Quick Question re OSC FX

Official support for: u-he.com
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Which oscillator effects have a setting that has no effect on the waveform/timbre?

Odd for Even = 0, Brilliance = 0, and Bandworks = -100 do this (I think?)

Any others?

Post

Confirming the three you posted null.

Filter = 0
Registerizer = 0
Scrambler = 0
Turbulence = 0
Sync Mojo = -100
Fractalz = -100
Scale = 0
Scatter = 0
ChopLift = 0
HyperComb = 0
Wrap = 0
Smear = 0

Post

Thanks. I could have sworn that some have a slight attenuating effect. Must have imagined it.

Post

yellowmix wrote: Fri Feb 01, 2019 8:47 pm Confirming the three you posted null.

Filter = 0
Registerizer = 0
Scrambler = 0
Turbulence = 0
Sync Mojo = -100
Fractalz = -100
Scale = 0
Scatter = 0
ChopLift = 0
HyperComb = 0
Wrap = 0
Smear = 0
On your list, I hear some volume attenuation in:

Scrambler at 0
Sync Mojo at -100
Fractalz at -100
Scatter at 0
Hypercomb at 0
Wrap at 0

Nothing scientific in terms of testing, but just hitting some bassy notes with some volume and alternating between those OscFX on and off.

Post

Try a null test against another copy of Zebra with the same waveform, make sure to reset the phase and turn off drift. I noticed the act of toggling FX while the osc is running could change the output a little bit.

Post

On its own, Fractalz =-100 doesn't attenuate.

With Odd for Even =0 in the first slot, subsequently adding Fractals =-100 in the second attenuates the output noticeably.

Two lots of Odd for Even doesn't attenuate.

What's going on?

Post

maybe it has something to do with the "normalize" volume osc? added: as I noticed in the past that even a very slight wave change can have a more drastic effect on the volume when normalize isn't set to 0

Post

Try the version we put up to export wavetables... I think that one had some work done... next official Z2 version will have fix for some strongly attenuated combinations of OscFX... (which never really made much of a difference with just a tad of Normalize thrown in - which is why I never figured that out before).

Post Reply

Return to “u-he”