I agree. I guess for a lot of people it is not an issue. Atleast me myself would never make something in straight 16ths and then quantize it to 16T, I work directly in the beat I want to do stuff inSascha Franck wrote:Well, no matter what you're saying, triplet quantizing is meant to shuffle things in case you've been using even grooves before.
That's what things are working like in almost all hosts and it's also been what Cubase has been working like before SX.
You could argue that 50% quantizing (straight 16ths or 8ths) is exactly in the middle of 66.66666666% (last triplet) and 33.33333333% (second triplet) quantize values, but musically "shuffle" or "play that 16ths/8ths shuffled" is ALLWAYS meant as "play your offbeat 16ths/8ths" LATER, so they are almost equaling (or exactly equaling) the third triplet of some 16t/8t grid.
Shifting them towards the second triplet makes no sense in 99% of all cases.
Plus, as said, whenever you spot something like this on a sheet, you would NEVER play those shuffled notes approaching the second triplet (unless you want to be fired).
Plus, as said too, it has never been like that in any Cubase prior to SX.
So, whatever you're saying, the way SX is treating 16t right now is wrong for a whole number of aspects.
