Sylenth1 v3.050 Beta
- KVRian
- 1080 posts since 27 Nov, 2014
Still no proper preset browser
- KVRAF
- 5795 posts since 25 Dec, 2004
add the global tuning on this settings page please
config files are fine for now, but a clickable option in a menu is better
thanks heaps for these new updates!
sketches... http://soundcloud.com/onesnzeros
some artists i support... https://bandcamp.com/spectraselecta
some artists i support... https://bandcamp.com/spectraselecta
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 11174 posts since 12 May, 2008
Whoa finally, I’ve been waiting years for that!fluffy_little_something wrote: ↑Thu Jan 17, 2019 6:05 pm Had been using the demo for weeks, but never noticed the swing control in the arp That must be the first new feature in a very long time
-
- KVRist
- 230 posts since 4 Feb, 2015
When will v3.050 be officially released?
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
How to download the beta?
NWM its in my account
When the official will come out?
NWM its in my account
When the official will come out?
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
I like the ability to oversample, but are the settings at 1 oversampling already increased from what was originaly? i didnt noticed much difference, but at x4 there is hearable difference, unfortunetly at a CPU cost.
Actually even at x1 oversampling there is CPU intensity. I made exactly same patch on U-he Diva (roland jp module) using 4 supersaw oscillators and funny, but at Fast settings it actually use less CPU then Sylenth1 at x1. On draft settings Diva uses even less cpu.
Actually even at x1 oversampling there is CPU intensity. I made exactly same patch on U-he Diva (roland jp module) using 4 supersaw oscillators and funny, but at Fast settings it actually use less CPU then Sylenth1 at x1. On draft settings Diva uses even less cpu.
-
- KVRian
- 1307 posts since 25 Sep, 2006
There have been some improvements in the oscillators and filters, but also some CPU optimizations, so it sounds better than before, while using the same CPU power.
I'm certain you're not measuring correctly. Diva is a CPU hog. I can run 5 instances of Sylenth1 with random presets all with full effects and still consume less CPU than 1 instance of Diva in draft mode on the simple default sound with all effects turned off!
I'm certain you're not measuring correctly. Diva is a CPU hog. I can run 5 instances of Sylenth1 with random presets all with full effects and still consume less CPU than 1 instance of Diva in draft mode on the simple default sound with all effects turned off!
-
- KVRian
- 1307 posts since 25 Sep, 2006
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
No im not measuring it wrong. I played same chords, 2 stacks of jp8000 oscillators in Diva with multicore On and same with Sylenth1, applied same modulation, just with filters bypassed. In Fl it was ranging ~ 17 percent. Diva on on fast ~ 15 percent, draft 12-13 percent. Sylenth1 using x4 oversamlping starts to dropout at 6 instances on my core i7 4790k.Lennard wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 2:15 pm There have been some improvements in the oscillators and filters, but also some CPU optimizations, so it sounds better than before, while using the same CPU power.
I'm certain you're not measuring correctly. Diva is a CPU hog. I can run 5 instances of Sylenth1 with random presets all with full effects and still consume less CPU than 1 instance of Diva in draft mode on the simple default sound with all effects turned off!
-
- KVRAF
- 35650 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I don't think that is a fair comparison. The JP-8k oscillators are the most CPU saving of the oscillators in Diva, and, bypassing the filter is also a bit like cheating, because especially the filters are what's hogging the CPU in Diva.
- KVRAF
- 18741 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
Would you mind sharing the two patches you used in the test please ? I'd like to try it here. Not saying you're wrong just curious what the numbers would be here.Elektronisch wrote: ↑Wed Feb 27, 2019 3:42 pm I played same chords, 2 stacks of jp8000 oscillators in Diva with multicore On and same with Sylenth1, applied same modulation, just with filters bypassed. In Fl it was ranging ~ 17 percent. Diva on on fast ~ 15 percent, draft 12-13 percent.
Also are you using FL Studio's meter or Window's Task Manager ?
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
Sure thing, here they are.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Banned
- 3889 posts since 3 Feb, 2010
I bypassed them in Sylenth1 not diva, you cant do that in diva.