I like Pulsar's better; seems richer and fuller to me. Whether it's a more accurate emulation, I have no idea.
If you buy a tape vst today.
- KVRAF
- 7027 posts since 16 Aug, 2017 from UK
As for price. IKM have sales and you can use Jam Points.moshimoshi wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:45 pm I appreciate this might be true, but it's just too expensive and the CPU usage is also a barrier. If it uses convolution then I suspect it is also latent, which is a serious deal breaker for me
- KVRAF
- 7027 posts since 16 Aug, 2017 from UK
Tape Machine Collection 75€ includes transfer fee
viewtopic.php?f=43&t=559257#kvrtopictitle
viewtopic.php?f=43&t=559257#kvrtopictitle
-
- KVRAF
- 5521 posts since 6 May, 2002
Several years ago they had a 4x1 Gear Credits Sale
The Noodlist wrote: Mon Mar 01, 2021 5:22 pmAs for price. IKM have sales and you can use Jam Points.moshimoshi wrote: Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:45 pm I appreciate this might be true, but it's just too expensive and the CPU usage is also a barrier. If it uses convolution then I suspect it is also latent, which is a serious deal breaker for me
Intel Core2 Quad CPU + 4 GIG RAM
-
- KVRist
- 174 posts since 10 Dec, 2017
Anyone have experience with Cubase's stock tape saturation? (Magneto?) How does it compared to paid ones?
- KVRist
- 257 posts since 6 Jul, 2012
I think Magneto II in Cubase sounds amazing and is pretty versatile. People argue if it sounds like tape or not. For me it's just a nice way to color tracks and so cpu efficient.xxchopsueyxx wrote: Fri Mar 05, 2021 6:25 pm Anyone have experience with Cubase's stock tape saturation? (Magneto?) How does it compared to paid ones?
-
- KVRist
- 174 posts since 10 Dec, 2017
How are other Saturation options in Cubase? Maybe I’m wrong but it seems like the Magneto 2 is only recent one whereas other two seem to be older or not updated for many years. I’m very curious about a vintage tape magic and I heard many good things about the IK Tape Machine Collection. But before I spend nearly $100 I’m trying to figure out if it’s worth it..TMaudio wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:54 pmI think Magneto II in Cubase sounds amazing and is pretty versatile. People argue if it sounds like tape or not. For me it's just a nice way to color tracks and so cpu efficient.xxchopsueyxx wrote: Fri Mar 05, 2021 6:25 pm Anyone have experience with Cubase's stock tape saturation? (Magneto?) How does it compared to paid ones?
-
- KVRAF
- 1756 posts since 26 Apr, 2019 from Netherlands
That's why there are demo versions.xxchopsueyxx wrote: Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:46 am But before I spend nearly $100 I’m trying to figure out if it’s worth it..
And there are less expensive tape emulations available that you might like.
- KVRist
- 257 posts since 6 Jul, 2012
For sure as the poster mentioned above this post, you must check out the demos. Find and gather audio demonstrations as well, install your software demos and then start comparing. The other saturation options are OK, they're definitely usable. Magneto II to me though is the special one.xxchopsueyxx wrote: Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:46 amHow are other Saturation options in Cubase? Maybe I’m wrong but it seems like the Magneto 2 is only recent one whereas other two seem to be older or not updated for many years. I’m very curious about a vintage tape magic and I heard many good things about the IK Tape Machine Collection. But before I spend nearly $100 I’m trying to figure out if it’s worth it..TMaudio wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:54 pmI think Magneto II in Cubase sounds amazing and is pretty versatile. People argue if it sounds like tape or not. For me it's just a nice way to color tracks and so cpu efficient.xxchopsueyxx wrote: Fri Mar 05, 2021 6:25 pm Anyone have experience with Cubase's stock tape saturation? (Magneto?) How does it compared to paid ones?
I can't tell you what you'll like more but I can tell you this, the IK tapes will give you something very different than Magneto. VTM too is in the similar category as the IK ones. Do I use those as well? Yes. I like having as many options as possible, but knowing what each one will bring to the table let's me narrow down what I'll use for what so as not to be overwhelmed by options. You can do great work with any of these! If you want different color, then get them all. If you want to chose one over the other, demo demo demo.
-
- KVRist
- 174 posts since 10 Dec, 2017
Thanks for sharing your experience! I've never even seen tapes in real life so I was bit lost what to hear from the differences. Still definitely want to experience my self what the analog goodness is about. At least I'm glad Cubase gives you one option to try! I'll demo the IK tapes, much appreciatedTMaudio wrote: Sun Mar 07, 2021 1:12 pmFor sure as the poster mentioned above this post, you must check out the demos. Find and gather audio demonstrations as well, install your software demos and then start comparing. The other saturation options are OK, they're definitely usable. Magneto II to me though is the special one.xxchopsueyxx wrote: Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:46 amHow are other Saturation options in Cubase? Maybe I’m wrong but it seems like the Magneto 2 is only recent one whereas other two seem to be older or not updated for many years. I’m very curious about a vintage tape magic and I heard many good things about the IK Tape Machine Collection. But before I spend nearly $100 I’m trying to figure out if it’s worth it..TMaudio wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:54 pmI think Magneto II in Cubase sounds amazing and is pretty versatile. People argue if it sounds like tape or not. For me it's just a nice way to color tracks and so cpu efficient.xxchopsueyxx wrote: Fri Mar 05, 2021 6:25 pm Anyone have experience with Cubase's stock tape saturation? (Magneto?) How does it compared to paid ones?
I can't tell you what you'll like more but I can tell you this, the IK tapes will give you something very different than Magneto. VTM too is in the similar category as the IK ones. Do I use those as well? Yes. I like having as many options as possible, but knowing what each one will bring to the table let's me narrow down what I'll use for what so as not to be overwhelmed by options. You can do great work with any of these! If you want different color, then get them all. If you want to chose one over the other, demo demo demo.
-
- KVRAF
- 1863 posts since 11 Apr, 2008
IK Tapes are nothing like Magneto 2. Totally different league imo and besides that, the sound is totally different. I'm not sure if Magneto 2 has improved algos over ancient Magneto 1 or it's just a new GUI. Anyway, in a matter of vibe/retro/emulation or saturation, Steinberg plugins are just ok. For music like country, old-school rock, Magneto 2 should be good enough. Any time I tried it on modern music I always ended up with other tape emu (or no tape at all).xxchopsueyxx wrote: Sun Mar 07, 2021 6:46 amHow are other Saturation options in Cubase? Maybe I’m wrong but it seems like the Magneto 2 is only recent one whereas other two seem to be older or not updated for many years. I’m very curious about a vintage tape magic and I heard many good things about the IK Tape Machine Collection. But before I spend nearly $100 I’m trying to figure out if it’s worth it..TMaudio wrote: Sat Mar 06, 2021 11:54 pmI think Magneto II in Cubase sounds amazing and is pretty versatile. People argue if it sounds like tape or not. For me it's just a nice way to color tracks and so cpu efficient.xxchopsueyxx wrote: Fri Mar 05, 2021 6:25 pm Anyone have experience with Cubase's stock tape saturation? (Magneto?) How does it compared to paid ones?
