like that.
What does your desktop look like?
-
- KVRist
- 97 posts since 4 Jan, 2004
Mine is very similar to mclilith: black background, with a recycle bin and one lonely shortcut to Live.
If I wanted to be literal like cypher, then to the left you would see a small rack with Roland VariOS, Novation A-Station, Kawai K5000, RedSound DarkStar 2, and looking a bit further left there would be a Roland V-Synth keyboard...
all of which would be overshadowed by the enormous amount of empty, exotic beer bottles on my desk.
If I wanted to be literal like cypher, then to the left you would see a small rack with Roland VariOS, Novation A-Station, Kawai K5000, RedSound DarkStar 2, and looking a bit further left there would be a Roland V-Synth keyboard...
all of which would be overshadowed by the enormous amount of empty, exotic beer bottles on my desk.
-
Karbon L. Forms Karbon L. Forms https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=29033
- KVRian
- 1415 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Inverness, Scotland
Switch it off then! (The walt disney but I fuckin do!)
Mines a shambles like me!

Time for the old virtual hoover!
Mines a shambles like me!

Time for the old virtual hoover!
.................................
"Hell is other People" J.P.Sartre
.................................
"Hell is other People" J.P.Sartre
.................................
- KVRAF
- 8124 posts since 13 Jan, 2003 from Darkest Kent, UK
Nice one McLilith, though I prefer a pastel black myself...

Is there really any advantage sticking with that orrible default teal though? Surely any colour will use the same resources...
Talking of which, I've read that some msstyles use less resources than others, I tried a couple (hacking the uxtheme first of course) but couldn't see any real difference. Maybe a really minimal, non-3d, primary colour style would benefit audio users?
If not, is it worth thinking about using Litestep instead? Does it really save any resources or do you lose a lot of functionality? Is all software compatible with it?
so may questions...
.g
Kingston wrote:Congratulations for hanging in the trenches with the win95 look people.
Is there really any advantage sticking with that orrible default teal though? Surely any colour will use the same resources...
Talking of which, I've read that some msstyles use less resources than others, I tried a couple (hacking the uxtheme first of course) but couldn't see any real difference. Maybe a really minimal, non-3d, primary colour style would benefit audio users?
If not, is it worth thinking about using Litestep instead? Does it really save any resources or do you lose a lot of functionality? Is all software compatible with it?
so may questions...
.g
- KVRAF
- 3266 posts since 22 Sep, 2003 from under the sun
i'm not sure i get what you're saying here. if it's a reply to my previous declaration, i switched the XP look off a long time ago. the first day, actually.Karbon L. Forms wrote:Switch it off then! (The walt disney but I fuckin do!)
-
Karbon L. Forms Karbon L. Forms https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=29033
- KVRian
- 1415 posts since 10 Jun, 2004 from Inverness, Scotland
Sorry dude. Didn't mean to doubt your inteligence. Of course the default sux and of course everyone (except Nu Audio Science (the bloke not the firm)) switches the shite off!Wopelka wrote:i'm not sure i get what you're saying here. if it's a reply to my previous declaration, i switched the XP look off a long time ago. the first day, actually.Karbon L. Forms wrote:Switch it off then! (The walt disney but I fuckin do!)
.................................
"Hell is other People" J.P.Sartre
.................................
"Hell is other People" J.P.Sartre
.................................
- KVRAF
- 6478 posts since 16 Dec, 2002
Me too, or rather the fisherprice-ness of it.personally, i hate the Walt Disney feel of the winXP look...
That's why I use some of the best (custom) XP visual styles available. By the way, they use exactly same API for the graphics as windows XP itself. Only a simple (and legit) patch is needed.
No worries of crashing anything and they will use even less memory because some of the 3rd party designers are lightyears ahead of microsoft. It's odd that MS didn't enable this feature by default.
And don't bother with any 3rd party shells like litestep if you like stability. They are not necessary for Visual Styles.
I'm not suprised that so many people have switched off the default Luna, But,
People, you DO have a choice. There are plenty of good looking, compact and better functioning alternatives to Luna and the old Win95 look.
Last edited by Kingston on Wed Oct 13, 2004 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- 48 posts since 2 May, 2002 from Brighton, UK
Mine changes radically every day. I've been a customisation whore for years.
Today:

Today:

-
- KVRAF
- 1682 posts since 13 Oct, 2003 from Oulu, Finland
Misspellers of the world, unit!
https://soundcloud.com/aflecht
https://soundcloud.com/aflecht
-
- KVRist
- 126 posts since 7 Sep, 2003 from Italy
-
- KVRAF
- 1907 posts since 29 Oct, 2003
my desktop looks nice, clean and functional.





