Melda Equalizers
- KVRist
- 282 posts since 22 Jun, 2018
Hey guys,
Have a question for y'all. How can I collapse the analyzer window to show me a shorter range of dB up and down but without zooming in? (So I can still see the levels?)
What would be great if that was possible, basically the spl meter (or just the loudness on the left basically) stretching while seeing only lets say +-6dB on the scale.
Many thanks
Have a question for y'all. How can I collapse the analyzer window to show me a shorter range of dB up and down but without zooming in? (So I can still see the levels?)
What would be great if that was possible, basically the spl meter (or just the loudness on the left basically) stretching while seeing only lets say +-6dB on the scale.
Many thanks
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Hey, Analyzer pane / Settings / Resolution 
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 282 posts since 22 Jun, 2018
Would be nice to be able to set a "default" for all eq's for example, even though it can be done manually within host.
Thanks anyways!
Thanks anyways!
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 282 posts since 22 Jun, 2018
actually, that didn't quite solve the problem I have... My problem is that a move of a node of let's say 1dB is almost hardly visible in the window and when I drag the node, it goes up way too quickly. I wish it was more sensitive (atleast from the start) - as let's say FabFilter provides.
Sound-wise, I prefer melda EQs, that's why I still didn't get the Pro-Q2, but this workflow problem I've got is becoming quite big to me
Sound-wise, I prefer melda EQs, that's why I still didn't get the Pro-Q2, but this workflow problem I've got is becoming quite big to me
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 282 posts since 22 Jun, 2018
For me this is literally the only thing bothering me about melda plugs, maybe aside drag'n'drop modulators in mpowersynth
-
- KVRAF
- 10376 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
As does the normalized view.
I have suggested to Vojtech that these views are uncoupled so that we can zoom in for more precision without losing the value of the other graphs, but it is not as easy / straight-forward as it seems.
I have suggested to Vojtech that these views are uncoupled so that we can zoom in for more precision without losing the value of the other graphs, but it is not as easy / straight-forward as it seems.
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 282 posts since 22 Jun, 2018
Yes, exactly so
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Fourstepper, shouldn't simply using fine tuning using ctrl + drag solve that?
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 282 posts since 22 Jun, 2018
Well the movement itself is not that big of a problem, but seeing approximately how much boost/cut was made is pretty hard at the moment, for example when mastering a song
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Ok then why won't you simply click once the zoom in for vertical axis?
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 282 posts since 22 Jun, 2018
Well because I would want to zoom in let's say twice and then the analyzer starts messing up
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Aaaaaha. Hmmm... Well no idea then... And to be honest I'm not really keen into creating more resolutions for the EQ graph. But perhaps the analyzer could be nonzoomable...? Will think about that.
- KVRist
- 254 posts since 21 Jun, 2018
Yeah that sounds like a great idea to have an option to make the analyzer nonzoomable!!
