Motorola DSP563xx Emulator (BETA) (Access Virus, Nord Lead, Waldorf MW...)
-
- KVRAF
- 3368 posts since 2 Oct, 2004
That thread has various opinions but doesn't answer the question. Now that we have an emulator that can load ROMs from the different models we can finally do a fully controlled comparison.
Orion Platinum, Muzys 2
-
- KVRAF
- 3368 posts since 2 Oct, 2004
You're right Spire has more high end sheen. The Spire FX section was clearly Virus inspired. It's easy to over do the distortion in Spire, whereas the FX in Virus are limited to more musical ranges. I think the Virus sound is warmer and musical in a late 90's dance music kind of way. Spire is more modern and in your face.chk071 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 14, 2021 11:01 amHard to say... this emulator is my first real contact with it, I only listened to a gazillion of sound demos before. Let's put it like this: Spire sounds more high end, and modern to me. And, I think I do prefer its sound. But, nonetheless I really like the Virus' sound, and also the *Nova's, and the old Waldrof synth's sound.
Spire is my absolute favorite in the synth's I tried hands on though, so, it'd be hard to push it off that spot.
Orion Platinum, Muzys 2
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
Guy posted same patch done on both and some people expanded on that, others continued justifying the myth and some hitting the straw man, if you just go what others are saying, than update the info, B doesn't sound better or different than C.v1o wrote: ↑Sat Jul 17, 2021 12:34 amThat thread has various opinions but doesn't answer the question. Now that we have an emulator that can load ROMs from the different models we can finally do a fully controlled comparison.
https://gearspace.com/board/showpost.ph ... stcount=13
-
- KVRAF
- 35406 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Yes, that's what I always read. The sound engine is exactly the same among all Virus'. The only difference people might have heard are differences in the DAC. Which, obviously, are not there when you use the emulator.
-
- KVRAF
- 1509 posts since 20 Feb, 2003
The differences between A / B / C are down to the features. The A offers half the polyphony, less FX (especially no global reverb) no 3rd osc or LFO, smaller mod matrix etc. So it will sound more different. The good news about that is the Virus A should also use much less CPU in an emulator.. So if you've got crackles Virus A support would probably help..
The C is very similar to the B, but added a per part EQ, which was immediately used to add more high end to sounds, or remove low end from some presets. Thus the likely source of comments that the Virus B "had a fuller sound".
The plugin version (TDM / Powercore) was basically a Virus B, but 16 notes and 4 part per core (instead of 24 note / 16 part of a Virus B) with some of the Virus C arp features. Its big advantage was it could load in preset midi files from the main interface, which effectively gave it unlimited preset storage. Also, if you wanted you could load instances into other cores, so EG a Powercore card's 4 cores would give you upto 64 note poly and 4 global reverb Virus B, with full automation offered for all 4 parts per instance.
BTW If an emulator ever offered full automation, of all 16 parts, it would result in something that would likely have around 5,000 automatable parameters for a Virus B(!)
The C is very similar to the B, but added a per part EQ, which was immediately used to add more high end to sounds, or remove low end from some presets. Thus the likely source of comments that the Virus B "had a fuller sound".
The plugin version (TDM / Powercore) was basically a Virus B, but 16 notes and 4 part per core (instead of 24 note / 16 part of a Virus B) with some of the Virus C arp features. Its big advantage was it could load in preset midi files from the main interface, which effectively gave it unlimited preset storage. Also, if you wanted you could load instances into other cores, so EG a Powercore card's 4 cores would give you upto 64 note poly and 4 global reverb Virus B, with full automation offered for all 4 parts per instance.
BTW If an emulator ever offered full automation, of all 16 parts, it would result in something that would likely have around 5,000 automatable parameters for a Virus B(!)
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
DAC's are same too between B&C, as confirmed by Access, so it's just peoples bias.
-
- KVRAF
- 35406 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Interesting.
I think I might have confused something though. Might have been the Virus A people were talking about, because, it looks like that one has a different DAC than the others, according to this chart: https://synth.market/media/shop_items_d ... _Chart.pdf
I think I might have confused something though. Might have been the Virus A people were talking about, because, it looks like that one has a different DAC than the others, according to this chart: https://synth.market/media/shop_items_d ... _Chart.pdf
-
- KVRian
- 597 posts since 29 Nov, 2005
Who stops at 4? These are all poco Viruses - 384 note polyphony
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- 1509 posts since 20 Feb, 2003
Anyone who uses those since each core supports one 4 part instance:) I know you can load more instances based on the amount of cores you have. Though, if the card you licensed goes kaput, then the whole lot is gone.. Which is why it'd always have been nice to see a native plugin version..
-
- KVRian
- 597 posts since 29 Nov, 2005
Yup, that's why I ended up with so many cards. I had 2 unlimited poco installers and 4 cards, but then a fully loaded x8 appeared for a steal, hence the excess The emulator running Virus B using VirusHC as a controller is already every bit as usable as a poco once its set up.
To fully match the poco the emu needs a GUI that can load patches from sysex banks, separate outs and a means to input audio via a sidechain. It also needs a CPU with hefty single core performance.
With the speed the guys are working on this I don't think it'll be that far away.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 119 posts since 17 Jan, 2021
VST3 will have six channels output / two channels input
- KVRian
- 709 posts since 20 Nov, 2000 from Valencia, Spain
So finally the idea is releasing a different plugin (or edition) with its particular GUI and separate ID for each one of the synths that can be emulated?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 119 posts since 17 Jan, 2021
That has always been the plan