The VSTi That I Would Pay $1,000 For

VST, AU, AAX, CLAP, etc. Plugin Virtual Instruments Discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

I'm still waiting for a harmonica emulation that can sound like Bob Dylan.
If you have requests for Korg VST features or changes, they are listening at https://support.korguser.net/hc/en-us/requests/new

Post

And you know what REALLY blows my mind? Whenever somebody comes here asking for a sample library of whatever instrument it is they're looking for, all the discussion about the libraries being suggested revolves around the REALISM of the library. Everybody is looking for the most REALISTIC sounding sample library and complain about libraries that don't sound REALISTIC.

I don't hear people saying "Oh no, I can't use THAT library. It's TOO realistic. Shame on them for making it."

The hypocrisy is so deep that I wonder if half you people even listen to the shit you spew out.

Post

wagtunes wrote:I already said THREE f**king TIMES ...give me f**king piece of software that sounds like a real human
Look how difficult it is for your own avatar to sound like a real human
F E E D
Y O U R
F L O W

Post

I actually wouldnt mind myself a text-to-speech instrument or software like that would mimic at a vocal sample pack level for short takes as certain element.

But waga whats with all the nonsense ranting and awearing i dont get it. You need help man because i feel you have a personal problems and all this rage is jusy a reflection.

P.s. im writing from mobilw so sorry for writing mistakes

Post

wagtunes wrote:Waking up to this depressing thread, my only consolation is that some people are actually on my side.

And I already said THREE f**king TIMES that I'll give up the celebrity sound alike option. Just give me f**king piece of software that sounds like a real human singer and not like a Japanese anime cartoon.

FFS
So, after a night's sleep you thought the best thing to do was double-down on the arse-holery? :scared:

Like I said, you deserve everything you get around here. No more sympathy left for you :tu:

Someone please close this BS!

Post

el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:
wagtunes wrote:Waking up to this depressing thread, my only consolation is that some people are actually on my side.

And I already said THREE f**king TIMES that I'll give up the celebrity sound alike option. Just give me f**king piece of software that sounds like a real human singer and not like a Japanese anime cartoon.

FFS
So, after a night's sleep you thought the best thing to do was double-down on the arse-holery? :scared:

Like I said, you deserve everything you get around here. No more sympathy left for you :tu:

Someone please close this BS!
I do not want or need your sympathy, thank you.

Post

Cinebient wrote:
Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:I´m sure it will happen some day, also actors will be replaced by CGI and humans by A.I.
Let´s better enjoy what we have now since we are all obsolete (or dead) in some decades. :borg:
A bit offtopic Imo CGI can replace actors already. It could 10 years ago. At least for me.

I remember was watching Beowulf and up till the middle i noticed that its actually a CGI. At first i notice there was something weird about the movie but couldnt put it what was it. And its a movie that is 11 years old now :)

Anyway, carry on the discussion :)
Lol, i also was thinking about Beowulf. I mean it´s still far away from reality for me, especially on a giant 4K OLED TV (or whatever you prefer these days).
Indeed i think i often miss those fantastic costume and FX creator of the old times.
A lot movies are too much CGI and while it works good in the cinema i find it looks still too much fake at home. One of the greatest thing ever is still for me the transformation in American Werewolf. Maybe it will be the same with A.I. voices. New generations are impressed until they hear a real voice and wonder why no one is using it these days.
But dont forget Beowulf is 11 year old movie that came out in time when not that many poeople even had HD (720p) tvs so it was harder to see flaws :-)

I didnt see American Warewolf but will need to check that one.

I think good realisim example would be Peter Cushing reincarnation in Star Wars Rogue Squadron. I myself only got to know it was CG after i red how amazing it looked in an article. And it was after i saw the movie. It fooled me for sure

Also the creature in Shape Of The Water. The creature that doesnt exist (lol) looks so realistic that it just blows my mind. From the looks i would guess its animatronics but the animation shows it cant be. I gues creators did used the actor but i guess it was a combinatiob witg CG.

Post

Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:
Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:I´m sure it will happen some day, also actors will be replaced by CGI and humans by A.I.
Let´s better enjoy what we have now since we are all obsolete (or dead) in some decades. :borg:
A bit offtopic Imo CGI can replace actors already. It could 10 years ago. At least for me.

I remember was watching Beowulf and up till the middle i noticed that its actually a CGI. At first i notice there was something weird about the movie but couldnt put it what was it. And its a movie that is 11 years old now :)

Anyway, carry on the discussion :)
Lol, i also was thinking about Beowulf. I mean it´s still far away from reality for me, especially on a giant 4K OLED TV (or whatever you prefer these days).
Indeed i think i often miss those fantastic costume and FX creator of the old times.
A lot movies are too much CGI and while it works good in the cinema i find it looks still too much fake at home. One of the greatest thing ever is still for me the transformation in American Werewolf. Maybe it will be the same with A.I. voices. New generations are impressed until they hear a real voice and wonder why no one is using it these days.
But dont forget Beowulf is 11 year old movie that came out in time when not that many poeople even had HD (720p) tvs so it was harder to see flaws :-)

I didnt see American Warewolf but will need to check that one.

