KVR Audio

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:16 pm

drez wrote:
Kriminal wrote:
drez wrote: Charlie Clouser only needed "Four Notes" in his demo tune he did for 2.5 and it crushes.
Who?
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=n ... ie+clouser

Thanks, but im not really that interested. Name dropping doesnt impress me.

plastique · Post by **plastique** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:18 pm

dr.wackler wrote:
h.vox wrote:somehow i came up with a theory that steinberg releases a major release every now and then just to come to the same number as logic or protools. logic is version 7 so it must be a lot better than cubase sx 3, right?
Cubase SX = Cubase SIX

SIX + 3 = 9 !

<klugsch-mode>
SIX + 2 = 8
</klugsch-mode>

quincy · Post by **quincy** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:19 pm

drez wrote:
quincy wrote:
drez wrote:
quincy wrote:
Aff wrote:Well i think Liam Howletts switch to Reason 'only' has had a detrimental effect on his music.

Read into that what you will
I don't think its the switch, i think he's just past his prime thats all.

There was frankly little chance he would improve on some of the stuff on "jilted generation", and he rarely has since.

I still think "girls" is a great track, nice and filthy
Reason has nothing to do whether that album is musical or not. That's pretty short sighted to think that Reason could make an electronic album sound totally crappy.

Would not the artist programming the tunes have anything to do with it? I mean, give me a piece of charcoal and some paper, and I'll give you a stick figure. But give those same tools to a great artist, and they can do things that I would never have thought of...with just charcoal!

Its not the tools, its the artist. Arguably, Liam's been "going downhill" for some time now, so I don't see how Reason plays into it. I happen to like the new album, so to each his own.
Thats exactly what i was saying you moron!

Well done for somehow reading the exact opposite of what my post meant! I'm saying that i think liam has had his best time, and it isn't now. Its got nothing to do with Reason, and thats was my point!

Sorry quincy, I was agreeing with you I should have stated that at the beginning. I was supporting your argument.

No worries mate.

Ignore my harsh words, i'm like that with everyone!

Armadillo · Post by **Armadillo** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:23 pm

dr.wackler wrote:
h.vox wrote:somehow i came up with a theory that steinberg releases a major release every now and then just to come to the same number as logic or protools. logic is version 7 so it must be a lot better than cubase sx 3, right?
Cubase SX = Cubase SIX

SIX + 3 = 9 !

No, it's 8. SX is SX 1, so SX 3 = 8

drez · Post by **drez** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:23 pm

Kriminal wrote:
drez wrote:
Kriminal wrote:
drez wrote: Charlie Clouser only needed "Four Notes" in his demo tune he did for 2.5 and it crushes.
Who?
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=n ... ie+clouser
Thanks, but im not really that interested. Name dropping doesnt impress me.

Its not name dropping. It has nothing to do with name dropping. Its fact that he created a demo song called "Four Notes" for Reason 2.5, he did it in an afternoon with his laptop at the park, and its a great demo. It would be a great demo if anyone did it. What's impressive is the song itself.

You asked if it could do more than one note. I'm stating that 1) yes you can and 2) it doesn't take alot of notes to make a good tune, just talent.

If your not interested, than why did you ask "who?"? Sounds like a question with the dead giveaway being the question "mark".

plastique · Post by **plastique** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:24 pm

plastique wrote:
dr.wackler wrote:
h.vox wrote:somehow i came up with a theory that steinberg releases a major release every now and then just to come to the same number as logic or protools. logic is version 7 so it must be a lot better than cubase sx 3, right?
Cubase SX = Cubase SIX

SIX + 3 = 9 !

<klugsch-mode>
SIX + 2 = 8
</klugsch-mode>

also: did Logic also make a jump leaving out one version like Cubase did (from 3 to 5)? if not they're actually equal .

drez · Post by **drez** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:26 pm

quincy wrote:
Ignore my harsh words, i'm like that with everyone!

Oh I know...believe me I know

That's why I just wanted to clarify.

meister eder · Post by **meister eder** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:32 pm

Kriminal wrote:
dr.wackler wrote:
h.vox wrote:somehow i came up with a theory that steinberg releases a major release every now and then just to come to the same number as logic or protools. logic is version 7 so it must be a lot better than cubase sx 3, right?
Cubase SX = Cubase SIX

SIX + 3 = 9 !

no if they are Roman numerals

Never knew there is a "S" in Roman numerals.

ObsoleteAcc99 · Post by **ObsoleteAcc99** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:35 pm

[DELETED]

Armadillo · Post by **Armadillo** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:36 pm

plastique wrote:
plastique wrote:
dr.wackler wrote:
h.vox wrote:somehow i came up with a theory that steinberg releases a major release every now and then just to come to the same number as logic or protools. logic is version 7 so it must be a lot better than cubase sx 3, right?
Cubase SX = Cubase SIX

SIX + 3 = 9 !

<klugsch-mode>
SIX + 2 = 8
</klugsch-mode>

also: did Logic also make a jump leaving out one version like Cubase did (from 3 to 5)? if not they're actually equal .

Cubase didn't leave out 4. Only on the PC side. Mac had a 4.0, but PC went from 3.7 to 5.0 for some reason.

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:36 pm

dr.wackler wrote:Never knew there is a "S" in Roman numerals.

Remember the title sequence to the TV series "I CLAUDIUS," set in Imperial Rome?

There's the S. :-) By the way, I stood for badger (so would you), and X stood for mushroom.

Meffy

meister eder · Post by **meister eder** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:37 pm

Armadillo wrote:
dr.wackler wrote:
h.vox wrote:somehow i came up with a theory that steinberg releases a major release every now and then just to come to the same number as logic or protools. logic is version 7 so it must be a lot better than cubase sx 3, right?
Cubase SX = Cubase SIX

SIX + 3 = 9 !

No, it's 8. SX is SX 1, so SX 3 = 8

That must be the reason why I accidentally wrote "SIX + 3 = 8" first, and then quickliy edited my post!

meister eder · Post by **meister eder** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:48 pm

Meffy wrote:
dr.wackler wrote:Never knew there is a "S" in Roman numerals.
Remember the title sequence to the TV series "I CLAUDIUS," set in Imperial Rome?

There's the S.

Never knew CLAUDIUS was a number.

Meffy wrote:By the way, I stood for badger (so would you)

Meffy · Post by **Meffy** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:18 pm

dr.wackler wrote:Never knew CLAUDIUS was a number.

The S is the ssslithering, sssinuousss sssnake. :-)

Meffy

blacklory · Post by **blacklory** » Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:37 pm

assaftzur wrote:So here's the situation...
We got Live 4, Wavelab 5, Sonar 4 and Cubase SX 3.
What about those guys from Sweden? what's going on? Where is Reason 3?
'cause "Drum Kit Refill" is hardly a subtitute.

Ace

What is sorely missing from all of this on all host/intsta studio fronts is any real 3D graphics support or any online jamming or online environment support what/so/ever- Yep-> I am saying somebody send the Swedes and the cats from imageline to Texas to hang out with id software!

We need changes sisters, I want an online addition with a fully immersive, completely user modifiable, 3D space to jam in with you and others live and in real-time! Pick up the pace and connect us with each other and an online audience developers- People are playing games round the world with each other in cool environments while were still passing files and pressing CD's. Its lame the tech is there and the internet is too get on the ball!