Soundtheory GULLFOSS computional auditory perception EQ
- KVRian
- 1367 posts since 21 Dec, 2013 from USA
Go PC version!
-
- KVRAF
- 9589 posts since 5 Aug, 2009
mine too 
DAW FL Studio Audio Interface Focusrite Scarlett 1st Gen 2i2 CPU Intel i7-7700K 4.20 GHz, RAM 32 GB Dual-Channel DDR4 @2400MHz Corsair Vengeance. MB Asus Prime Z270-K, GPU Gainward 1070 GTX GS 8GB NT Be Quiet DP 550W OS Win10 64Bit
- KVRian
- 1367 posts since 21 Dec, 2013 from USA
Another month - any news? I'm not annoyed by the way, just want to try it!
- KVRAF
- 8037 posts since 28 Dec, 2015 from Atlantis Island
Before there’s a PC version a sale will happen (hope so!)...dandezebra wrote:Another month - any news? I'm not annoyed by the way, just want to try it!
https://sonograyn.bandcamp.com/music Experimental Ambient
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
-
- KVRAF
- 2108 posts since 31 Dec, 2002 from London, UK
The dev posts on Gearslutz, so I'd recommend anyone interested to follow this thread.
But yeah, no news about PC version yet it seems.
https://www.gearslutz.com/board/product ... 018-a.html
But yeah, no news about PC version yet it seems.
https://www.gearslutz.com/board/product ... 018-a.html
-
- KVRAF
- 9589 posts since 5 Aug, 2009
Anyone compared it with unfilter?
DAW FL Studio Audio Interface Focusrite Scarlett 1st Gen 2i2 CPU Intel i7-7700K 4.20 GHz, RAM 32 GB Dual-Channel DDR4 @2400MHz Corsair Vengeance. MB Asus Prime Z270-K, GPU Gainward 1070 GTX GS 8GB NT Be Quiet DP 550W OS Win10 64Bit
- KVRAF
- 8037 posts since 28 Dec, 2015 from Atlantis Island
Do they do sales from time to time? Shall wait for Black Friday, I guess... The normal price tag is a bit hefty....
https://sonograyn.bandcamp.com/music Experimental Ambient
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
-
- KVRAF
- 9589 posts since 5 Aug, 2009
crap, missed it, will have to check. thxFleer wrote:Did you see the elaborate answer on Gearslutz? Posted a few days ago.Caine123 wrote:Anyone compared it with unfilter?
are aall kvr people on gearslutz though??
DAW FL Studio Audio Interface Focusrite Scarlett 1st Gen 2i2 CPU Intel i7-7700K 4.20 GHz, RAM 32 GB Dual-Channel DDR4 @2400MHz Corsair Vengeance. MB Asus Prime Z270-K, GPU Gainward 1070 GTX GS 8GB NT Be Quiet DP 550W OS Win10 64Bit
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
I am not, and I also would like to see that answer too.Caine123 wrote:crap, missed it, will have to check. thxFleer wrote:Did you see the elaborate answer on Gearslutz? Posted a few days ago.Caine123 wrote:Anyone compared it with unfilter?
are aall kvr people on gearslutz though??![]()
Fernando (FMR)
- KVRAF
- 8037 posts since 28 Dec, 2015 from Atlantis Island
I am not as well, because GS is too confusing in it’s layout and topic logic.fmr wrote:I am not, and I also would like to see that answer too.Caine123 wrote:crap, missed it, will have to check. thxFleer wrote:Did you see the elaborate answer on Gearslutz? Posted a few days ago.Caine123 wrote:Anyone compared it with unfilter?
are aall kvr people on gearslutz though??![]()
https://sonograyn.bandcamp.com/music Experimental Ambient
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
- KVRAF
- 5622 posts since 23 Aug, 2014 from Boston/Cambridge
- KVRAF
- 11162 posts since 16 Mar, 2003 from Porto - Portugal
OK, here is what is written, followed with my questions:
“Gullfoss works by automatically adjusting its settings in real-time according to the audible features of the input signal, providing quick and precise fixes for issues that would otherwise be unsolvable or require a lot of time and experience to resolve.”
What is “fixed”, how and why? According to what principles? That’s what I’d like to know. They say nothing about that (or am I missing something?).
“While the technology behind Gullfoss involves intricate analysis and complex mathematical algorithms, Soundtheory has created an easy-to-use tool for everyone from the amateur musician to the professional mastering engineer. Its clean user interface offers a set of basic parameters that can be adjusted to improve the clarity, detail, spatiality and balance of a mix or recording in a matter of seconds. Gullfoss is even capable of fixing balancing issues between different sound elements without access to the individual tracks.”
The set of parameters is “clean” and “basic” indeed. Too clean and basic, I’d say. It doesn’t leave much control to the user. So, it’s kind of a hit or miss option. We either like what it does or we don’t. There is no middle term, IMO. My main critic is that it seems it will make everything sound more or less equal, according to the model they implemented. Everything is automated, standardized, out of control, and I wonder if it is this what we “really” want? Again, I may be missing something.
Maybe I'm being a control maniac, but that’s what I am questioning myself about. I'd like to hear your opinions on this.
“Gullfoss works by automatically adjusting its settings in real-time according to the audible features of the input signal, providing quick and precise fixes for issues that would otherwise be unsolvable or require a lot of time and experience to resolve.”
What is “fixed”, how and why? According to what principles? That’s what I’d like to know. They say nothing about that (or am I missing something?).
“While the technology behind Gullfoss involves intricate analysis and complex mathematical algorithms, Soundtheory has created an easy-to-use tool for everyone from the amateur musician to the professional mastering engineer. Its clean user interface offers a set of basic parameters that can be adjusted to improve the clarity, detail, spatiality and balance of a mix or recording in a matter of seconds. Gullfoss is even capable of fixing balancing issues between different sound elements without access to the individual tracks.”
The set of parameters is “clean” and “basic” indeed. Too clean and basic, I’d say. It doesn’t leave much control to the user. So, it’s kind of a hit or miss option. We either like what it does or we don’t. There is no middle term, IMO. My main critic is that it seems it will make everything sound more or less equal, according to the model they implemented. Everything is automated, standardized, out of control, and I wonder if it is this what we “really” want? Again, I may be missing something.
Maybe I'm being a control maniac, but that’s what I am questioning myself about. I'd like to hear your opinions on this.
Fernando (FMR)
