FR MSuperLooper - independent loop times
-
- KVRist
- 306 posts since 19 Jul, 2016
hello vojtech,
this is a great addition!
for the kind of freeform looping i'm experimenting with, the ability to set arbitrary loop lengths independent of each other would be fantastic - i could use multiple instances, but the ability to do this in a single instance would be lovely. i don't want my loop lengths to be multiples of each other, and the ease of switching between tracks in a single instance is great.
also, +1 to adding a feedback level, previously suggested in the forum.
this is a great addition!
for the kind of freeform looping i'm experimenting with, the ability to set arbitrary loop lengths independent of each other would be fantastic - i could use multiple instances, but the ability to do this in a single instance would be lovely. i don't want my loop lengths to be multiples of each other, and the ease of switching between tracks in a single instance is great.
also, +1 to adding a feedback level, previously suggested in the forum.
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Hi!
I have multiplies of a single bar option for the next version. In any case this will work only with sync enabled of course.
I have multiplies of a single bar option for the next version. In any case this will work only with sync enabled of course.
-
- KVRist
- 32 posts since 2 Jan, 2011
Multiples of single beat would be much better.MeldaProduction wrote: Sun May 03, 2020 8:21 pm Hi!
I have multiplies of a single bar option for the next version. In any case this will work only with sync enabled of course.
-
- Banned
- 2524 posts since 4 Jul, 2019
definitely - I guess 1 beat bars will be possible @60 /600beats per minuteMister36 wrote: Sun May 03, 2020 11:37 pmMultiples of single beat would be much better.MeldaProduction wrote: Sun May 03, 2020 8:21 pm Hi!
I have multiplies of a single bar option for the next version. In any case this will work only with sync enabled of course.![]()
and in terms of hertz/secs better again, most of the work I do uses time rather than beats
but great to see some improvements on the way
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Beats would be way to complex to use. But you can certainly do that in your DAW by setting the signature to 1/4 
-
- KVRist
- 32 posts since 2 Jan, 2011
In what way?
(Increased complexity is what's being asked for though.)
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
It would be really difficult to stop recording accurately imho. Anyways you'll be able to try using 1/4 signatureMister36 wrote: Fri May 15, 2020 9:49 amIn what way?
(Increased complexity is what's being asked for though.)
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
You can disable sync, then it won't be tied to bars. And you can run multiple instances if you don't want MSL tracks to be synced, but in general the tracks are ALWAYS keep in sync in a single instance. It's actually quite difficult to make it that way. It's kind of the main problem when designing such a looper.
