dude! you never seen clash of the titans? lulz.
Can anything compete with DIVA or Repro in 2020?!
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105872 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105872 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
- KVRAF
- 2281 posts since 25 Apr, 2009 from Doritos Land where no goblins are allowed
Thanks for the good laugh !poopinpants wrote: ↑Fri Sep 25, 2020 4:41 am I have been trying DIVA and Repro 5 and they are both so good and I am like what out there can even compete and get that believable hardware sound, because I have tried a BUNCH of synths and they cannot compete
Hey, I got another one : I have tried Sylenth1 and it's so good that no synth can compete.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Please don’t read the above post. It’s a stupid one. Simply pass.
- GRRRRRRR!
- 15961 posts since 14 Jun, 2001 from Somewhere else, on principle
How is it limited? It's got two oscillators with cross-modulation, the possibilities are, quite literally, endless.
Why? I tend to like a bit of attack in most of my synth sounds, even basslines. I bit of attack gives you that bass thump as the filter opens, which is accentuated more as you increase the resonance value. Unless you are using a ladder filter, in which case there is nothing you can do to get that bass thump.
NOVAkILL : Asus RoG Flow Z13, Core i9, 16GB RAM, Win11 | EVO 16 | Studio One | bx_oberhausen, GR-8, JP6K, Union, Hexeract, Olga, TRK-01, SEM, BA-1, Thorn, Prestige, Spire, Legend-HZ, ANA-2, VG Iron 2 | Uno Pro, Rocket.
-
excuse me please excuse me please https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=427648
- KVRAF
- 1631 posts since 10 Oct, 2018
I assume "limited" is the the new hipster buzzword.
- KVRAF
- 7691 posts since 11 Jun, 2006
anything can compete if you chain sausage fattener after it.
HW SYNTHS [KORG T2EX - AKAI AX80 - YAMAHA SY77 - ENSONIQ VFX]
HW MODULES [OBi M1000 - ROLAND MKS-50 - ROLAND JV880 - KURZ 1000PX]
SW [CHARLATAN - OBXD - OXE - ELEKTRO - MICROTERA - M1 - SURGE - RMiV]
DAW [ENERGY XT2/1U RACK WINXP / MAUDIO 1010LT PCI]
HW MODULES [OBi M1000 - ROLAND MKS-50 - ROLAND JV880 - KURZ 1000PX]
SW [CHARLATAN - OBXD - OXE - ELEKTRO - MICROTERA - M1 - SURGE - RMiV]
DAW [ENERGY XT2/1U RACK WINXP / MAUDIO 1010LT PCI]
-
- KVRAF
- 35436 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
It is limited to other synths I own which cost the half of what Oberhausen costs regularly, and which do a 100 times more than Oberhausen.
Don't get me wrong, I like Oberhausen, it's just that it's... limited.
Now you gotta be kidding me. A Minimoog is the definition of that bass thump you are talking about. It has a gazillion times snappier envelopes and filter behavior as well.BONES wrote: ↑Mon Sep 28, 2020 3:16 amWhy? I tend to like a bit of attack in most of my synth sounds, even basslines. I bit of attack gives you that bass thump as the filter opens, which is accentuated more as you increase the resonance value. Unless you are using a ladder filter, in which case there is nothing you can do to get that bass thump.
Horses for courses. It shouldn't surprise you though that the Oberheim's were rather famous for their pads than their snappy bass sounds.
- KVRAF
- 5813 posts since 17 Aug, 2004 from Berlin, Germany
bx_oberhausen... one of my criticisms in 2019 was the very high CPU consumption and the very high price (Diva is better in both areas). But without doubt, the bx_oberhausen sounds better than e.g. the Arturia SEM (the Arturia sounds rather thin). Was the CPU consumption optimised with later updates? With the price... PA is well known that you can only buy the plugins at special offers Then the prices are no fantasy prices...
Competing with Diva... hmm... for me yes. I use the (Arturia) SEM much more often than Diva, because I like the easy programming and the sound. bx_oberhausen is even better and therefore certainly a candidate as a competitor...
Competing with Diva... hmm... for me yes. I use the (Arturia) SEM much more often than Diva, because I like the easy programming and the sound. bx_oberhausen is even better and therefore certainly a candidate as a competitor...
| Links
-
excuse me please excuse me please https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=427648
- KVRAF
- 1631 posts since 10 Oct, 2018
Yeah the Obie bass sounds were pretty limited
Would not say the bass sounds of the Jupiter were much better than the Juno. Decent, but that was in the 80's about all.
The Roland drums, the horrible TB. They created the whole revival, not the analog synths lol. Most were digital. Nobody wanted analog. Until vsts came.. then suddenly people began to use the "magic" word "analog" again.
Not because of all those stupid synths but because of audio hardware. Kinda expensive stuff. Just marketing. All it is. People won't notice anyhow. The wish is the father of the thought.
All the rest is a suggestion. How someone perceives something. It's about air impressions. That's all.
Would not say the bass sounds of the Jupiter were much better than the Juno. Decent, but that was in the 80's about all.
The Roland drums, the horrible TB. They created the whole revival, not the analog synths lol. Most were digital. Nobody wanted analog. Until vsts came.. then suddenly people began to use the "magic" word "analog" again.
Not because of all those stupid synths but because of audio hardware. Kinda expensive stuff. Just marketing. All it is. People won't notice anyhow. The wish is the father of the thought.
All the rest is a suggestion. How someone perceives something. It's about air impressions. That's all.
-
- KVRAF
- 35436 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany