The switch would not detract from that. One of the options would be split. As it is.gunnar wrote: Sat Dec 26, 2020 6:52 pm I prefer this without a switch. Makes things faster as it is...
PLASMONIC - A new synth from Brian Clevinger
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12066 posts since 12 May, 2008
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 8100 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
Mostly I just want fine on the left and bottom, course right and top. 
- KVRAF
- 2641 posts since 16 May, 2004 from Soviet Union
From possible wishes, would be interesting to have here so to speak "active" feedback in Resonator section (at high resonance value resp.), "active" i mean - feedback tail not only during pressed key. Though ofcourse current resonance design as well have sense to be, but could be add some optional mode (or switch between resonator types).
And the same thing for filter self oscillation, it works with active note only, would be good to have self-generate ability (again, optionally\additional types).
It's not critical, but could definitely add tasty complexity to the palette especially in drone machine role (as mentioned in a recent thread).
UPD yes i know about Spaces section, this btw done amazingly and exactly what need (for me it's heart of device hehe), but nevertheless
And the same thing for filter self oscillation, it works with active note only, would be good to have self-generate ability (again, optionally\additional types).
It's not critical, but could definitely add tasty complexity to the palette especially in drone machine role (as mentioned in a recent thread).
UPD yes i know about Spaces section, this btw done amazingly and exactly what need (for me it's heart of device hehe), but nevertheless
-
- KVRist
- 344 posts since 29 May, 2001
Spaces ist amazjng...
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12066 posts since 12 May, 2008
Yes I requested this too.machinesworking wrote: Sat Dec 26, 2020 8:27 pm Mostly I just want fine on the left and bottom, course right and top.![]()
- KVRAF
- 2641 posts since 16 May, 2004 from Soviet Union
I'm afraid that it would neutralize one of his current strengths in the form of low CPU consumption. I think that the author has found a certain optimal balance, but this is already near the line (in certain condition\poly - try to set more than default 4, and adsr release at max). Further - there may be complaints.ScrLk wrote: Sat Dec 26, 2020 11:05 pm Could there be a high quality mode that reduces the graininess of some of the modeling?
- KVRAF
- 27000 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Having a high quality mode doesn't stop anyone from using the current one...c_voltage wrote: Sat Dec 26, 2020 11:24 pmI'm afraid that it would neutralize one of his current strengths in the form of low CPU consumption. I think that the author has found a certain optimal balance, but this is already near the line (in certain condition\poly - try to set more than default 4, and adsr release at max). Further - there may be complaints.ScrLk wrote: Sat Dec 26, 2020 11:05 pm Could there be a high quality mode that reduces the graininess of some of the modeling?
- KVRAF
- 2641 posts since 16 May, 2004 from Soviet Union
Well.. although that correctly too.pdxindy wrote: Sun Dec 27, 2020 12:21 amHaving a high quality mode doesn't stop anyone from using the current one...c_voltage wrote: Sat Dec 26, 2020 11:24 pmI'm afraid that it would neutralize one of his current strengths in the form of low CPU consumption. I think that the author has found a certain optimal balance, but this is already near the line (in certain condition\poly - try to set more than default 4, and adsr release at max). Further - there may be complaints.ScrLk wrote: Sat Dec 26, 2020 11:05 pm Could there be a high quality mode that reduces the graininess of some of the modeling?
- KVRian
- 1002 posts since 28 Apr, 2002 from Canada
Plasmonic is out of this world, best synth of the year for me. So happy when something lives up to the hype.
I actually really like the interface in terms of functionality - so quick to create sounds & assign modulation destinations.
Can't wait to see how it evolves over time, & if Brian comes up with anything else in the future I will buy it for sure.
I actually really like the interface in terms of functionality - so quick to create sounds & assign modulation destinations.
Can't wait to see how it evolves over time, & if Brian comes up with anything else in the future I will buy it for sure.
Black Octopus Sound | Royalty free Samples & Presets | VST Plugins & Software
Vocal Atmospheres Bundle 2 out now!: CHECK IT OUT HERE
Buy your plugins on Black Octopus & earn store credit points!
Buy your plugins on Black Octopus & earn store credit points!
-
- KVRist
- 344 posts since 29 May, 2001
Brian did write somewhere that he plans more instruments... And talked about doing a sample mangler! Another instant buy for me as a fanboy.
But I think there is only the idea of it. We will see what happens.
I will search YouTube for preset programming tutorials. I really would like to whatch something like this and learn more about programming plasmonic
But I think there is only the idea of it. We will see what happens.
I will search YouTube for preset programming tutorials. I really would like to whatch something like this and learn more about programming plasmonic
-
- KVRist
- 239 posts since 5 Feb, 2014
Amazing.
I expected Plasmonic to be on the metallic side of sounds, but it sounds warm and punchy too. So I bought it.
But: Downloadspeed is down to 2KB/s, so it takes over 2 hours to download the 31,4 MB..WTF?
The demo I downloaded earlier was here in 20 seconds.....
I expected Plasmonic to be on the metallic side of sounds, but it sounds warm and punchy too. So I bought it.
But: Downloadspeed is down to 2KB/s, so it takes over 2 hours to download the 31,4 MB..WTF?
The demo I downloaded earlier was here in 20 seconds.....
-
- KVRist
- 344 posts since 29 May, 2001
I would retry the download. Mine was not slow
