I said, it wasn't likely to happen. That doesn't mean it wouldn't be nicetelecode wrote: Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:27 pmThere are already Jupiter VST's on the market in the form of Arturia's Juputer 8 V2 and the Jup 8 V3 and Rolands Jupiter 8 softsynth products. What would the hopes or expectations of an end user be in having yet another company make another VST based on the Jupiter synth?
Mainly, because u-he does emulations done right, at the level of detail they went into for Repro. Now, Repro is mainly the result of Urs' interest and passion in learning about synths and analog modelling at the time, and because of his personal interest in the Pro-1.telecode wrote: Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:27 pmMore resource friendly? A product that isn't quite an accurate homage to the Jupiter but a more modernized interpretation of the sounds? A cheaper alternative? Just wondering.
As I said above, the Roland plugin version is a good model, but usability is rather poor as they are still quite naive implementations of an interface, and CPU usage is high because they calculate the CPU based on all voices sounding at once, even if only a few (or none!) are sounding. Still, besides that, it does sound good. (The Arturia version is not in the same ballpark, here.)
*If* Urs had an interest in pursuing more recreations at some point, *and* if he was super into the JP8, that would be great, but, at least for now, he's indicated that his interests lie elsewhere. Besides, I think we're on the long-tail down-slope of modelled reincarnations anyway...
