My main hosts are Live 10 and Cubase Pro 9.5 which both are 64-bit only. Still i could use 32-bit plugins in them with jBridge if needed.chk071 wrote:Except for the hosts which don't even have a 32-bit version anymore (Cubase, Reason, Logic, more to follow for sure).
Viper|1.2.2 update with bugfixes and new skin
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
- KVRAF
- 22998 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
I love the way people think JBridge is a 100% always works solution. Please tell that to the 32 bit plugs that I had to get rid of because even with JBridge they froze up my DAW. Hell, some of them wouldn't even load let alone work.Ingonator wrote:My main hosts are Live 10 and Cubase Pro 9.5 which both are 64-bit only. Still i could use 32-bit plugins in them with jBridge if needed.chk071 wrote:Except for the hosts which don't even have a 32-bit version anymore (Cubase, Reason, Logic, more to follow for sure).
Most worthless investment I ever made since going to PC recording.
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
For the time being, 64 bit Studio One + Jbridge + Viper mostly works fine here. I've already made and released a complete track with lots of Viper sounds in it.recursive one wrote:According to Adam, 64 bit is in progress and will be released any time soon
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
My OS (Win7) hasnt been updated for 7 years, my host for 3 years. No probs here with 32 or 64 bits.wagtunes wrote:That's assuming that in 10 years they're still making 32 bit hosts. If not, which is a distinct possibility, have fun running Cubase 7 when the rest of the world is on Cubase 15.AnX wrote:You can run 32 bit hosts on a 64 bit OS. Works fine on Win7 and 10. No bridge needed.wagtunes wrote:Yeah, true. 5 to 10 years from now, unless you've got spare parts laying around, good luck finding a brand new machine that's 32 bit. So pray your 32 bit machine lasts longer than you do because once that's gone, good luck running your 32 bit plugs "smoothly" without bridging, which is never a 100% perfect solution, which I found out the hard way. Almost none of my 32 bit plugs work without some kind of glitch, even with JBridge.Halonmusic wrote:Sure you can. I use 32bit plugins everyday.v1o wrote:64 bit is more important than Oxygen from the Amazon. You can’t launch 32 bit plugins in this day and age.
Sure, using that same argument, you can still run Windows 95 apps.
On the plus side, you won't have to worry about depending on any support from anyone because they won't be supporting 20 year old apps and OS.
A pc can easily run for 10 years without changing much, and no, never had a hardware problem.
I dont really care what version other ppl use. Doesnt affect my music.
-
- KVRian
- 1185 posts since 27 Apr, 2016
I think many Cubase 9 users have been enjoying hitherto unknown levels of stability since 32 bit was culled. This will make them very reticent to bridge. Unless it is essential many will not rock the cart of a happy DAW hardware/software combination.
-
- KVRAF
- 35676 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Alright, then it's even 4 of the major DAW's now. Dunno about Pro Tools, which might be 64-bit only now as well.Ingonator wrote:My main hosts are Live 10 and Cubase Pro 9.5 which both are 64-bit only. Schk071 wrote:Except for the hosts which don't even have a 32-bit version anymore (Cubase, Reason, Logic, more to follow for sure).
- KVRAF
- 22998 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Hey great man. But the day will come. You can mark my words on that. 32 bit will not be able to "realistically" serve you forever unless you start stocking up on parts now.AnX wrote:My OS (Win7) hasnt been updated for 7 years, my host for 3 years. No probs here with 32 or 64 bits.wagtunes wrote:That's assuming that in 10 years they're still making 32 bit hosts. If not, which is a distinct possibility, have fun running Cubase 7 when the rest of the world is on Cubase 15.AnX wrote:You can run 32 bit hosts on a 64 bit OS. Works fine on Win7 and 10. No bridge needed.wagtunes wrote:Yeah, true. 5 to 10 years from now, unless you've got spare parts laying around, good luck finding a brand new machine that's 32 bit. So pray your 32 bit machine lasts longer than you do because once that's gone, good luck running your 32 bit plugs "smoothly" without bridging, which is never a 100% perfect solution, which I found out the hard way. Almost none of my 32 bit plugs work without some kind of glitch, even with JBridge.Halonmusic wrote:Sure you can. I use 32bit plugins everyday.v1o wrote:64 bit is more important than Oxygen from the Amazon. You can’t launch 32 bit plugins in this day and age.
