Just turned this baby on, installed Cubase 10.5 Pro and installed all u-He Synths.
Diva crushes it, exact same performance as on my i7 5820k.
Does it sound normal or i am missing something?
Thanks
i9 10900k brand new Built...u-He Crushes It
-
- KVRian
- 1339 posts since 25 Sep, 2011 from New York
Reality is a Condition due to Lack of Weed!
-
- u-he
- 30215 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRAF
- 24442 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Might wanna try another DAW, see if it's the same or better. Diva in multicore mode? Which quality mode? ASIO Guard on or off? Power options set to Ultimate Performance?
-
- KVRist
- 479 posts since 23 Apr, 2006 from Berlin
That doesn’t sound right, my i7 4790k can run Diva perfectly well.
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1339 posts since 25 Sep, 2011 from New York
I am not really complaining but just wondering if it is about right. I tried Divine with MultiCore,
MultiProcessing and AsioGuard ON, 128 Buffer on RME UFX. 3 Instances and each Instance a Gold Strip
with ALL ON by Acustica Audio...i think it was about right. Latest version of Diva. Average goes to
about 45-50 but it peaks a lot to about 75-80.
MultiProcessing and AsioGuard ON, 128 Buffer on RME UFX. 3 Instances and each Instance a Gold Strip
with ALL ON by Acustica Audio...i think it was about right. Latest version of Diva. Average goes to
about 45-50 but it peaks a lot to about 75-80.
Reality is a Condition due to Lack of Weed!
-
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
-
- KVRian
- 814 posts since 18 May, 2007 from Berlin
As far as I can google, clock speed isn't drastically different, you just have a lot more cores. So I would expect the per-core-performance to also be somewhat similar to that of your previous CPU.
Now if you were to run, say, two instances of Diva, both playing 16 notes with multicore enabled, I'd expect to see a difference in overall CPU performance then, as the voices can be spread across more cores.
Now if you were to run, say, two instances of Diva, both playing 16 notes with multicore enabled, I'd expect to see a difference in overall CPU performance then, as the voices can be spread across more cores.
-
- KVRAF
- 24442 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Also Acustica Audio plugins are usually CPU hogs, so I wonder if that's a part of the issue.
-
- KVRist
- 479 posts since 23 Apr, 2006 from Berlin
How are the temps of the cpu? maybe there’s a cooling issue and it’s throttling?
It’s been a while since I’ve used Cubase but I don’t remember Diva or other u-he plug-ins being especially problematic.
I’ll test the latest demo later but I think Diva used around 20% on my machine.
It’s been a while since I’ve used Cubase but I don’t remember Diva or other u-he plug-ins being especially problematic.
I’ll test the latest demo later but I think Diva used around 20% on my machine.
-
- KVRist
- 479 posts since 23 Apr, 2006 from Berlin
It could also be a power supply issue or a weak VRMs in the motherboard.
-
- KVRist
- 479 posts since 23 Apr, 2006 from Berlin
so, for reference on my ancient i7 4790k using Diva + Ableton Live I'm getting 18-22% with multicore off and around 10% when multicore is on.
This is with the default patch set to Divine and banging some 4 note chords.
I hope that helps.
This is with the default patch set to Divine and banging some 4 note chords.
I hope that helps.
-
- Banned
- 252 posts since 14 Oct, 2020
Turn off speed step (cpu speed scaling) and set cpu clock to work on max via UEFI 
-
- KVRist
- 479 posts since 23 Apr, 2006 from Berlin
I have cpu scaling enabled fwiw.
-
- KVRAF
- 24442 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Yeah I would totally disable that on a desktop.