Tell to "Functional"vurt wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 12:52 pmnope.neodeavid wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 12:51 pmHey, "cerebrito", Massive X is not free.Functional wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 12:33 pmThat's where you're wrong - if someone gives me something for free, I demand to pay for it. I have these long, drawn out arguments with people who just give something for free. "What do you mean I don't have to pay for that kiss? What does it have to do with anything that you're my wife? YOU'RE GIVING A KISS FOR FREE, FOR GODS SAKE SUSAN"
Native Instruments Massive X Synth - Sequel to Massive (Out Now!)
-
- KVRist
- 61 posts since 27 May, 2015
-
- KVRist
- 163 posts since 10 Aug, 2006
My bad, I thought this thread was about Massive X, not sadowick.
Enjoy your conversation; there’s a reason I rarely participate here.
Enjoy your conversation; there’s a reason I rarely participate here.
- KVRAF
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
If I had the programming skills to do so, I'd create a new VSTi and name it "Alias". It would only play aliasing artifacts. 100% of the original oscillator signals would be removed from the output signal!
So many folks are into weird and unusual things, I'm certain someone would buy it!
So many folks are into weird and unusual things, I'm certain someone would buy it!
I'm involved with photography & audio. For more info, take a look at my site:
GlenVision.com
GlenVision.com
-
- KVRist
- 61 posts since 27 May, 2015
McLilith wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:02 pm If I had the programming skills to do so, I'd create a new VSTi and name it "Alias". It would only play aliasing artifacts. 100% of the original oscillator signals would be removed from the output signal!
So many folks are into weird and unusual things, I'm certain someone would buy it!![]()
- addled muppet weed
- 111238 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
im in!McLilith wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:02 pm If I had the programming skills to do so, I'd create a new VSTi and name it "Alias". It would only play aliasing artifacts. 100% of the original oscillator signals would be removed from the output signal!
So many folks are into weird and unusual things, I'm certain someone would buy it!![]()
-
- KVRist
- 109 posts since 1 Jan, 2018
I agree.realtrance wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:00 pm My bad, I thought this thread was about Massive X, not sadowick.
Enjoy your conversation; there’s a reason I rarely participate here.
I think people are jumping all over Sadowick with the cringey schoolyard-level insults because they want to boost themselves up, be part of the in-crowd, be seen in a good light by their peers etc. To do this they pick on the outsider, the different person and bully them and ostracise them. You'll notice of course that Sadowick hasn't posted much at all and yet people are still talking about him, slagging him off and saying the same things over and over again.
It's sickening. It's basically a mini version of the same ugly human behaviour that drives a lot of xenophobia, racism and right wing ideology.
- KVRAF
- 2548 posts since 7 Jul, 2003 from Huntington, WV
Naturally, "Alias" would have the option to select from 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, or 1/16 undersampling, and the LFOs would definitely go over Nyquist! 
The synth would also offer ring modulation between the aliasing artifacts of two different oscillators, for those who didn't find the original aliasing artifacts discordant enough. Not only that, it would go a step beyond ring modulation, and offer single sideband modulation, for some funky atonal pitch shifting and shortwave radio effects.
The synth would also offer ring modulation between the aliasing artifacts of two different oscillators, for those who didn't find the original aliasing artifacts discordant enough. Not only that, it would go a step beyond ring modulation, and offer single sideband modulation, for some funky atonal pitch shifting and shortwave radio effects.
I'm involved with photography & audio. For more info, take a look at my site:
GlenVision.com
GlenVision.com
-
- KVRist
- 131 posts since 23 Mar, 2019
50% off u-he diva / repro at NIUrs wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 12:48 pm Ok, my first impression: Massive X does not have a quality problem in the oscillators. There are no aritifacts to speak of with standard waveforms. I agree that SPAN needs to be set to extreme settings to exhibit harmonics on the sine wave. My impression is, the tools Sadowick is using are extremely sensitive, and I can't really work out what the dB-scale grid in the Fabfilter plug-in refers to.
I won't explore complex waveforms as long as I don't know what I'm doing though![]()
some people are going to assume that you can't speak quite as freely as you normally do.
I don't think I am being unreasonable because there's the possibility of a very slight conflict of interest.
Imo NI have lost credibility with this Synth, hardly anyone can deny it wasn't ready for release.
They shouldn't be rewarded for that. None of us should be defending what they are doing.
What next ..loot boxes in a Synth with day 1 dlc?
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Sure thing. The poor victim, with his clickbait scandal video.graspee wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:14 pmI agree.realtrance wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:00 pm My bad, I thought this thread was about Massive X, not sadowick.
Enjoy your conversation; there’s a reason I rarely participate here.
I think people are jumping all over Sadowick with the cringey schoolyard-level insults because they want to boost themselves up, be part of the in-crowd, be seen in a good light by their peers etc. To do this they pick on the outsider, the different person and bully them and ostracise them. You'll notice of course that Sadowick hasn't posted much at all and yet people are still talking about him, slagging him off and saying the same things over and over again.
It's sickening. It's basically a mini version of the same ugly human behaviour that drives a lot of xenophobia, racism and right wing ideology.
Face it. It was about power and attention. THAT is sickening.