Sure, using that same argument, you can still run Windows 95 apps.
On the plus side, you won't have to worry about depending on any support from anyone because they won't be supporting 20 year old apps and OS.
A pc can easily run for 10 years without changing much, and no, never had a hardware problem.
I dont really care what version other ppl use. Doesnt affect my music.
- Banned
- 10729 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
You're missing the point. My host comes in 32/64 versions, both run in a 64bit OS. I dont need spare parts.
Hey great man. But the day will come. You can mark my words on that. 32 bit will not be able to "realistically" serve you forever unless you start stocking up on parts now.
I dont use 32bit, ive been 64bit only for 4 years or so (for work anyway). My point is, i could easily keep using any of my pc's for another 10 years without needing to update anything. I dont really need to update if i stay 64bit, as i have everything i need and its rock solid, but i'll prob buy a laptop this/next year for portability.
- KVRAF
- 22998 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
So then you're basically in the same boat that I'm in if I decided to use MuLab, which has a 64 and 32 bit host. The problem is this. If I want to use any of my 32 bit VSTs, I can. But then I can't use any of my 64 bit only VSTs in the same project. That means I can't do an orchestral based atmopsheric piece with sprinkles of HG Fortunes stuff to add that ambiance to it. They're not compatible within the same application. So it's one or the other.AnX wrote:You're missing the point. My host comes in 32/64 versions, both run in a 64bit OS. I dont need spare parts.
Hey great man. But the day will come. You can mark my words on that. 32 bit will not be able to "realistically" serve you forever unless you start stocking up on parts now.
I dont use 32bit, ive been 64bit only for 4 years or so (for work anyway). My point is, i could easily keep using any of my pc's for another 10 years without needing to update anything. I dont really need to update if i stay 64bit, as i have everything i need and its rock solid, but i'll prob buy a laptop this/next year for portability.
Not exactly an idea solution, which is why I don't bother with MuLab.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1238 posts since 29 Sep, 2004
Guy s please stop arguing about 64 bit, in a few weeks it will be meaningless to Viper 
http://www.adamszabo.com/ - Synths, soundsets and music
- KVRAF
- 22998 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
PITAAnX wrote:Render....
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
I guess they are doing it just for the sake of it. That's KVR for youadamtrance wrote:Guy s please stop arguing about 64 bit
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
- KVRian
- 538 posts since 31 May, 2015 from the Iberian Peninsula
The perfect solution is to use hosts with "sandboxing" and bridging, like Reaper, Bitwig... Which create another process that communicates with the DAW each time you load a 32bit plugin in a 64 DAW or vice versa. The sandbox executable can be either 32 or 64 bits and it does not matter, as long as it correctly communicates with the main DAW executable.wagtunes wrote:So then you're basically in the same boat that I'm in if I decided to use MuLab, which has a 64 and 32 bit host. The problem is this. If I want to use any of my 32 bit VSTs, I can. But then I can't use any of my 64 bit only VSTs in the same project. That means I can't do an orchestral based atmopsheric piece with sprinkles of HG Fortunes stuff to add that ambiance to it. They're not compatible within the same application. So it's one or the other.AnX wrote:You're missing the point. My host comes in 32/64 versions, both run in a 64bit OS. I dont need spare parts.
Hey great man. But the day will come. You can mark my words on that. 32 bit will not be able to "realistically" serve you forever unless you start stocking up on parts now.
I dont use 32bit, ive been 64bit only for 4 years or so (for work anyway). My point is, i could easily keep using any of my pc's for another 10 years without needing to update anything. I dont really need to update if i stay 64bit, as i have everything i need and its rock solid, but i'll prob buy a laptop this/next year for portability.
Not exactly an idea solution, which is why I don't bother with MuLab.
