Like what?jens wrote: Sun Aug 16, 2020 10:21 am For starters, a hardware reverb is potentially a lot more than a bunch of algorithms, even if it is a digital one.
Exponential Audio Verbs: PhoenixVerb, Nimbus, R4. Your Thoughts?
-
- KVRist
- 171 posts since 27 Aug, 2009
Yorgos Simeonidis
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12512 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
Agree. I don't think Michael Carnes set out to clone the PCM verbs when he started Exponential. I think he wanted to take his knowledge and create "better" algorithms. Whether he did that or not will be up to each listener's taste but I don't see any reason to think the PCM series and Exponential verbs would sound alike just because the same person was involved. That'd be like saying two songs by the same artist can't be THAT different, or two paintings by the same painter can't be THAT different. Why not? Some people try not try not to repeat themselves.jens wrote: Sun Aug 16, 2020 10:21 amAnd why not?
Just because the algorithms have been developed by the same person?
-
vitocorleone123 vitocorleone123 https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=333504
- KVRAF
- 2505 posts since 30 Jun, 2014 from Pacific NW
They may have a familial sound (long time since I used PCM), but the EA verbs aren't clones.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote: Sun Aug 16, 2020 5:37 pmAgree. I don't think Michael Carnes set out to clone the PCM verbs when he started Exponential. I think he wanted to take his knowledge and create "better" algorithms. Whether he did that or not will be up to each listener's taste but I don't see any reason to think the PCM series and Exponential verbs would sound alike just because the same person was involved. That'd be like saying two songs by the same artist can't be THAT different, or two paintings by the same painter can't be THAT different. Why not? Some people try not try not to repeat themselves.jens wrote: Sun Aug 16, 2020 10:21 amAnd why not?
Just because the algorithms have been developed by the same person?
A lot of preference will have to do with context and genre. Context, in that if you're jamming out, some huge and dirty sounding reverb is amazing. In a tight electronic or classic orchestral piece, it's just unwanted noise and frequency build-up when trying to mix it. Using a modulated, dirty reverb on a Send definitely seems to work better so that there's not several of them competing and clashing, turning the background into soup.
For my uses, needs, and preferences, this is why I like EA and Relab (some day I'll get you, VSR S24, you will be mine!!). I can always "dirty them up" on a Send with whatever chorus, compression, distortion, etc. I want, but it's hard/impossible to go in the other direction to clean one up.
As I type this, I'm having fun with Supermassive, playing the OB-6 thru it solo. Just messing around. It's so huge it'd HAVE to be solo, or very near to it with sparse elements flitting through. Or as a song intro and then slowly dial back the reverb as the song comes into focus.
- KVRAF
- 11393 posts since 3 Feb, 2003 from Finland, Espoo
To my ears the Exponential audio algorithms seem a lot more "dense" than the PCM algorithms. Dense is NOT always a good thing though.
Having said that, you can control this with the diffusion control.. but the results are still different.
I only have the LXP bundle for Lexicon but do like them quite a lot. Had sort of forgotten that I have them though.
Currently I'm re-exploring AriesVerb which is such an interesting thing to play around with. You can get almost any reverb done with it.. and usually stumble on happy accidents.
Having said that, you can control this with the diffusion control.. but the results are still different.
I only have the LXP bundle for Lexicon but do like them quite a lot. Had sort of forgotten that I have them though.
Currently I'm re-exploring AriesVerb which is such an interesting thing to play around with. You can get almost any reverb done with it.. and usually stumble on happy accidents.
"Wisdom is wisdom, regardless of the idiot who said it." -an idiot
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
"They don't ban hate speech; they ban speech they hate." -an oracle
- addled muppet weed
- 111329 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
mojo!
there will be ad/da conversions, these may add noise, which in turn may colour the reverb.
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
My favourite can-do-it-all-and-then-some reverbs are B2 and H-Reverb.
Hving said that: I loved - and religiously used - Ariesverb 0.4 back in the day...
I never got the commercial version though. And got means two different things here (i.e. both apply).
Hving said that: I loved - and religiously used - Ariesverb 0.4 back in the day...
I never got the commercial version though. And got means two different things here (i.e. both apply).
- addled muppet weed
- 111329 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
software i use a couple of reaktor ensembles, spacemaster2 and the blackhole emulation.
at the minute though im loving sending the guitar through a stereo pair of real springs
sadly, not a matched pair but still fun.
at the minute though im loving sending the guitar through a stereo pair of real springs
sadly, not a matched pair but still fun.
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
vurt wrote: Sun Aug 16, 2020 7:22 pmmojo!
there will be ad/da conversions, these may add noise, which in turn may colour the reverb.
Yes, exactly. Any hardware is a system that starts with the input and ends at the output. in the case of digital hardware, the algorithms are a major part of the system, but not the system itself.
I have no idea what kind of colorizations the PCM hardware entails though. I would guess there are big differences between 70, 80 and 91 (and whatever else there may be).
Also I have absolutely zero clue whether the plugins emulate the hardware - and if they do who the coded these bits.
- addled muppet weed
- 111329 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
cant comment on this either, but if i was looking for reverbs, id choose one that sounded good rather than one than sounds like an emulation...jens wrote: Sun Aug 16, 2020 7:31 pmvurt wrote: Sun Aug 16, 2020 7:22 pmmojo!
there will be ad/da conversions, these may add noise, which in turn may colour the reverb.
Yes, exactly. Any hardware is a system that starts with the input and ends at the output. in the case of digital hardware, the algorithms are a major part of the system, but not the system itself.
I have no idea what kind of colorizations the PCM hardware entails though. I would guess there are big differences between 70, 80 and 91 (and whatever else there may be).
Also I have absolutely zero clue whether the plugins emulate the hardware - and if they do who the coded these bits.
these may be the same, but the point is id be listening for what sounds good!
forget judging it against the hardware, how does it sound??? thats what matters in the end
-
- KVRAF
- 1863 posts since 11 Apr, 2008
Plugin Boutique promo is really nice. R4 + Trash 2 for $29.
I always was too skimpy to even check Exponential Audio reverbs (because of normal price).
I read the entire topic. Even that all of you said that R4 is not (very) transparent, in comparison to most of reverbs that I have, this one is still very "smooth". This is the kind of reverb I was missing in my arsenal.
I have some Liquidsonics reverbs (not the newest) but static IR (even Reverberate 2) is still a huge compromise for a reverb.
Others that I have are very audible in the mix. R4 can give nice 'cloud' to the sound and even that it's easy to hear it in the mix, it's not that much of attention seeker.
R4 is really nice on vocals and acoustic instruments, not so much on huge lead synths (for this NI Raum is great).
To stir the pot: I agree with those who are not huge fans of Valhalla reverbs. I don't like them and I feel like something is missing in their sound. Even more, it makes me happy that I could get reverb which sounds great for an even smaller price than Valhalla plugins
Now I'm really curious about Nimbus. I hope that it will also cost $29 on PB at some point
I always was too skimpy to even check Exponential Audio reverbs (because of normal price).
I read the entire topic. Even that all of you said that R4 is not (very) transparent, in comparison to most of reverbs that I have, this one is still very "smooth". This is the kind of reverb I was missing in my arsenal.
I have some Liquidsonics reverbs (not the newest) but static IR (even Reverberate 2) is still a huge compromise for a reverb.
Others that I have are very audible in the mix. R4 can give nice 'cloud' to the sound and even that it's easy to hear it in the mix, it's not that much of attention seeker.
R4 is really nice on vocals and acoustic instruments, not so much on huge lead synths (for this NI Raum is great).
To stir the pot: I agree with those who are not huge fans of Valhalla reverbs. I don't like them and I feel like something is missing in their sound. Even more, it makes me happy that I could get reverb which sounds great for an even smaller price than Valhalla plugins
Now I'm really curious about Nimbus. I hope that it will also cost $29 on PB at some point
-
- KVRian
- 1272 posts since 13 May, 2015
Your wish comes true....
https://www.pluginboutique.com/product/ ... 230-NIMBUS
https://www.pluginboutique.com/product/ ... 230-NIMBUS
-
- KVRist
- 343 posts since 11 May, 2010
edit...just realized Nimbus is the big brother of Phoenixverb, which I already bought for 9.99...
Not going for this, so far I have been using Phoenixverb and haven't needed to dive any deeper so I'll (for once) hold off. Already reeling from the u-he sale.
I also bought R4 and have been using both quite a bit. I had read Phoenix was more of a transparent verb and so far that matches my experience.
Not going for this, so far I have been using Phoenixverb and haven't needed to dive any deeper so I'll (for once) hold off. Already reeling from the u-he sale.
I also bought R4 and have been using both quite a bit. I had read Phoenix was more of a transparent verb and so far that matches my experience.
- KVRAF
- 4585 posts since 12 Jan, 2019
I got Nimbus some time ago. I don't wind up using the extra controls for the most part. It does have a lot more presets and an additional reverb algorithm, but I'm thinking Phoenixverb would have been fine for what I do.Stokely wrote: Fri Dec 18, 2020 11:28 pm edit...just realized Nimbus is the big brother of Phoenixverb, which I already bought for 9.99...
Doing nothing is only fun when you have something you are supposed to do.
-
Scarlet Pumpernickel Scarlet Pumpernickel https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=402106
- KVRist
- 266 posts since 30 Jul, 2017
I bought Phoenix and then Nimbus a long time ago (full price times). IMO, Nimbus shouldn't have been marketed as anything more than a Phoenix upgrade. Having said that, the additional ER patterns made Nimbus almost useful for me.
-
- KVRAF
- 1819 posts since 10 Jul, 2018
I'm curious about R4's ability to modulate the ER and tail separately---how useful does that actually end up being?...
If the answer is "not very" I'm wondering whether Neoverb might be better in the long run.
If the answer is "not very" I'm wondering whether Neoverb might be better in the long run.
