Fads. In perfect alignment with 'Spiccato libraries' (the OP's other effort here); spiccato is a fad located in people with a very superficial sort of internet grasp of orchestral strings, related to 'media composing', 'trailer music' and is easy to talk about.
Does Melody Even Matter??
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
- Banned
- 2288 posts since 24 Mar, 2015 from Toronto, Canada
Of course it does. Especially in pop music and anything where the focus is a strong vocalist.fmr wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 8:21 pmSo, does melody even matter?Mobius wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 8:11 pm I think it’s an interesting topic and worth discussion. Melody is important in certain circumstances, but in others in may actually detract from the goal. It all depends on what you want to achieve.![]()
It's not my thing personally, but I was really impressed with what Zedd and a gazillion other writers did with the country artist in 2018. In this case the melody is front can center IMO.
Gear & Setup: Windows 10, Dual Xeon, 32GB RAM, Cubase 10.5/9.5, NI Komplete Audio 6, NI Maschine, NI Jam, NI Kontakt
- KVRAF
- 37412 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Exactlyjancivil wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 12:21 am TL;DR: it matters except when it doesn't.
Of course there have been musics which are interested in other things.
-
- Banned
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Personally I think my roots in the 80s made me attached to melodies. As long as it was preserved, e.g. In EBM and Goa, I was on board. However, when they left melody out and went rhythm and noise only, I could not catch up. Dance music without melodies sounds like a tune never starting to me. An never ending intro. I expect it to come any time but it does not. Another issue is my training in classical music, where my main interest is polyphony, mixture of several melodies, within modal as well as tonal frameworks. From the 1600 century till today, we have generally lost polyphony in our music, and only one melody rules a tune despite interplays. I like to hear more polyphony returning. Some brances of melodic psy-trance do this already, at least they typically mix two melodies, often arppegiated, which brings much more life and excitement to each of them. Only thing is that this may not be easy to do by ear at an advanced level, and thus you would need to study some counterpoint to really explore it. No “electronic musician” has time for such things now a day, has he? It is not something offered in construction kits afaik.
Last edited by IncarnateX on Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
-
- Banned
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Done
- Banned
- 2288 posts since 24 Mar, 2015 from Toronto, Canada
My personal take on the polyphony comment is its a sign of the times and how the general music listener pays (or doesn't pay!) attention to music anymore. They attention span is spread out across a wider activities. I admit I am guilty. I don't listen to records/releases/albums the way I used to when I was a young person. The days of putting on a LP and sitting there closely listening to the record and reading the list of credits on the song and reading lyrics is something I dont do anymore. I used to. Now I am as guilty as the next person. I will listen to music or spotify on my phone while doing other things as the same time and tying to multi task. I guess big time successful producers and music makers know this and they know a person in the modern era can only focus on one main theme or melody in a piece of modern music at a time, so there is not active attempts to make polyphony in a grand scheme. (I think music in film probably doesn't fall in this category).IncarnateX wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:16 am Personally I think my roots in the 80s made me attached to melodies. As long as it was preserved, e.g. In EBM and Goa, I was on board. However, when they left melody out and went rhythm and noise only, I could not catch up. Dance music without melodies sounds like a tune never starting to me. An never ending intro. I expect it to come any time but it does not. Another issue is my training in classical music, where my main interest is polyphony, mixture of several melodies, within modal as well as tonal frameworks. From the 1600 century till today, we have generally lost polyphony in our music, and only one melody rules a tune despite interplays. I like to hear more polyphony returning. Some brances of melodic psy-trance do this already, at least they typically mix two melodies, often arppegiated, which brings much more life and excitement to each of them. Only thing is that this may not be easy to do by ear at an advanced level, and thus you would need to study some counterpoint to really explore it. No “electronic musician” has time for such things now a day, has he? It is not something offered in construction kits afaik.
My personal take on modern music is I miss the lyrical content. I always felt popular music is poetry to music and the good lyricists seem gone and can only be found in back catalog catalog releases. Reading a set of lyrics and finding true meaning in them I dont seem to find as much in modern music. Its either not there and the approach is too simplistic or its there is a very strange form that seems a little aloof. As always, my own personal take on it and does not apply for anyone else or can be used as a generalization for others and their approach(es) to enjoying modern music releases.
Gear & Setup: Windows 10, Dual Xeon, 32GB RAM, Cubase 10.5/9.5, NI Komplete Audio 6, NI Maschine, NI Jam, NI Kontakt
- KVRAF
- 26033 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
I moved to guitar from drums because I got tired of trying to get melody from the drums.
Actually it was Hendrix who moved me to guitar, but I was actually stupidly retuning the few toms I had all the time trying to be somewhat melodic.
-
- KVRAF
- 6389 posts since 8 Jun, 2009
In the broad history of music, polyphony was a blip and only really possible because of strict rules and circumstances, such as the belief that music was as much part of physics as the motion of the sun and the moon. It was reserved for sacred music – the music played in the local bar was still primarily monophonic, but also far less constrained in terms of modal rules. The whole melodic arc was largely predefined. However, that allowed some room for improvisation in terms of things like melismatic singing. The strict rules meant that you were highly unlikely to hit a really bad dissonance as polyphony grew out of the more basic organum styles of the 11th and 12th Centuries.IncarnateX wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:16 am From the 1600 century till today, we have generally lost polyphony in our music, and only one melody rules a tune despite interplays. I like to hear more polyphony returning. Some brances of melodic psy-trance do this already, at least they typically mix two melodies, often arppegiated, which brings much more life and excitement to each of them.
The tradeoff is that polyphonic music of that type doesn't really go anywhere. It just drifts past with enough surface detail to keep the mind engaged as it switches between the lines. That psytrance has picked this up is perhaps not a big surprise as it often trades on that "spiritual" element. Plus it also gets to pick up on the rhythmic counterpoint that is common to non-Western music.
-
- Banned
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Yes, this is especially true what 1600 century style polyphony concerns but not tonal polyphony in which melodies are subordinated chord movements, e.g. like Bach, Mozart and Bethooven’s counterpoint.Gamma-UT wrote: Sun Feb 24, 2019 9:12 am The tradeoff is that polyphonic music of that type doesn't really go anywhere. It just drifts past with enough surface detail to keep the mind engaged as it switches between the lines.
Psy-trance can often be modal in nature, while e.g. Eurotrance relies heavily on chord movement. They could benefit from polyphony from each their roots, modal or tonal.
-
- Banned
- 3946 posts since 25 Jan, 2009
Well, Mozart has a lot of polyphony going on but he is deffo one of those who put forward a strong emphasis on one catchy main theme, and he was a genius at harmonization, so you may have to look a little closer to find it underneath the surface.Though, in his church music, his Requiem, he uses imitative counterpoint in many parts, and also has a double fugue along the way (Kyrie). However, here is Requiem Aeternam, the intro to Requiem. Wait for the vocals at 0.45, and here we go. Breathtaking. It brings me to my knees every time I hear it, along with many other parts of this masterpiece.
