Does Cubase 10 channel strip use additional cpu?

[dblock]

or is it already baked into the whole Cubase cpu cake?
I'm starting to rediscover the Cubase channel strip and If it's all the same I may use it more for channels than a bunch of cpu eating channel strips.
Are some of you of the opinion that it might be a bit underrated and is generally up to the task?

[alonl6]

depend on how many modules you are using. the eq is very light on the CPU.. but if you're using eq + compression and saturation than it will use more. However, it's a cpu efficient channel strip in my opinion.
I like it a lot. I think it's sounds great, very clear sound, and I don't feel any need to use something else most of the time.

[dblock]

depend on how many modules you are using. the eq is very light on the CPU.. but if you're using eq + compression and saturation than it will use more. However, it's a cpu efficient channel strip in my opinion.
I like it a lot. I think it's sounds great, very clear sound, and I don't feel any need to use something else most of the time.

Thanks for your input alonl6. That's what I was looking for. I'm trying to do some economical trade-offs with the strips so I can use some of my higher cpu plugins like my Acoustica Audio stuff and some Amp sims that are pretty hungry.