Zebra 3 feature suggestions
-
- KVRist
- 100 posts since 5 Sep, 2019
Yes ,
I used to be a Logic user, loved the design of it and most of the behaviors.(First DAW and first love
)But since Apple goes the dark route of ARM (still not 100% what they will do) and Catalina (which slow down so many companies .... even U-he, ) and some other stuff.
I had to change the System because of the unpredictable ways Apple go.
So back to Windows with Reaper lots of custom commands some to imitate Logic some to speed up my workflow.
-
- KVRist
- 408 posts since 17 Mar, 2005 from Cumbria, England
I'd like to have more than two global LFOs - four would be nice.
I'd also like to see an LFO module with a three phase output, ie. each of its three outputs are 120 degrees out of phase with the other two.
Maybe to have the delay module not to have knobs to select delay time but an editable display so that time could be set in ms or fractions of a bar.
And also to have the ability for the final channel amplifier to use an MSEG module instead of the standard envelope module.
Oh, and the envelopes to have an option not to start from zero each time they are triggered in monophonic mode. As well as the option to have the output shapes similar to those on DIVA's analogue EGs. The current shape of the curves in Zebra seem somewhat off to me, even when one plays around with the slider on the variable setting.
I'd also like to see an LFO module with a three phase output, ie. each of its three outputs are 120 degrees out of phase with the other two.
Maybe to have the delay module not to have knobs to select delay time but an editable display so that time could be set in ms or fractions of a bar.
And also to have the ability for the final channel amplifier to use an MSEG module instead of the standard envelope module.
Oh, and the envelopes to have an option not to start from zero each time they are triggered in monophonic mode. As well as the option to have the output shapes similar to those on DIVA's analogue EGs. The current shape of the curves in Zebra seem somewhat off to me, even when one plays around with the slider on the variable setting.
-
- KVRian
- 724 posts since 15 Feb, 2012 from France
That’s more of a genuine question (rather than a suggestion / request) : will Z3 be able to go into Razor sonic territories (especially its instantly evolving, scalpel sharp, unapologetically digital textures) ? I know Z2 can do additive synthesis already, but as much as I love Razor, Evil’s in the details and I just gel with the u-he overall workflow and soundprint more (than with any other synth manufacturers really).
-
- KVRian
- 528 posts since 27 Oct, 2004
-
- KVRAF
- 3629 posts since 8 Dec, 2008 from Global Cowboy
Zero latency would be nice 
No auto tune...
-
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
-
- KVRian
- 528 posts since 27 Oct, 2004
-
- u-he
- 30204 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
In the context of synthesis, I find Zebra's "HS Who Are You" infinitely more impressive than vocobotics.
(the combination of phrase based wavetables and vocoders is surely an option for the future, but the focus of development is on the current feature set of Z2, but on another quality level)
(the combination of phrase based wavetables and vocoders is surely an option for the future, but the focus of development is on the current feature set of Z2, but on another quality level)
-
- KVRAF
- 3629 posts since 8 Dec, 2008 from Global Cowboy
Urs...how about a custom u-he wrapper for stand alone applications ?
No auto tune...
-
- u-he
- 30204 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
We're working on stand alone versions. Mostly because AUv3 requires it, but also maybe for Windows.digitalboytn wrote: Tue Mar 10, 2020 8:50 am Urs...how about a custom u-he wrapper for stand alone applications ?