I think good realisim example would be Peter Cushing reincarnation in Star Wars Rogue Squadron. I myself only got to know it was CG after i red how amazing it looked in an article. And it was after i saw the movie. It fooled me for sure

Also the creature in Shape Of The Water. The creature that doesnt exist (lol) looks so realistic that it just blows my mind. From the looks i would guess its animatronics but the animation shows it cant be. I gues creators did used the actor but i guess it was a combinatiob witg CG.
And yet people have no problem with this. Star Wars uses a dead man in its movie depicting new footage but that's okay.

Yeah, the hypocrisy just gets deeper and deeper.

Post

wagtunes wrote:
Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:
Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:I´m sure it will happen some day, also actors will be replaced by CGI and humans by A.I.
Let´s better enjoy what we have now since we are all obsolete (or dead) in some decades. :borg:
A bit offtopic Imo CGI can replace actors already. It could 10 years ago. At least for me.

I remember was watching Beowulf and up till the middle i noticed that its actually a CGI. At first i notice there was something weird about the movie but couldnt put it what was it. And its a movie that is 11 years old now :)

Anyway, carry on the discussion :)
Lol, i also was thinking about Beowulf. I mean it´s still far away from reality for me, especially on a giant 4K OLED TV (or whatever you prefer these days).
Indeed i think i often miss those fantastic costume and FX creator of the old times.
A lot movies are too much CGI and while it works good in the cinema i find it looks still too much fake at home. One of the greatest thing ever is still for me the transformation in American Werewolf. Maybe it will be the same with A.I. voices. New generations are impressed until they hear a real voice and wonder why no one is using it these days.
But dont forget Beowulf is 11 year old movie that came out in time when not that many poeople even had HD (720p) tvs so it was harder to see flaws :-)

I didnt see American Warewolf but will need to check that one.

I think good realisim example would be Peter Cushing reincarnation in Star Wars Rogue Squadron. I myself only got to know it was CG after i red how amazing it looked in an article. And it was after i saw the movie. It fooled me for sure

Also the creature in Shape Of The Water. The creature that doesnt exist (lol) looks so realistic that it just blows my mind. From the looks i would guess its animatronics but the animation shows it cant be. I gues creators did used the actor but i guess it was a combinatiob witg CG.
And yet people have no problem with this. Star Wars uses a dead man in its movie depicting new footage but that's okay.

Yeah, the hypocrisy just gets deeper and deeper.
Different art forms has different cases and different requirements. You cannot resurect Peter Kushing from the dead to make a prequel for sequel that came out nearly 40 years ago.

Post

Elektronisch wrote:
wagtunes wrote:
Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:
Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:I´m sure it will happen some day, also actors will be replaced by CGI and humans by A.I.
Let´s better enjoy what we have now since we are all obsolete (or dead) in some decades. :borg:
A bit offtopic Imo CGI can replace actors already. It could 10 years ago. At least for me.

I remember was watching Beowulf and up till the middle i noticed that its actually a CGI. At first i notice there was something weird about the movie but couldnt put it what was it. And its a movie that is 11 years old now :)

Anyway, carry on the discussion :)
Lol, i also was thinking about Beowulf. I mean it´s still far away from reality for me, especially on a giant 4K OLED TV (or whatever you prefer these days).
Indeed i think i often miss those fantastic costume and FX creator of the old times.
A lot movies are too much CGI and while it works good in the cinema i find it looks still too much fake at home. One of the greatest thing ever is still for me the transformation in American Werewolf. Maybe it will be the same with A.I. voices. New generations are impressed until they hear a real voice and wonder why no one is using it these days.
But dont forget Beowulf is 11 year old movie that came out in time when not that many poeople even had HD (720p) tvs so it was harder to see flaws :-)

I didnt see American Warewolf but will need to check that one.

I think good realisim example would be Peter Cushing reincarnation in Star Wars Rogue Squadron. I myself only got to know it was CG after i red how amazing it looked in an article. And it was after i saw the movie. It fooled me for sure

Also the creature in Shape Of The Water. The creature that doesnt exist (lol) looks so realistic that it just blows my mind. From the looks i would guess its animatronics but the animation shows it cant be. I gues creators did used the actor but i guess it was a combinatiob witg CG.
And yet people have no problem with this. Star Wars uses a dead man in its movie depicting new footage but that's okay.

Yeah, the hypocrisy just gets deeper and deeper.
Different art forms has different cases and different requirements. You cannot resurect Peter Kushing from the dead to make a prequel for sequel that came out nearly 40 years ago.
So the ends justifies the means.

