I had the same though initially.....I really like SM2 so why bother with SM one. Then the light came on. If you bought it just to play the presets, its a good deal. They are very inspirational. Think of it as a fully adjustale romplerTricky-Loops wrote: Thu Dec 31, 2020 3:27 pm Despite all the love, I still don't understand why it can't be a different wavetable synth than Synthmaster![]()
As I already have Synthmaster and I don't have any I-phones, I don't see any sense in upgrading (downgrading) to Synthmaster One just to have a smaller synth with the same wavetable features which needs less CPU.![]()
How good is Synthmaster ONE?
-
Scrubbing Monkeys Scrubbing Monkeys https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=397259
- KVRAF
- 1839 posts since 21 Apr, 2017 from Bahia, Brazil
We jumped the fence because it was a fence not be cause the grass was greener.
https://scrubbingmonkeys.bandcamp.com/
https://sites.google.com/view/scrubbing-monkeys
https://scrubbingmonkeys.bandcamp.com/
https://sites.google.com/view/scrubbing-monkeys
-
- KVRist
- 350 posts since 17 Nov, 2012
To answer the question, genre-dependent SyOne is fantastic. Easy (ok, I don't see through all modulations
), CPU-friendly (important!) And sounding really good and powerful.
(A little more exchange in the forum could improve usability. Or a complete overview of all questions and answers.)
Also have Synthmaster and SPlayer, but only work with SyOne.
(A little more exchange in the forum could improve usability. Or a complete overview of all questions and answers.)
Also have Synthmaster and SPlayer, but only work with SyOne.
- Banned
- 3564 posts since 22 Aug, 2019
I never liked the zillions of tabs and modern GUI of Synthmaster.
SO looks more old-skool and intuitive to me.
And being much newer, I assume that the code is more modern and stream-lined than with the old Synthmaster.
SO looks more old-skool and intuitive to me.
And being much newer, I assume that the code is more modern and stream-lined than with the old Synthmaster.
-
- KVRAF
- 7510 posts since 14 Nov, 2006 from Ankara, Turkey
The UI code was newer yes, but the engine was the same.e-crooner wrote: Thu Dec 31, 2020 4:37 pm And being much newer, I assume that the code is more modern and stream-lined than with the old Synthmaster.
and we recently ported all the new code in SM1 to SM 2.9.9, so SynthMaster's workflow is much better now compared to v2.9.8 and below.
Works at KV331 Audio
SynthMaster voted #1 in MusicRadar's "Best Synth of 2019" poll
SynthMaster One voted #4 in MusicRadar's "Best Synth of 2019" poll
SynthMaster voted #1 in MusicRadar's "Best Synth of 2019" poll
SynthMaster One voted #4 in MusicRadar's "Best Synth of 2019" poll
-
- KVRAF
- 3735 posts since 17 Sep, 2016
I believe that is the general idea for the SM 3 development plan, plus a few new features. Bulent has already discussed much of that in these forums...e-crooner wrote: Thu Dec 31, 2020 8:42 pm When it is the same code inside, why even keep both alive? Wouldn't it make things easier for you if you combined both into a single product?
Windows 10 and too many plugins
- Banned
- 3564 posts since 22 Aug, 2019
I see. I have not noticed those discussions...
The biggest obstacle might be the rather different user interfaces, especially the fact that many people prefer the SO in that respect.
The biggest obstacle might be the rather different user interfaces, especially the fact that many people prefer the SO in that respect.
-
- KVRAF
- 3735 posts since 17 Sep, 2016
The comments that Bulent made recently were related to him needing to migrate the updated tech from SM One into SM 2, before starting work on SM 3. His migration efforts resulted in the major SM 2.9.9 update. And now SM 3 is where his attention will be. I think that user interface design in SM 3 will be a major focus.
I'm sure many users prefer one UI or the other, or both. And Bulent previously said the new synth will have more layers, and a wavetable editor, and granular oscillator. That has been the main complaint about SM One having only a single layer, making it too basic for many. But I do find that makes SM One easy to get productive in!
