Studio One 5 Available Now (5.3 Out June 29th, 2021)

[WatchTheGuitar]

wasn't able to route MIDI in it to the slots of the mixer etc

In Studio One the mixer is purely for audio mixing. Anything MIDI based you have to do within an instrument track. It can take studio one three tracks to achieve what other DAWs can do in one, but you can usually find a way to do it.

The most important default key shortcut to know is F4 which when a track is selected will reveal extra track settings such as where the track routes from and to and on which channel.

[antic604]

but wasn't able to route MIDI in it to the slots of the mixer etc. ... to able to do it I should route back the MIDI from outside of S1 ... cmon, https://www.cableguys.com/midishaper-studio-one.html

I wouldn't trust that guide, as it's completely wrong for Bitwig, too:
https://www.cableguys.com/midishaper-bitwig.html

[xbitz]

but wasn't able to route MIDI in it to the slots of the mixer etc. ... to able to do it I should route back the MIDI from outside of S1 ... cmon, https://www.cableguys.com/midishaper-studio-one.html

I wouldn't trust that guide, as it's completely wrong for Bitwig, too:
https://www.cableguys.com/midishaper-bitwig.html

not worth the effort FL Studio can automate/modulate through its internal controllers anything from anywhere similar fashion way of Bitwig (has more versatile but less sophisticated method) simply too good

It’s equally as awesome as Bitwig’s modulators, but for different reasons.

- https://www.admiralbumblebee.com/music/ ... ation.html

[Trancit]

but wasn't able to route MIDI in it to the slots of the mixer etc. ... to able to do it I should route back the MIDI from outside of S1 ... cmon, https://www.cableguys.com/midishaper-studio-one.html

I wouldn't trust that guide, as it's completely wrong for Bitwig, too:
https://www.cableguys.com/midishaper-bitwig.html

not worth the effort FL Studio can automate/modulate through its internal controllers anything from anywhere similar fashion way of Bitwig (has more versatile but less sophisticated method) simply too good

It’s equally as awesome as Bitwig’s modulators, but for different reasons.

- https://www.admiralbumblebee.com/music/ ... ation.html

But it´s still a Studio One thread, isn´t it??

[antic604]

But it´s still a Studio One thread, isn´t it??

I think we've passed well beyond this when discussing pro vs. hobbyist musicians

Now we just wait until Hitler is mentioned and thread can be closed then. Ooops!

[xbitz]

^^^ dunno https://www.musicradar.com/news/madeon- ... vanced-daw

in "pro vs. hobbyist" topic

yepp it's still S1 topic just complaining about its MIDI CC/automation routing capability because otherwise really like its concepts (has chorder, score view, scratchpad really good in it etc. )

[xbitz]

ahamm, so audio/mixing has the prio in S1, still MIDI routing https://answers.presonus.com/3164/seria ... as-note-fx

...The current Multi Instrument basically is a folder with an audio bus. You can't compare it to Bidule which is much more extensive... as an Alternative to Multi Instruments:

1. Use FL Studio as a VSTi and use the Patcher https://www.image-line.com/support/FLHe ... atcher.htm . I love Patcher primarily because it has the multi-touch Control Surface.

2. I love Bidule for the freedom of midi and audio routing. Bidule beside replacing Multi Instruments it can also be used as an Instrument Input. Done it this both ways in Cubase.

3. Besides Bidule there is energyXT and other free and paid modular VST/VSTi’s that can host VST/VSTi’s. Too bad that the free MiniHost Modular by Image-Line has issues in the 64 bit Studio One.

maybe in the following versions MIDI gonna get more love, fingers crossed

[Robert Randolph]

still not possible routing MIDI directly into effects https://answers.presonus.com/25522/midi ... ts-inserts seems nonsense to me

getting to understand where those routing values come from

https://www.admiralbumblebee.com/DAW-Chart.html

So on a scale of 0 to 10, Studio One gets a 2 rating for its routing capabilities? Tough crowd!

Just to be clear, these values aren't "How good is it relative to what most people would do".

They are "How much functionality does this product have compared to the product with the most functionality in this class".

This often means that some products that have sufficient functionality for common workflows will have low ratings.

This Studio One Rating should be higher though. At least a 3.

[billcarroll]

How's the CPU?

I’m suprised no one has posted CPU comparisons between v4.x and v5.x

[jinotsuh]

No 'scientific' tests here, no need really for me, but there is no noticeable difference in CPU performance either way, and that's all that matters really. Couldn't care less if a more 'scientific' method reported CPU performance was better or worse if it is unnoticeable in the real world.

[EnGee]

still not possible routing MIDI directly into effects https://answers.presonus.com/25522/midi ... ts-inserts seems nonsense to me

getting to understand where those routing values come from

https://www.admiralbumblebee.com/DAW-Chart.html

So on a scale of 0 to 10, Studio One gets a 2 rating for its routing capabilities? Tough crowd!

Just to be clear, these values aren't "How good is it relative to what most people would do".

They are "How much functionality does this product have compared to the product with the most functionality in this class".

This often means that some products that have sufficient functionality for common workflows will have low ratings.

This Studio One Rating should be higher though. At least a 3.

Little bit off topic! You gave Logic 1/10 in routing! Has it changed that much?! I remember in the old days there was "Environment" that you need really to read/study a lot about it in order to use it! It is not there anymore?

[Robert Randolph]

still not possible routing MIDI directly into effects https://answers.presonus.com/25522/midi ... ts-inserts seems nonsense to me

getting to understand where those routing values come from

https://www.admiralbumblebee.com/DAW-Chart.html

So on a scale of 0 to 10, Studio One gets a 2 rating for its routing capabilities? Tough crowd!

Just to be clear, these values aren't "How good is it relative to what most people would do".

They are "How much functionality does this product have compared to the product with the most functionality in this class".

This often means that some products that have sufficient functionality for common workflows will have low ratings.

This Studio One Rating should be higher though. At least a 3.

Little bit off topic! You gave Logic 1/10 in routing! Has it changed that much?! I remember in the old days there was "Environment" that you need really to read/study a lot about it in order to use it! It is not there anymore?

I don't think it's good to clutter this thread with chat about my website and different DAW. Please DM me or comment there or start another thread etc...

(Logic's routing still sucks comparatively)

[Robert Randolph]

How's the CPU?

I’m suprised no one has posted CPU comparisons between v4.x and v5.x

I'd happily do this.

If someone came up with a test project or ideas to execute, then I'll put together some numbers.

Don't have time to craft a realistic test myself. I'm still busy with this whole "Studio One Jitter" thing which is apparently more complex (and potentially more broken) than I originally thought.

[antic604]

How's the CPU?

I’m suprised no one has posted CPU comparisons between v4.x and v5.x

Why you're 'surprised'? The changelog doesn't mention any changes in this area and I also can't see it working better or worse on my system, at least

[EnochLight]

I think we've passed well beyond this when discussing pro vs. hobbyist musicians

Now we just wait until Hitler is mentioned and thread can be closed then. Ooops!

You *HAD* to invoke Godwins Law... so soon?! We’re only on page 3 million!