Yeah, that's a great argument.

Hypocrites.

Post

Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:
Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:I´m sure it will happen some day, also actors will be replaced by CGI and humans by A.I.
Let´s better enjoy what we have now since we are all obsolete (or dead) in some decades. :borg:
A bit offtopic Imo CGI can replace actors already. It could 10 years ago. At least for me.

I remember was watching Beowulf and up till the middle i noticed that its actually a CGI. At first i notice there was something weird about the movie but couldnt put it what was it. And its a movie that is 11 years old now :)

Anyway, carry on the discussion :)
Lol, i also was thinking about Beowulf. I mean it´s still far away from reality for me, especially on a giant 4K OLED TV (or whatever you prefer these days).
Indeed i think i often miss those fantastic costume and FX creator of the old times.
A lot movies are too much CGI and while it works good in the cinema i find it looks still too much fake at home. One of the greatest thing ever is still for me the transformation in American Werewolf. Maybe it will be the same with A.I. voices. New generations are impressed until they hear a real voice and wonder why no one is using it these days.
But dont forget Beowulf is 11 year old movie that came out in time when not that many poeople even had HD (720p) tvs so it was harder to see flaws :-)

I didnt see American Warewolf but will need to check that one.

I think good realisim example would be Peter Cushing reincarnation in Star Wars Rogue Squadron. I myself only got to know it was CG after i red how amazing it looked in an article. And it was after i saw the movie. It fooled me for sure

Also the creature in Shape Of The Water. The creature that doesnt exist (lol) looks so realistic that it just blows my mind. From the looks i would guess its animatronics but the animation shows it cant be. I gues creators did used the actor but i guess it was a combinatiob witg CG.
No, its a real human. The actor is wearing a sheath of foam latex with scales and a headpiece, different sets of eyes, an effects team controlling his fins and gills via remote control, and C.G.I. Like a real singer with FX.
F E E D
Y O U R
F L O W

Post

Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:
Elektronisch wrote:
Cinebient wrote:I´m sure it will happen some day, also actors will be replaced by CGI and humans by A.I.
Let´s better enjoy what we have now since we are all obsolete (or dead) in some decades. :borg:
A bit offtopic Imo CGI can replace actors already. It could 10 years ago. At least for me.

I remember was watching Beowulf and up till the middle i noticed that its actually a CGI. At first i notice there was something weird about the movie but couldnt put it what was it. And its a movie that is 11 years old now :)

Anyway, carry on the discussion :)
Lol, i also was thinking about Beowulf. I mean it´s still far away from reality for me, especially on a giant 4K OLED TV (or whatever you prefer these days).
Indeed i think i often miss those fantastic costume and FX creator of the old times.
A lot movies are too much CGI and while it works good in the cinema i find it looks still too much fake at home. One of the greatest thing ever is still for me the transformation in American Werewolf. Maybe it will be the same with A.I. voices. New generations are impressed until they hear a real voice and wonder why no one is using it these days.
But dont forget Beowulf is 11 year old movie that came out in time when not that many poeople even had HD (720p) tvs so it was harder to see flaws :-)

I didnt see American Warewolf but will need to check that one.

I think good realisim example would be Peter Cushing reincarnation in Star Wars Rogue Squadron. I myself only got to know it was CG after i red how amazing it looked in an article. And it was after i saw the movie. It fooled me for sure

Also the creature in Shape Of The Water. The creature that doesnt exist (lol) looks so realistic that it just blows my mind. From the looks i would guess its animatronics but the animation shows it cant be. I gues creators did used the actor but i guess it was a combinatiob witg CG.
But they still need real actors for the mimic and gestures. So it´s all a kind of augmented reality.
I mean just that often i find the old FX a lot more organic (analog :D ) than CGI FX.
But of course we live in times where technology wins over handcrafted things and maybe in some years it´s really that good that we couldn´t see fake sitting in front of a 8K TV.
But i think some also use a combination of these things which is great.
Maybe even A.I. can let us sing better than the best opera singers like Inva Mula as Diva Plava Laguna in the 5th Element.....who knows.
In the meantime i´m waiting for the next full moon..... :D

Post

We already have choir libraries to compare with string and brass libraries etc... What Wags wants is what they are working really hard on for robotics. Trying to make robots more life like. Maybe there is something that community has that can help him already? Probably not developed far enough at this point ... but

Post

Dasheesh wrote:We already have choir libraries to compare with string and brass libraries etc... What Wags wants is what they are working really hard on for robotics. Trying to make robots more life like. Maybe there is something that community has that can help him already? Probably not developed far enough at this point ... but
Maybe robots can replace KVR members soon :D :hihi:

Post

Maybe some members already are robots... can you tell the difference? :evil:

Post Reply

Return to “Instruments”