It's a synth, if it's any good it should be able to do all kinds of sounds. That's why I don't think it's very good, because it fails at one of the most obvious things anyone would want to do with a synth.
Do you see anything in my signature to indicate I am speaking for anyone other than myself? No, so bugger off and annoy someone else.Also, please don't generalize your opinion. Music is probably the most subjective thing out there.
Do you realise how utterly stupid what you wrote here is? I agree that it's good to have choices but Vital doesn't allow me to choose to make nice squelchy basslines or a dozen other things that any of it's competitors, synths all of us already own, allow me to do easily. So why would I bother with this?SLiC wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:59 amYup- using filters for subtractive sound design is just one (very overused) method of synthesis, with the WT stuff I often just use filters for a bit of EQ or not at all. If you want warm analogue or screaming resonance, use a real analogue synth (or a good VA), this is nice and digital, its good to have choices
I made a point of checking it out last night and on my system Vital's GUI looks really clean and crisp, none of that ugliness in the screenshots people have posted. Have you guys run the ClearType utility on you PCs? It might help.
If you really believe that, then you must be a clueless idiot whose opinion is worthless because by any objective measure, Vital's filters are terrible. Worse even that PhasePlant's, which are pretty bland.