Personally I can't wait to see the new version! Clearly it can't be as simple as SM One, but will be a powerful new synth!
I'm sure many users prefer one UI or the other, or both. And Bulent previously said the new synth will have more layers, and a wavetable editor, and granular oscillator. That has been the main complaint about SM One having only a single layer, making it too basic for many. But I do find that makes SM One easy to get productive in!
Personally I can't wait to see the new version! Clearly it can't be as simple as SM One, but will be a powerful new synth!
Windows 10 and too many plugins
- KVRAF
- 7691 posts since 11 Jun, 2006
as good as any synth and your production skillz
HW SYNTHS [KORG T2EX - AKAI AX80 - YAMAHA SY77 - ENSONIQ VFX]
HW MODULES [OBi M1000 - ROLAND MKS-50 - ROLAND JV880 - KURZ 1000PX]
SW [CHARLATAN - OBXD - OXE - ELEKTRO - MICROTERA - M1 - SURGE - RMiV]
DAW [ENERGY XT2/1U RACK WINXP / MAUDIO 1010LT PCI]
HW MODULES [OBi M1000 - ROLAND MKS-50 - ROLAND JV880 - KURZ 1000PX]
SW [CHARLATAN - OBXD - OXE - ELEKTRO - MICROTERA - M1 - SURGE - RMiV]
DAW [ENERGY XT2/1U RACK WINXP / MAUDIO 1010LT PCI]
- KVRian
- 1314 posts since 7 Apr, 2019 from Canada
I find the synthmaster synths dull to work with; but the times I've had patience with them have been fruitful. They're very good, just boring to work with. I found waves element the funnest to work with, but it's limited and not scalable in the same way.
I don't make audio products anymore. I sell furniture & smart products.
-
- KVRAF
- 2720 posts since 2 Jul, 2010
I imagine that tedious use of menus/tabs comes into it. E.g. I like the sounds I've made on Z3ta 2, but it is rather tedious if using multiple oscillators (because of the way they are tabbed) and setting up modulation (as nearly everything requires the matrix).
- KVRian
- 823 posts since 27 Aug, 2020
I'm one of the few people who actually prefer SM2 to SM1. Admittedly, SM1 greatly benefits from a simplified GUI and workflow, but it's been pretty buggy for me. It once crashed on me so hard I had to re-install it because every time I tried to instantiate the plugin, it would crash my DAW. Reinstalling solved the issue, but I've had some other occasional issues as well. Sounds sweet, but nothing you couldn't coax out of SM2.
Last but not least, the moment you want to move out of the purely subtractive territory, then SM2 is way, way better at this. Two modulators instead of one, comb filters, more routing possibilities, more layers and so on, and so on. If I had to pick just one, I would definitely go with SM2.
Last but not least, the moment you want to move out of the purely subtractive territory, then SM2 is way, way better at this. Two modulators instead of one, comb filters, more routing possibilities, more layers and so on, and so on. If I had to pick just one, I would definitely go with SM2.
- KVRian
- 601 posts since 1 Jan, 2021
I like SMOne. Easy to use, light on CPU, sounds really good. Want to buy it... it's on my wishlist.
-
- KVRAF
- 1819 posts since 10 Mar, 2004
I'll second that. I have both SM1 and SM2 and prefer SM2 any day. SM2 is pretty much my go to synth.crickey13 wrote: Sat Jan 02, 2021 3:54 pm I'm one of the few people who actually prefer SM2 to SM1. Admittedly, SM1 greatly benefits from a simplified GUI and workflow, but it's been pretty buggy for me. It once crashed on me so hard I had to re-install it because every time I tried to instantiate the plugin, it would crash my DAW. Reinstalling solved the issue, but I've had some other occasional issues as well. Sounds sweet, but nothing you couldn't coax out of SM2.
Last but not least, the moment you want to move out of the purely subtractive territory, then SM2 is way, way better at this. Two modulators instead of one, comb filters, more routing possibilities, more layers and so on, and so on. If I had to pick just one, I would definitely go with SM2.
