Tracktion in GuitarPlayer magazine...
-
- KVRist
- 268 posts since 11 Nov, 2003 from kentucky
Thanks. I missed that when my copy came in the mail.
There's no new information here but the review is very positive. It's about time guitar player gave some exposure to Tracktion. It's nearly perfect for their audience.
There's no new information here but the review is very positive. It's about time guitar player gave some exposure to Tracktion. It's nearly perfect for their audience.
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
I agree! I actually logged on to post this, and here someone's beat me to it. 
The review is by noted author and computer recording expert Craig Anderton, too, so it's not like it's just some hack who threw together a review. My understanding by the little tag in the upper left of the page is that this is a review that also appears in EQ magazine.
Greg
The review is by noted author and computer recording expert Craig Anderton, too, so it's not like it's just some hack who threw together a review. My understanding by the little tag in the upper left of the page is that this is a review that also appears in EQ magazine.
Greg
-
- KVRAF
- 12977 posts since 29 Sep, 2003 from Ottawa, Canada
It doesn't say anything we don't already know.
Para 1. introduces, says that some users love it, some find it too 'different'.
Para 2. enthuses about the ease of use and workflow, notably the lack of multiple windows. Mentions mixer-less environment and "filters".
Para 3. notes that there are features you wouldn't expect at this price, including automation, Auto-Tempo loops, the basic plug-ins included, and MIDI functionality. Strangely (or maybe not, it IS a guitar mag) no mention of Freeze or PDC.
Para 4. Summary: For $80, it competes with the majors' "lite" versions, and will do everything needed by most users "who are willing to think a bit outside the box."
Nothing cutting edge, and nothing too insightful, but it IS a positive review, and the space limitation probably had something to do with Anderton's inability to go TOO deeply into it.
Greg
Para 1. introduces, says that some users love it, some find it too 'different'.
Para 2. enthuses about the ease of use and workflow, notably the lack of multiple windows. Mentions mixer-less environment and "filters".
Para 3. notes that there are features you wouldn't expect at this price, including automation, Auto-Tempo loops, the basic plug-ins included, and MIDI functionality. Strangely (or maybe not, it IS a guitar mag) no mention of Freeze or PDC.
Para 4. Summary: For $80, it competes with the majors' "lite" versions, and will do everything needed by most users "who are willing to think a bit outside the box."
Nothing cutting edge, and nothing too insightful, but it IS a positive review, and the space limitation probably had something to do with Anderton's inability to go TOO deeply into it.
Greg
