Yes, I agree I may have been hard. I have been sick all week with fever, so I’m more edgier than usual.jsp1979 wrote: Thu Dec 27, 2018 2:06 pmIt was the level of harshness that was unnecessary. One could have said: "I'm not sure doing that is a good idea. What were the stated conditions on the voucher?" instead of going straight to calling people digital thieves, connecting this to robbing a bank, and railing against them as using the same basis as modern day pirates.Insanelysane wrote: Thu Dec 27, 2018 1:19 pm
I dont know if it was 'unnecessarily' as there is an angle to what he argued, its just that there are many other angles to it and the whole issue was actually surrounding the moral dilemma of getting free sample libraries based on what felt like, to some, a loophole with the voucher use -and to others just normal use of a promotion.
I didn't buy a single pack with the voucher, but I did recall the email prominently telling people to use the voucher as often as they want.
If I had seen the email in the first place, my judgment of the whole situation would have been different.
When I posted that I was out, I went straight to bed. After that, I briefly woke up in the middle of the night, and when I found out about the email, I immediately apologized before getting back to bed.
Next time, I’ll be sure to get all infos before making a judgment call. Lesson learned.