Is the Cubase SE engine similar to the one in SX2?

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

As Steinberg says they are going to phase out upgrades from Cubase VST 5.1 I sold some old junky gear and got a copy of Cubase SE.

It seems much improved from VST 5.1 and in fact is more advanced than several of that synth's features. It's more intuitive but still at times a click-fest.

Mind you, I use Sonar Producer 3 and am not thrilled about it's new feature set. For me it's a lot of money to upgrade to. It's on a "wait and see list".

Cubase SE has a upgrade curve which is better then none with 5.1. btw, what's missing from SE vs 5.1 VST besides a few cheesy VSTi?

thanks in advance
Reviews http://www.musicfaq.net
Selected tracks from new album TRAUMA :
http://netnewmusic.ning.com/profile/BSatinover

Post

it's a different audio engine. this should help:

http://pinnacle.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/pi ... ZT0x&p_li=

Post

Yeah, I have that on PDF but from a practical users standpoint is it a whole lot different in terms of look and feel?

I'm not sure what they mean about the audio engine, I assume that was a 2.x update which is mentioned in the list.

Honestly, the SE version sounds better than 5.1 VST.
Reviews http://www.musicfaq.net
Selected tracks from new album TRAUMA :
http://netnewmusic.ning.com/profile/BSatinover

Post

the only thing I would not like is the lack of a freeze, but Im sure its all the same codebase that is hamstringed by version...

Post

The comparison chart says it does not have the new 2.3 audio engine.

So I presume it does not have delay compensation which is a help in making it sound better.
Inasmuch as sounding different from anything in Windows 98SE, maybe the advantage is had by the software running in Win-XP ?

allen

Post

Cubase SE is build upon Cubase SX 1 not SX 2.

Post

Armadillo wrote:Cubase SE is build upon Cubase SX 1 not SX 2.
Bingo! I got it as well. I believe it was version 1.05, not even 1.06, but I'd have to load it up to check again. it is NOT SX 2.

Devon
Simple music philosophy - Those who can, make music. Those who can't, make excuses.
Read my VST reviews at Traxmusic!

Post

peppy197 wrote: So I presume it does not have delay compensation which is a help in making it sound better.


allen
that's a strange way of saying it. :?

Post

jens wrote:
peppy197 wrote: So I presume it does not have delay compensation which is a help in making it sound better.


allen
that's a strange way of saying it. :?
And wouldn't make a difference if you don't use aux sends.

Devon
Simple music philosophy - Those who can, make music. Those who can't, make excuses.
Read my VST reviews at Traxmusic!

Post

DevonB wrote:
jens wrote:
peppy197 wrote: So I presume it does not have delay compensation which is a help in making it sound better.


allen
that's a strange way of saying it. :?
And wouldn't make a difference if you don't use aux sends.

Devon
:? - whichever way: if you use a plugin which introduces delay and your host doesn't compensate for it (be it as a track-insert or as a send-effect) it will sound indeed terrible - so terrible that you can't use the plugin (if you don't help yourself with a trick which is only possible on inserts - there you go Devon :-) ) - but to say it degrades the sound-quality if your host doesn't support pdc is utter nonsense. :shock:

Post

Well, good.

Thanks Devon and Jens for the sensible engines. No offense to others but often I think some of us get hung up in very minor details and miss the question.

Now I know why SE seemed so fundementally different but also know that it's a nice little sequencer.

Anyone need a copy of Cubase VST 5.1 (manual, 3rd party book and of course Dongle? I'd prefer trades, but don't be insulting e.g. "how about a copy of LM4?" or "I've got a CD filled with SE synths and will transfer license on 2 of my $20 SE synths" nothing against SE or saleware SE, just illustrating a point. I support the SE community and like several of the payware synths.

I have no need for 5.1 VST but perhaps someone does?
Reviews http://www.musicfaq.net
Selected tracks from new album TRAUMA :
http://netnewmusic.ning.com/profile/BSatinover

Post

jens wrote:
DevonB wrote:
jens wrote:
peppy197 wrote: So I presume it does not have delay compensation which is a help in making it sound better.


allen
that's a strange way of saying it. :?
And wouldn't make a difference if you don't use aux sends.

Devon
:? - whichever way: if you use a plugin which introduces delay and your host doesn't compensate for it (be it as a track-insert or as a send-effect) it will sound indeed terrible - so terrible that you can't use the plugin (if you don't help yourself with a trick which is only possible on inserts - there you go Devon :-) ) - but to say it degrades the sound-quality if your host doesn't support pdc is utter nonsense. :shock:
We were talking about Cubase here with does compensate for inserts though. ;) No changing subjects in the middle! :x :lol:

Devon
Simple music philosophy - Those who can, make music. Those who can't, make excuses.
Read my VST reviews at Traxmusic!

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”