[POLL] What next?

Official support for: bitwig.com
Post Reply New Topic

What do you miss the most?

Advanced tools in the piano roll (scrub, velocity ramp, chop, strum, stretch, etc.)
189
22%
Musical scales highlighting (per clip configurable)
100
12%
Chord/harmony track
64
8%
ARA(2) integration
45
5%
Automation clips including automation generators and modifiers
72
8%
Linked/ghost/alias clips
52
6%
Track comping
78
9%
Access to the modular development tool
66
8%
Video track
40
5%
Groove quantize with custom templates
92
11%
Other? (describe)
50
6%
 
Total votes: 848

RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Shor wrote:Freeze tracks. And no, bounce in place is not a good replacement for this.
How is freezing tracks FUNCTIONALLY superior to the options we have in Bitwig? Sure, it takes few more clicks, but bouncing a track, disabling & hiding it doesn't take THAT much more work.
Music tech enthusiast
DAW, VST & hardware hoarder
My "music": https://soundcloud.com/antic604

Post

antic604 wrote:
Shor wrote:Freeze tracks. And no, bounce in place is not a good replacement for this.
How is freezing tracks FUNCTIONALLY superior to the options we have in Bitwig? Sure, it takes few more clicks, but bouncing a track, disabling & hiding it doesn't take THAT much more work.
It does you bare right, its almost a macro; but given that it should be super-easy to implement and therefore a quick win for the Bitwig team and a time saver for those that freeze a lot.
X32 and 24C mixers, S88MK3, Live + PUSH 3, Osmose, RedShift 6, Pro3, S4, Tempera, Syntakt, Digitone, OP1-F, OPXY, TR-1000, Eurorack, TD27 Drums, Guitars, Basses, Amps and of course lots of pedals!

Post

SLiC wrote:
antic604 wrote:
Shor wrote:Freeze tracks. And no, bounce in place is not a good replacement for this.
How is freezing tracks FUNCTIONALLY superior to the options we have in Bitwig? Sure, it takes few more clicks, but bouncing a track, disabling & hiding it doesn't take THAT much more work.
It does you bare right, its almost a macro; but given that it should be super-easy to implement and therefore a quick win for the Bitwig team and a time saver for those that freeze a lot.
I don't think it's even a time saver at all.

Yes, the initial act of freezing is a bit faster. But when you decide to unfreeze, make a small edit and refreeze, then bounce is faster... For example, with bounce, you can mute the bounced audio and try something on the original midi. There is no time spent having to refreeze if you prefer the original.

So I think if you count the whole process, freeze does not save time. Bounce might even be faster if you edit frequently.

Post

Total touchscreen integration with gesture with more than 2 fingers.

Post

Freeze! Absolutely!

And not that shitty Ableton freeze but something like Reaper where you can freeze at the point you want inside the chain and have multiple freeze points per track.

Post

For me it would be a gpu accelerated gui first. So optimally only doing this first with the whole team.

Post

stamp wrote:(...)something like Reaper where you can freeze at the point you want inside the chain(...)
You can already do that using bounce-in-place, which bounces the device generating sound and leaves everything that's after it in the chain intact. Obviously - because this is Bitwig - you can put some of the effects into the FX slot of the instrument / VST and they will be bounced as well. To preserve the MIDI information just Ctrl+drag the clip to the Clip Launcher before bouncing.

You can also choose the bounce point when using regular *bounce* (just choose Custom in the pop-up window), but then you need to copy & paste the effects past the bounce point manually. Hope they'll automate that part.
Music tech enthusiast
DAW, VST & hardware hoarder
My "music": https://soundcloud.com/antic604

Post

Id also like a marry midi or keep midi for the bounce feature. If checked, as soon as you bounce the midi will be invisible but attached to the clip it rendered. To see it, you would just goto inspector or the midi and hit copy midi, or maybe shift cntrl c on the audio file, then youd have to paste the clip somehwere on the track.

And no the midi would not move with if you resized the audio clip, it will stay static. Even a full time second clip board would be cool that holds things like this.

Wait. A second clip board all the time would be genius.

Post

What antic said, just copy midi clip to the Clip Launcher before bouncing.

Code: Select all

https://youtu.be/M1Y1V-T-iXs?t=42s
-JH

Post

oh yea...thanks - Im terrible with that thing, never used it once. One day I will figure it out. I'm old school stuck in arranger

Post

I love the Bounce in place scheme in general, but would also find a freeze function useful. Specially if it is so customizable like has been said about Reaper.

Bounce (not necessarily in place) is a step forward when designing sound: you create a complex thing you like (CPU heavy creation), just bounce it and delete the making tracks. Sometimes it is just 2 seconds and won't need it anymore. Missing this in Live (choosing to apply sends, etc)

But when it comes to pad stuff or long musical stuff I miss the freeze function. I just want to click somewhere for it o be less CPU-hungry and I'm sure I will change something later on. Bounce in this case makes you occupie space and too many steps for me (renaming, rearraging, moving midi if it's "in place", etc).

Post

I chose "Other" - and my "other" is for a timeline that can display TIME and not only bars/beats. IIRC the way Ableton does it is by putting a separate timeline at the bottom. Other DAWs let you toggle the main view back and forth. I understand this is not so important for the EDM people, but for the composer / sound design / mix / work-for-hire people, we're always discussing the timing of certain events.
Bitwig 2.4 | Intel i9 7940X | Win10 | RME UCX | Focal SM9

Post

meta-redundant wrote:I chose "Other" - and my "other" is for a timeline that can display TIME and not only bars/beats. IIRC the way Ableton does it is by putting a separate timeline at the bottom. Other DAWs let you toggle the main view back and forth. I understand this is not so important for the EDM people, but for the composer / sound design / mix / work-for-hire people, we're always discussing the timing of certain events.
This, I've recently started to do work with video and Bitwig is very hard to use for this reason. I am using cue markers, but they are far from optimal.

Post

meta-redundant wrote:I chose "Other" - and my "other" is for a timeline that can display TIME and not only bars/beats. IIRC the way Ableton does it is by putting a separate timeline at the bottom. Other DAWs let you toggle the main view back and forth. I understand this is not so important for the EDM people, but for the composer / sound design / mix / work-for-hire people, we're always discussing the timing of certain events.
This, I've recently started to do work with video and Bitwig is very hard to use for this reason. I am using cue markers, but they are far from optimal.

Post

i wish we could save track types on the fly, with the device chains. Say I want to add a kontakt but route the midi to bitwig ... add>presets>tracks>kontakt and itll just put in the tracks and all the necesarry routing information i already have stored. That would definitely make life easier. 2.3 is the money version for bitwig its now too hard to ignore. Zplane is the icing.

Post Reply

Return to “Bitwig”