-
- KVRian
- 880 posts since 26 Oct, 2011
UNACCEPTABLE!chk071 wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 12:30 pmOK, so, i set SPAN to go down to -120 dB now, and, there it is, starting at about -90 dB:perpetual3 wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 12:20 pmIt absolutely does.Steve1974 wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 7:45 amUrs, the sine wave hasn't any harmonics when the filters are turned off. I suppose it's a kind of overdrive behavior.Urs wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 3:41 am .. I'd surely hope that a user manual would clear up why the sine wave oscillators produce audible harmonics (nothing wrong with that if it's an inherent part of the synthesis..
Massive_X_Sine_05.jpg
For any other synth, people would probably argue that it's not in the audible range, but, not on this one, it seems.
Wonder where it's coming from, though. I checked in 3 oscilloscopes, and, each of them seemed to display a perfect sine.
Gonna check with some other plugins now.
Anyway, whatever you're seeing there, I cannot see it myself after I tested. Since I have the Serum demo though, I decided to test it as well. The results are in the attachments. Both normalized to same loudness +-0.2db. I had to play a particular note (I think it was a sharp, and let the puns begin) because I could not get the aliasing artifacts to appear in every note with Massive X, only some of them (which is quite interesting, actually). Both behave in a very similar fashion; Serum has just a tiny bit more visible aliasing artifacts when playing at higher frequencies but Serum also has slightly (like -6 - -12db or so) less amplitude in them.
This is Serum:
This is Massive X:
I also tested square waves. Serum performed significantly better than MX in terms of aliasing. That is, if you play a C9.
But play a C3 and honestly telling the aliasing apart is pretty much impossible. So now I know; if I am going to ever make music with square waves and I happen to need a note at ninth octave, I should definitively pick Serum in case aliasing is a no-go. I have now developed as a producer.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- 2514 posts since 28 Sep, 2012
Agreed.graspee wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:14 pmI agree.realtrance wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:00 pm My bad, I thought this thread was about Massive X, not sadowick.
Enjoy your conversation; there’s a reason I rarely participate here.
I think people are jumping all over Sadowick with the cringey schoolyard-level insults because they want to boost themselves up, be part of the in-crowd, be seen in a good light by their peers etc. To do this they pick on the outsider, the different person and bully them and ostracise them. You'll notice of course that Sadowick hasn't posted much at all and yet people are still talking about him, slagging him off and saying the same things over and over again.
It's sickening. It's basically a mini version of the same ugly human behaviour that drives a lot of xenophobia, racism and right wing ideology.
-
- KVRAF
- 2294 posts since 23 May, 2012 from London
Because of NKS compatibility...why does everything have to be some Massive (X) conspiracy all of the time?Kian Russell wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:19 pm50% off u-he diva / repro at NIUrs wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 12:48 pm Ok, my first impression: Massive X does not have a quality problem in the oscillators. There are no aritifacts to speak of with standard waveforms. I agree that SPAN needs to be set to extreme settings to exhibit harmonics on the sine wave. My impression is, the tools Sadowick is using are extremely sensitive, and I can't really work out what the dB-scale grid in the Fabfilter plug-in refers to.
I won't explore complex waveforms as long as I don't know what I'm doing though![]()
some people are going to assume that you can't speak quite as freely as you normally do.
I don't think I am being unreasonable because there's the possibility of a very slight conflict of interest.
Imo NI have lost credibility with this Synth, hardly anyone can deny it wasn't ready for release.
They shouldn't be rewarded for that. None of us should be defending what they are doing.
What next ..loot boxes in a Synth with day 1 dlc?
Always Read the Manual!
- addled muppet weed
- 111238 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
x files.
- KVRAF
- 18338 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
machinesworking wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 7:19 amI'm pretty sure the internet runs on men getting into flame wars on forums, (plus selfies of 8 to 35 year old women doing the duckface while flashing fake gang signs on their social media platform of choice). Without these things the ad revenue dries up and we're back to dial up modem speeds as servers are powered down world wide.Stefken wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 7:07 am And people shouldn't be treated like they committed a capital offense when they made a mistake.
So the next time you question whether you should respond to that perceived barb or wrongdoing on the internet realize you are doing Gods Work™
It is so exciting.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
I don't even think it's worth a comment. Ridiculous. I'm sure everyone at u-he or NI headquarters will laugh about it.PieBerger wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:22 pmBecause of NKS compatibility...why does everything have to be some Massive (X) conspiracy all of the time?Kian Russell wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:19 pm50% off u-he diva / repro at NIUrs wrote: Tue Jul 02, 2019 12:48 pm Ok, my first impression: Massive X does not have a quality problem in the oscillators. There are no aritifacts to speak of with standard waveforms. I agree that SPAN needs to be set to extreme settings to exhibit harmonics on the sine wave. My impression is, the tools Sadowick is using are extremely sensitive, and I can't really work out what the dB-scale grid in the Fabfilter plug-in refers to.
I won't explore complex waveforms as long as I don't know what I'm doing though![]()
some people are going to assume that you can't speak quite as freely as you normally do.
I don't think I am being unreasonable because there's the possibility of a very slight conflict of interest.
Imo NI have lost credibility with this Synth, hardly anyone can deny it wasn't ready for release.
They shouldn't be rewarded for that. None of us should be defending what they are doing.
What next ..loot boxes in a Synth with day 1 dlc?
Last edited by chk071 on Tue Jul 02, 2019 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
