well obviously, but hes not skilled enough to use his ears!Unaspected wrote:
Good for him.
True or false?
- addled muppet weed
- 111304 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 37262 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from Scottish Borders
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
I was painted a kids ears blue with dykem in school, does that count

for most people who dont what dykem is

for most people who dont what dykem is
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 3086 posts since 4 May, 2012
Clearly, he is a very talented man. If he blocks up his eyes and doesn't accidentally give himself a hernia, maybe paint could come out his ears. Ideally, he'll want paint coming out of every possible orifice so that he can produce multiple works simultaneously.vurt wrote:well obviously, but hes not skilled enough to use his ears!Unaspected wrote:
Good for him.
- addled muppet weed
- 111304 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
surely the act in itself would be performance art, id pay to see a guy squirt paint out of every orifice.Unaspected wrote:Clearly, he is a very talented man. If he blocks up his eyes and doesn't accidentally give himself a hernia, maybe paint could come out his ears. Ideally, he'll want paint coming out of every possible orifice so that he can produce multiple works simultaneously.vurt wrote:well obviously, but hes not skilled enough to use his ears!Unaspected wrote:
Good for him.
ive seen worse.
-
- KVRAF
- 3086 posts since 4 May, 2012
Like a GG Allin tribute act.vurt wrote:surely the act in itself would be performance art, id pay to see a guy squirt paint out of every orifice.Unaspected wrote:Clearly, he is a very talented man. If he blocks up his eyes and doesn't accidentally give himself a hernia, maybe paint could come out his ears. Ideally, he'll want paint coming out of every possible orifice so that he can produce multiple works simultaneously.vurt wrote:well obviously, but hes not skilled enough to use his ears!Unaspected wrote:
Good for him.
ive seen worse.
But with paint.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 83 posts since 25 Jul, 2018
Let's put all your theories to a scientific test...
Step 1. Pull up an unmixed song.
Step 2. Turn off your headphones and speakers.
Step 3. Open up all your visual aides and tools.
Step 4. Mix the song using only meters, analyzers, scopes, etc.
Step 5. After you're done, explain how the song translates and makes you feel?
Now try this exact same test while you start a song from scratch.
Step 1. Pull up an unmixed song.
Step 2. Turn off your headphones and speakers.
Step 3. Open up all your visual aides and tools.
Step 4. Mix the song using only meters, analyzers, scopes, etc.
Step 5. After you're done, explain how the song translates and makes you feel?
Now try this exact same test while you start a song from scratch.
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
Sure.learnkeys wrote:Let's put all your theories to a scientific test...
Step 1. Pull up an unmixed song.
Step 2. Turn off your headphones and speakers.
Step 3. Open up all your visual aides and tools.
Step 4. Mix the song using only meters, analyzers, scopes, etc.
Step 5. After you're done, explain how the song translates and makes you feel?
Now try this exact same test while you start a song from scratch.
And let's follow it up with a second test:
Step 1. Pull up an unmixed song with your eyes closed.
Step 2. Open up all of your plugin instruments and effects with your eyes closed.
Step 3. Tweak the instrument settings and effects parameters with your eyes closed.
Step 4. Set up Microphones and adjust record levels with your eyes closed.
Step 5. After you're done, compare how long it took you to perform the first test with how long it took to perform the second test. Also note any injuries received from tripping over cords, cymbal stands etc.
Personally, I use both my ears and my eyes when playing, recording and mixing music. I tend to think that most people do. But everyone is different.
- addled muppet weed
- 111304 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
nah ill leave it 
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 83 posts since 25 Jul, 2018
Humans have a tendency to make up excuses where their logic fails.herodotus wrote:Sure.learnkeys wrote:Let's put all your theories to a scientific test...
Step 1. Pull up an unmixed song.
Step 2. Turn off your headphones and speakers.
Step 3. Open up all your visual aides and tools.
Step 4. Mix the song using only meters, analyzers, scopes, etc.
Step 5. After you're done, explain how the song translates and makes you feel?
Now try this exact same test while you start a song from scratch.
And let's follow it up with a second test:
Step 1. Pull up an unmixed song with your eyes closed.
Step 2. Open up all of your plugin instruments and effects with your eyes closed.
Step 3. Tweak the instrument settings and effects parameters with your eyes closed.
Step 4. Set up Microphones and adjust record levels with your eyes closed.
Step 5. After you're done, compare how long it took you to perform the first test with how long it took to perform the second test. Also note any injuries received from tripping over cords, cymbal stands etc.
Personally, I use both my ears and my eyes when playing, recording and mixing music. I tend to think that most people do. But everyone is different.
-
- KVRAF
- 3506 posts since 12 May, 2011
I didn't realise that archaic patriarchal booleanism still existed. I thought that had been eradicated long ago.
In todays enlightened society, I would suggest that true and false are simply social constructs and one should be allowed to assign any boolean value one likes. So the question is moot.
In todays enlightened society, I would suggest that true and false are simply social constructs and one should be allowed to assign any boolean value one likes. So the question is moot.
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
They also tend to think they have created a compelling argument when they are just making things up.learnkeys wrote:Humans have a tendency to make up excuses where their logic fails.herodotus wrote:Sure.learnkeys wrote:Let's put all your theories to a scientific test...
Step 1. Pull up an unmixed song.
Step 2. Turn off your headphones and speakers.
Step 3. Open up all your visual aides and tools.
Step 4. Mix the song using only meters, analyzers, scopes, etc.
Step 5. After you're done, explain how the song translates and makes you feel?
Now try this exact same test while you start a song from scratch.
And let's follow it up with a second test:
Step 1. Pull up an unmixed song with your eyes closed.
Step 2. Open up all of your plugin instruments and effects with your eyes closed.
Step 3. Tweak the instrument settings and effects parameters with your eyes closed.
Step 4. Set up Microphones and adjust record levels with your eyes closed.
Step 5. After you're done, compare how long it took you to perform the first test with how long it took to perform the second test. Also note any injuries received from tripping over cords, cymbal stands etc.
Personally, I use both my ears and my eyes when playing, recording and mixing music. I tend to think that most people do. But everyone is different.
But generalities aside, what is your actual argument? So far, I have seen nothing remotely resembling a logical demonstration.
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
I wasn't aware that it had ever existed.Googly Smythe wrote:I didn't realise that archaic patriarchal booleanism still existed.
What is (or was) It?
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
Me too. I trip over cymbal stands when my eyes are open. I have even sprained my feet on them. A music studio is no place to go about with your eyes closed.vurt wrote:nah ill leave it
- KVRAF
- 5703 posts since 8 Dec, 2004 from The Twin Cities
And to be honest, I always listen to music with my eyes closed. Frequently I turn the lights off. When I think I am done with a mix, I will definitely listen to it with eyes closed, just to concentrate on the overall sonic impression.
But I will be damned if I will adjust an eq's cutoff with my eyes closed. It makes no sense.
But I will be damned if I will adjust an eq's cutoff with my eyes closed. It makes no sense.