New Cherry Audio Synth is coming March 15! (Eight Voice)
-
- KVRAF
- 1637 posts since 28 Jul, 2006
I thought Polymode was 29, not 25?
Either way, anything under 40 from Cherry is "buy without even demoing" for me. I'll probably be pulling out the credit card as soon as I wake up on the 15th.
Either way, anything under 40 from Cherry is "buy without even demoing" for me. I'll probably be pulling out the credit card as soon as I wake up on the 15th.
- KVRian
- 849 posts since 11 Mar, 2010
Sounds good!
- KVRAF
- 4886 posts since 3 Jan, 2003 from Vancouver
IIRC, the webpage that wasn't supposed to exist said $29. But it also said XXX presets and it was listed in "bundles" so things might change.
Surely there must be consensus by now...
- addled muppet weed
- 111242 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
ibgcd!
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- Banned
- 6787 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
It’s 2002 actuallybriefcasemanx wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 1:28 am Cool, one that's not Mac only and not priced for the 2005 market from a 2005 company. Sounds good to me!
You make it sound like that’s a bad thing .
If a company is able to survive for more than 20 + years , they must be doing something right .
They don’t choose quantity over quality
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
- KVRian
- 1418 posts since 14 Apr, 2016 from Germany
simmo75 wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 3:09 am You should make it Mac OS only, it’s a well known fact that no Windows users like Oberheim plugins![]()

Intel® Core™ i9-9900K•Cubase 11•Presonus Eris E8 XT•Focusrite Scarlett 18i20 & Octopre•NI Kontrol S61 MK2•Steinberg CC121•Synthesizers: Arturia Casio Korg Roland Yamaha
- addled muppet weed
- 111242 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
AdvancedFollower AdvancedFollower https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=418780
- KVRian
- 1342 posts since 8 May, 2018 from Sweden
It almost seems a bit too "convenient" that CA manages to put out an 8-voice emulation mere weeks after GForce announced theirs. Building their synths on the Voltage Modular framework obviously speeds up development, since it's mostly just a matter of swapping out the various fixed-function blocks to create different synthesizers. For $25, "Generic" building blocks are fine if they sound good, but still one has to wonder how much effort goes into emulating specific characteristics of the originals in terms of filter, oscillators, envelopes etc. Was a real SEM used for reference?
Take a single oscillator, producing a drone. Send it to the wave shaper, altering the tone.
This can be a triangle, Sawtooth or a square. Modulate the pulse width, nobody will care
This can be a triangle, Sawtooth or a square. Modulate the pulse width, nobody will care
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Nobody can bang out a GUI and architecture/modelling like that in 2 weeks. It's pretty safe to say that they've been working on it for a while, and that the release of the Gforce synths has nothing to do with it.
Good for them though, that they release for Windows, and Gforce only served the Mac people. Couldn't have gone better for Cherry Audio.
I think you have a point in wondering about the accuracy of the model though. It seems like Cherry Audio is really releasing a lot of stuff in short time, and, they have their modular framework (I looked a bit into it yesterday), even with an own programming environment, based on Java. So, yeah, it makes me wonder a bit if all over their stuff is basically same(-ish), instead of "real" circuit modelling, and closely modelling the analog counter part.
Good for them though, that they release for Windows, and Gforce only served the Mac people. Couldn't have gone better for Cherry Audio.
I think you have a point in wondering about the accuracy of the model though. It seems like Cherry Audio is really releasing a lot of stuff in short time, and, they have their modular framework (I looked a bit into it yesterday), even with an own programming environment, based on Java. So, yeah, it makes me wonder a bit if all over their stuff is basically same(-ish), instead of "real" circuit modelling, and closely modelling the analog counter part.
- KVRAF
- 37379 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Mark Barton did an excellent Oberheim filter for one of his filter modules - if they based it on that it would be something
-
- KVRAF
- 4066 posts since 22 Aug, 2012
The GUI does state filter by MRBaMUSEd wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 10:33 am Mark Barton did an excellent Oberheim filter for one of his filter modules - if they based it on that it would be something
- KVRAF
- 37379 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
OK that could be awesome - so the filter at least will not be 'generic' (in fact it could be better even than the BX one)
-
- Banned
- 144 posts since 16 Nov, 2020
after GForce buggers pulled Mac only cocksuckery on me, I'll damn sure get this joint.
it also be like 25 bucks versus hundreds of pounds the buggers ask for Mac only. straight kick in the nuts is what I give them.
it also be like 25 bucks versus hundreds of pounds the buggers ask for Mac only. straight kick in the nuts is what I give them.
