30216 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Why yes, from a business point of view we need to continue emulations. Repro is already our 3rd most sold product. It has outsold Hive and Satin by a few hundred, ACE by a thousand and everything else by several thousands of licenses. Only Zebra and Diva have a lonely head-to-head race towards the 20.000 mark, while Repro might scratch half of that next year (well, maybe not after going 149 bucks).
But, as with all things, even if we did a few more emus, it would wear off. It doesn't scale linearly. Repro already bites chunks out of Diva's business.
That said, my intention for future emus are very different from Repro. I would add a lot of crazyness. If we get to do the Cat, we'd try to add all the factory mods, and make the patch points routable through the stomp box effects.
If we did a SEM, we'd put the in one plug-in with Minimoog and make the SEM usable like it was supposed to, as a Synthesizer Expander Module for a Minimoog. We'd add a lot of patch points and make it crazy.
However. We can't do that now. Everyone needs a break from tedious work.
But, as with all things, even if we did a few more emus, it would wear off. It doesn't scale linearly. Repro already bites chunks out of Diva's business.
That said, my intention for future emus are very different from Repro. I would add a lot of crazyness. If we get to do the Cat, we'd try to add all the factory mods, and make the patch points routable through the stomp box effects.
If we did a SEM, we'd put the in one plug-in with Minimoog and make the SEM usable like it was supposed to, as a Synthesizer Expander Module for a Minimoog. We'd add a lot of patch points and make it crazy.
However. We can't do that now. Everyone needs a break from tedious work.
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
So RePro is a huge success? 
i kind of suspected that because its the only "right" Prophet emulation and for me personaly as a producer who badly wants a Prophet sound but do not want to have hardware synth ocupying studio space and making a hasle to work with, RePro is a no brainer
i kind of suspected that because its the only "right" Prophet emulation and for me personaly as a producer who badly wants a Prophet sound but do not want to have hardware synth ocupying studio space and making a hasle to work with, RePro is a no brainer -
- u-he
- 30216 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yep, every new product has started more successful than any prior product, but sales slow down quickly after a few weeks. However, Repro has continued to sell more than anything else within its first year, ever since we announced Repro-5. Before that announcement Repro-1 fell behind Diva and Zebra in sales.Elektronisch wrote:So RePro is a huge success?
It's complex.
-
- u-he
- 30216 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hell yes, it's also the first filter I'm gonna put into Z3 (replaces LP Allround)egbert101 wrote:Glad the SEM idea is still alive.
-
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
I've yet to see a 'the filter/oscillators/envelope/tiny detail etc doesn't sound like my Prophet' comment, which must be a first for such an emulation.Elektronisch wrote:So RePro is a huge success? i kind of suspected that because its the only "right" Prophet emulation
-
- u-he
- 30216 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Hehehe, there are shiploads of those from people who apparently don't own a Prophet-5.hakey wrote:I've yet to see a 'the filter/oscillators/envelope/tiny detail etc doesn't sound like my Prophet' comment, which must be a first for such an emulation.Elektronisch wrote:So RePro is a huge success? i kind of suspected that because its the only "right" Prophet emulation
-
- KVRist
- 276 posts since 12 Nov, 2011
A SEM on top of a Minimoog with patchpoints is a lot of synth, but people would still demand polyphonyUrs wrote: If we did a SEM, we'd put the in one plug-in with Minimoog and make the SEM usable like it was supposed to, as a Synthesizer Expander Module for a Minimoog. We'd add a lot of patch points and make it crazy.
-
- u-he
- 30216 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yeah, that's the trouble.knowix wrote:A SEM on top of a Minimoog with patchpoints is a lot of synth, but people would still demand polyphony