Ableton Live Lite: any good?

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

chk071 wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:50 am The Beatles didn't do electronic music though.
Well, actually, in the wider world where we dont rewrite history according to the chk071-dictionary, they did, and are widely acknowledged for it. Electronic processing, tape manipulation, musique concrete, yadda yadda yadda. See 'Tomorrow Never Knows' and 'Revolution 9'.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

OK, so, basically any rock band these days does "electronic music". Good to know. Always handy to have the online whyterabbyt-dictionary (a.k.a. Wikipedia) at hand. :P

Post

chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:43 am OK, so, basically any rock band these days does "electronic music". Good to know.
Really? I would disagree with that myself. Wouldn't be another one of your usual big fat strawmen would it?
Always handy to have the online whyterabbyt-dictionary (a.k.a. Wikipedia) at hand. :P
Ah, that's right, you have a basic allergy to anything resembling evidence, dont you.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:21 pm Really? I would disagree with that myself.
Good. And i disagree that the Beatles are "electronic music", when they mainly use physical instruments. Actually, i don't even think i heard one song from them where they didn't, so, i really don't know what you're up to. Trying to prove someone wrong, i guess, your favorite pastime.

BRB, need to listen to the new single from DJ Paul McCartney. :roll:

Post

chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:35 pm
whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:21 pm Really? I would disagree with that myself.
Good. And i disagree that the Beatles are "electronic music", when they mainly use physical instruments. Actually, i don't even think i heard one song from them where they didn't, so, i really don't know what you're up to. Trying to prove someone wrong, i guess, your favorite pastime.

BRB, need to listen to the new single from DJ Paul McCartney. :roll:
Strawberry fields opening flute was made using a Mellotron which could be described as a rompler synth. (at a push - with a following wind)

By the way, highly subjective I know, personal, do not quote me, I deny I ever said it, but Strawberry fields is probably the best pop record ever made. :ud:

Post

dellboy wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:57 pm
chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:35 pm
whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:21 pm Really? I would disagree with that myself.
Good. And i disagree that the Beatles are "electronic music", when they mainly use physical instruments. Actually, i don't even think i heard one song from them where they didn't, so, i really don't know what you're up to. Trying to prove someone wrong, i guess, your favorite pastime.

BRB, need to listen to the new single from DJ Paul McCartney. :roll:
Strawberry fields opening flute was made using a Mellotron which could be described as a rompler synth. (at a push - with a following wind)
And George Harrison owned a Moog Modular which made its way onto some of the tracks on Abbey Road (in addition to using it on his solo album Electronic Sound

Post

chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:35 pm
whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:21 pm Really? I would disagree with that myself.
Good. And i disagree that the Beatles are "electronic music", when they mainly use physical instruments.
Another strawman. You claimed they never did any electronic music. And yet they did.
Actually, i don't even think i heard one song from them where they didn't, so, i really don't know what you're up to.
Oh here we go again. You dont know a thing, but you're the expert on it ...

What you, personally, have heard doesnt change anything. Revolution 9 still exists and is still musique concrete whether you've heard it or not..
Trying to prove someone wrong, i guess, your favorite pastime.
Just providing the facts. I know how you hate them, though.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

dellboy wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:57 pm
chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:35 pm
whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:21 pm Really? I would disagree with that myself.
Good. And i disagree that the Beatles are "electronic music", when they mainly use physical instruments. Actually, i don't even think i heard one song from them where they didn't, so, i really don't know what you're up to. Trying to prove someone wrong, i guess, your favorite pastime.

BRB, need to listen to the new single from DJ Paul McCartney. :roll:
Strawberry fields opening flute was made using a Mellotron which could be described as a rompler synth. (at a push - with a following wind)

By the way, highly subjective I know, personal, do not quote me, I deny I ever said it, but Strawberry fields is probably the best pop record ever made. :ud:
Sure... but... Beatles are no electronic music act... just like any band with a keyboarder in it isn't a electronic music act. At least in my book. Maybe humanity re-wrote the books in the meantime. Which wouldn't be a surprise for me at all.

Wikipedia, which seems to be the source of all wisdom in this modern world lists Beatles as a rock band, and that's what they are for me. Classic rock isn't about electronic instrumentalization. But, WTH do i know. I hate the Beatles.

Post

whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:04 pm Another strawman.
It's actually you who is pulling the strawmen. Beatles are no electronic music act.

Post

chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:07 pm
whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:04 pm Another strawman.
It's actually you who is pulling the strawmen.
quote it, then... on 'ygo...
Beatles are no electronic music act.
Irrelevant to anything I said. :shrug:
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:12 pm
chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:07 pm
whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:04 pm Another strawman.
It's actually you who is pulling the strawmen.
quote it, then... on 'ygo...
Here:
whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:27 am
chk071 wrote: Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:50 am The Beatles didn't do electronic music though.
Well, actually, in the wider world where we dont rewrite history according to the chk071-dictionary, they did, and are widely acknowledged for it.
So, the Beatles made electronic music. Even though they didn't. Unless a drum kit is electronic now, or a guitar, or a bass, or a human voice. It's irrelevant that they made use of electronic instruments, or other tech at some point, they're still mainly using physical instruments. Or whatever you want to call it in English, i don't know.

Post

chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:05 pm Sure... but... Beatles are no electronic music act... just like any band with a keyboarder in it isn't a electronic music act.
Doesnt matter whether they were 'an electronic music act', they dont have to be an electronic music act to do electronic music tracks.

For someone who posts on a music website, you sure have some funny ideas about music.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."

Post

whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:23 pm
chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:05 pm Sure... but... Beatles are no electronic music act... just like any band with a keyboarder in it isn't a electronic music act.
Doesnt matter whether they were 'an electronic music act', they dont have to be an electronic music act to do electronic music tracks.
Well... maybe i'm wrong. Could you post a Youtube video from a typical Beatles eletronic music track?

Post

chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:35 pm
whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:21 pm Really? I would disagree with that myself.
Good. And i disagree that the Beatles are "electronic music", when they mainly use physical instruments. Actually, i don't even think i heard one song from them where they didn't, so, i really don't know what you're up to. Trying to prove someone wrong, i guess, your favorite pastime.

BRB, need to listen to the new single from DJ Paul McCartney. :roll:
:ud:

Post

chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:27 pm
whyterabbyt wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:23 pm
chk071 wrote: Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:05 pm Sure... but... Beatles are no electronic music act... just like any band with a keyboarder in it isn't a electronic music act.
Doesnt matter whether they were 'an electronic music act', they dont have to be an electronic music act to do electronic music tracks.
Well... maybe i'm wrong. Could you post a Youtube video from a typical Beatles eletronic music track?
day in the life uses many "electronic music" techniques :)
one reason stockhausen was featured on the cover was their interest in such work.
:ud:

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”