You mean like the VST protocol?Acolmiztli wrote:Steinberg because they offer unoriginal, uninventive, over priced, buggy software.
just for fun, worst audio soft developer in history?
-
- Banned
- 6127 posts since 1 Apr, 2004 from Et in Arcadia Ego
-
- KVRAF
- 7316 posts since 7 Mar, 2003
-
- KVRAF
- 4644 posts since 28 Nov, 2002 from Chicago
Wow. Who'd have thought this thread would make 10 pages without being locked.
Someone shot the food. Remember: don't shoot food!
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRian
- 1327 posts since 8 Nov, 2003 from DC
Permit me to, and forgive me for (re)stating the obvious.
As the ballot is written, I vote none of the above (or would if I could). I will neither invalidate the experience of someone who has had a bad time technically or commercially with any of these companies, nor will I elevate any of my personal or more objective complaints about a particular piece of software into a polemic. All of these companies and their respective products have allowed many people to create music that was important to them if not their audience. And all of them probably have disappointed if not actually harmed customers. But, if any of them were truly awful, we would know them, if at all, for their infamy rather than their success.
As the ballot is written, I vote none of the above (or would if I could). I will neither invalidate the experience of someone who has had a bad time technically or commercially with any of these companies, nor will I elevate any of my personal or more objective complaints about a particular piece of software into a polemic. All of these companies and their respective products have allowed many people to create music that was important to them if not their audience. And all of them probably have disappointed if not actually harmed customers. But, if any of them were truly awful, we would know them, if at all, for their infamy rather than their success.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505 - KVRAF
- 8041 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
(yawn)
So who would have thought that the one program to leave the beloved by KVR members, PC platform, would be the one with the most votes?
Now that's a shocker isn't it?
So who would have thought that the one program to leave the beloved by KVR members, PC platform, would be the one with the most votes?
Now that's a shocker isn't it?
-
- KVRian
- 995 posts since 4 Mar, 2004
Like you've never made a serious point here !!ttoz wrote: yeah, let's get all deep and serious about it. NOT
I agree with baseballjg, that's why I didn't/couldn't vote either
BTW if anthony doesn't win Australian Idol there's something inherently wrong with the competition ,
wait a minute what did I just say ?????
--
Parsley sage rosemary and thyme...
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 7936 posts since 18 Feb, 2003 from out there somewhere
erm, good for you that you're even watching it Theo.ttoz wrote:Anthony will win. it's just a matter of four more days to hear the verdict. then i can go around all the forums who bagged him and give shit to everyoneWhoomph wrote: BTW if anthony doesn't win Australian Idol there's something inherently wrong with the competition ,
wait a minute what did I just say ?????
-
- KVRAF
- 3266 posts since 22 Sep, 2003 from under the sun
i guess you're a mac user?eyeknow666 wrote:cakewalk or imageline, cakewalk or imageline, cakewalk or imageline..............???????????
Can I do both?
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 8041 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
I hates me a mac!Wopelka wrote:i guess you're a mac user?eyeknow666 wrote:cakewalk or imageline, cakewalk or imageline, cakewalk or imageline..............???????????
Can I do both?
but I loves me this smiley!
-
- KVRian
- 1278 posts since 24 May, 2004
Voted for emagic because of their corruption (logic for mac) and their indescribable idiotism of releasing EVP88 as a logic plugin only 
-
machinesworking machinesworking https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8505
- KVRAF
- 8041 posts since 15 Aug, 2003 from seattle
It's corrupt for Emagic to be bought out by a larger company? It's corrupt for Apple to not want to develop software for the competition? It's corrupt for Apple to use the EVP88 as another reason to use Logic?timewastin wrote:Voted for emagic because of their corruption (logic for mac) and their indescribable idiotism of releasing EVP88 as a logic plugin only
Capitalism is the name of the game . No company survives without thinking about the bottom line. Do you think any VST or DX company would develop a product that potentially took sales from them?
Why would you expect any less from a corporation?
The Logic hating here is tiring and silly, 99% of the people here are PC, it's like Sonar bashing on a mac site to me, what's the point?