Nor me - every one I have ever owned has been solid as a rock.jonljacobi wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 5:29 pm Hmm, I’ve had zero issues with AU in Live. But I never noticed any advantage either. The only real issue is cross-platform compatibility, which can be a pain, but is hardly an unsolvable issue. But I’d stick with the VSTs unless you’re using Logic which gives you no choice. Personally I try to work with the internal stuff wherever possible with Windows/macOS DAWs.
Ableton Live 10.1 now in Beta
- KVRian
- 1100 posts since 9 Jan, 2015 from NY, NY
Sweet child in time...
-
- KVRAF
- 4465 posts since 27 Jul, 2004
Am I the only one finding the new implementation in the render dialog a bit shortsighted???
I find lot of use for including the return channels but imho this doesn´t mean that I want (or better I mostly don´t want) to include the master fx too...
Shouldn´t there be 2 options... one for the returns and one for the master fx??
I find lot of use for including the return channels but imho this doesn´t mean that I want (or better I mostly don´t want) to include the master fx too...
Shouldn´t there be 2 options... one for the returns and one for the master fx??
-
- KVRAF
- 2023 posts since 23 May, 2012 from London
You're not alone, they should definitely be seperate options not combined as they are now.Trancit wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 5:07 pm Am I the only one finding the new implementation in the render dialog a bit shortsighted???
I find lot of use for including the return channels but imho this doesn´t mean that I want (or better I mostly don´t want) to include the master fx too...
Shouldn´t there be 2 options... one for the returns and one for the master fx??
Always Read the Manual!
-
- KVRAF
- 4817 posts since 17 Aug, 2004
Guys someone from you should raise this at their centercode where they discuss this. If it isn't raised yet.PieBerger wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 6:22 pmYou're not alone, they should definitely be seperate options not combined as they are now.Trancit wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 5:07 pm Am I the only one finding the new implementation in the render dialog a bit shortsighted???
I find lot of use for including the return channels but imho this doesn´t mean that I want (or better I mostly don´t want) to include the master fx too...
Shouldn´t there be 2 options... one for the returns and one for the master fx??
- KVRian
- 1280 posts since 26 Mar, 2004 from UK
10.1b13 out today, changelog has a long list of bug fixes; makes me think release not too far off.
ABLETON LIVE 12 & PUSH2
Soundcloud: Nation of Korea vs Shitty Dog
Soundcloud: Nation of Korea vs Shitty Dog
- KVRAF
- 1877 posts since 30 Mar, 2008 from MN, USA
10.1b13 fixed the crash when deleting certain VST3 plugins
I think you have that backwards. When you see only a few bugfixes, that's when to expect the final release. When there are this many, we have a ways to go. This is only the second public beta.
CLAP Software Database: https://clapdb.tech. KVR Discussion Topic.
-
- KVRian
- 1204 posts since 23 May, 2016
-
- KVRian
- 925 posts since 14 Dec, 2014
Offtopic, but since this is the only active generic Ableton Live thread right now:
http://www.maxforlive.com/library/devic ... freq-delay
Quite nice M4L pitch shifting delay device.
Also, tweaking automation with the Transform Handles is perceptibly smoother in 10.1b13.
http://www.maxforlive.com/library/devic ... freq-delay
Quite nice M4L pitch shifting delay device.
Also, tweaking automation with the Transform Handles is perceptibly smoother in 10.1b13.
-
- KVRAF
- 4817 posts since 17 Aug, 2004
That's really cool free device. Thankspottering wrote: ↑Wed Feb 20, 2019 8:27 pm Offtopic, but since this is the only active generic Ableton Live thread right now:
http://www.maxforlive.com/library/devic ... freq-delay
Quite nice M4L pitch shifting delay device.
Also, tweaking automation with the Transform Handles is perceptibly smoother in 10.1b13.
-
- KVRist
- 126 posts since 10 Sep, 2015
Well it's...............Interesting...
However, I'm still not feel for upgrading to Live 10. While new stuff is added with this 10.1 version, I still feel upgrading from 9 to 10 is only worth it for owners of the Suite version. Owners of the standard version have not much to gain for the rather high price for the update. For example: A lot of stuff and improvements is for M4L, but M4L is only "free" for Suite owners. Users for the standard version have to purchase M4L separately to fully take advance of the upgrade. If you add that to the already not cheap upgrade price, it's simply not worth it...
Anyway - I keep my eye on the developments in the hope it will be worth to upgrade for the standard version. Maybe if more futures are added later on it will make sense to upgrade, but not at this moment. Still - I see some good developments here.
However, I'm still not feel for upgrading to Live 10. While new stuff is added with this 10.1 version, I still feel upgrading from 9 to 10 is only worth it for owners of the Suite version. Owners of the standard version have not much to gain for the rather high price for the update. For example: A lot of stuff and improvements is for M4L, but M4L is only "free" for Suite owners. Users for the standard version have to purchase M4L separately to fully take advance of the upgrade. If you add that to the already not cheap upgrade price, it's simply not worth it...
Anyway - I keep my eye on the developments in the hope it will be worth to upgrade for the standard version. Maybe if more futures are added later on it will make sense to upgrade, but not at this moment. Still - I see some good developments here.
- KVRist
- 235 posts since 11 Oct, 2012
Is this finally going to have working MPE support or have they given up on this to support BW with new customers?
Some music with visuals and mixed tutorials related to game dev and sound design: https://www.youtube.com/@MetasideOfficial
-
- KVRAF
- 2023 posts since 23 May, 2012 from London
It's high up in the list and although Ableton have been very slow to respond to such requests they do seem to be churning them out now. With BWS hot their heels they're certainly under more pressure. My guess is that comping will come first, maybe in the next point release or point 3, because that is more likely to bring new revenue vs MPE which is still kind of niche, relatively speaking. I reckon we'll see MPE 10.5.
Always Read the Manual!
-
- KVRAF
- 4465 posts since 27 Jul, 2004
-
- KVRAF
- 1996 posts since 16 Jan, 2013 from USA
Hmm, I think the arranger is so visually cluttered and the mixer somewhat limited that comping still won’t attract the track-based crowd. MPE would seem to be a more likely add, to retain existing customers.
-
- KVRAF
- 2023 posts since 23 May, 2012 from London
It's the top requested feature in the beta forum by a considerable margin (411 vs 132 for MPE) and anecdotally, the most commented topic/request on any of Ableton's Live 10 posts/updates I've seen, with many people voicing that they are only hanging on to the likes of Logic/PT for comping. Vocals are still king as far as a lot of electronic music genres go (which Ableton obviously caters heavily for), more so than MPE which is still niche. In terms of revenue, it's not just plucking users away from the other DAWs it's about giving existing Live 9 (and Logic/PT/etc) users who need comping, a reason to dip into their pockets and part with (up to) £230 for the upgrade.jonljacobi wrote: ↑Thu Feb 21, 2019 3:57 pm Hmm, I think the arranger is so visually cluttered and the mixer somewhat limited that comping still won’t attract the track-based crowd. MPE would seem to be a more likely add, to retain existing customers.
Always Read the Manual!