Give me a good reason... [GlissEQ]

VST, AU, etc. plug-in Virtual Effects discussion
KVRAF
4510 posts since 17 Dec, 2009

Post Wed Aug 04, 2021 8:39 am

Wow, Voxengo was really ahead of its time.
GUI looked like that in 2005 and it’s still competitive and looks great.
Image

User avatar
KVRAF
4535 posts since 8 Jul, 2009

Post Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:53 am

What other EQs have the feature to see other tracks in the analyzer? FF ProQ3 does. What else?

KVRAF
3132 posts since 27 Jul, 2004

Post Wed Aug 04, 2021 12:19 pm

plexuss wrote:
Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:53 am
What other EQs have the feature to see other tracks in the analyzer? FF ProQ3 does. What else?
DDMF IIEQ Pro goes way further and gives you control over all used instances from a single window including of course the different spectrums!
Follow me on YouTube: M.o.R FL Studio Tricks
Become a patron: M.o.R FL Studio Tricks

KVRAF
3974 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder

Post Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:06 pm

IIEQ isn't dynamic though. And Pro-Q 3 doesn't have oversampling, or let you set attack and release times. And neither of those have true 64-bit double-precision internal audio processing like Voxengo does. I am biased though :)

PS. I didn't realise the Anwida graphic EQ was so old!

KVRAF
3132 posts since 27 Jul, 2004

Post Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:44 am

MogwaiBoy wrote:
Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:06 pm
IIEQ isn't dynamic though. ...
plexuss asked for an EQ which can show the analyzer of multiple instances... :D
Follow me on YouTube: M.o.R FL Studio Tricks
Become a patron: M.o.R FL Studio Tricks

KVRAF
3974 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder

Post Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:52 am

Trancit wrote:
Thu Aug 05, 2021 2:44 am
MogwaiBoy wrote:
Wed Aug 04, 2021 2:06 pm
IIEQ isn't dynamic though. ...
plexuss asked for an EQ which can show the analyzer of multiple instances... :D
True, sorry :)

KVRist
76 posts since 1 Sep, 2016

Post Thu Aug 05, 2021 8:12 am

plexuss wrote:
Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:53 am
What other EQs have the feature to see other tracks in the analyzer? FF ProQ3 does. What else?
Toneboosters' EQ4 can see the spectrum of any sidechained track.

KVRian
1003 posts since 16 Jan, 2018 from Portland, OR USA

Post Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:59 am

If you're looking for encouragement about buying GlissEQ and in case it helps: when it's Voxengo I don't hesitate for a second. I'd go beyond: get the premium membership and sell 90% of all other plugins you already have. I trust very few developers the way I trust Aleksey.
“In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.”

KVRian
1236 posts since 3 Mar, 2009 from Colorado Springs

Post Thu Aug 05, 2021 7:20 pm

I am a fan of GlissEQ also. I have used it for a lot of things over the years.
My gear & music blog - working link, try it! Featuring guitar amp modeling and (new for 2021) synth content.

User avatar
KVRAF
3713 posts since 7 Sep, 2002

Post Sat Aug 07, 2021 9:28 pm

Ploki wrote:
Wed Aug 04, 2021 8:39 am
Wow, Voxengo was really ahead of its time.
GUI looked like that in 2005 and it’s still competitive and looks great.
The screenshot in this thread is not from 2005. The post just links to our website which serves only the latest screenshots.
Image

KVRAF
4510 posts since 17 Dec, 2009

Post Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:57 pm

Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Sat Aug 07, 2021 9:28 pm

The screenshot in this thread is not from 2005. The post just links to our website which serves only the latest screenshots.
:hihi: Fair enough.
Still - as far as i recall (i first used Voxengo in 2006 maybe?) it was similar to that - except in beige only?
Then later 4 color schemes added?
Image

User avatar
KVRAF
3713 posts since 7 Sep, 2002

Post Sun Aug 08, 2021 2:04 am

Ploki wrote:
Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:57 pm
Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Sat Aug 07, 2021 9:28 pm

The screenshot in this thread is not from 2005. The post just links to our website which serves only the latest screenshots.
:hihi: Fair enough.
Still - as far as i recall (i first used Voxengo in 2006 maybe?) it was similar to that - except in beige only?
Then later 4 color schemes added?
It wasn't too different overall as it's an EQ. Functionality was also similar. I would even say, if it could be ported to 64-bit and Mac, it would still sell a bit. :)
Image

AKJ
KVRAF
1929 posts since 2 Mar, 2004

Post Mon Aug 09, 2021 6:18 am

Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Sun Aug 08, 2021 2:04 am
Ploki wrote:
Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:57 pm
Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Sat Aug 07, 2021 9:28 pm

The screenshot in this thread is not from 2005. The post just links to our website which serves only the latest screenshots.
:hihi: Fair enough.
Still - as far as i recall (i first used Voxengo in 2006 maybe?) it was similar to that - except in beige only?
Then later 4 color schemes added?
It wasn't too different overall as it's an EQ. Functionality was also similar. I would even say, if it could be ported to 64-bit and Mac, it would still sell a bit. :)
What do you mean by that. You ported it to 64-bit and Mac. What you did not port even to its V3 is the really cool feature set of CurveEQ V2. I guess, it would sell a bit more if you re-added these features ;-) (The reintroduction of the Lampthruster algos to HarmoniEQ is well appreciated here and I think CurveEQ deserves the same)

User avatar
KVRAF
3713 posts since 7 Sep, 2002

Post Mon Aug 09, 2021 7:14 am

AKJ wrote:
Mon Aug 09, 2021 6:18 am
Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Sun Aug 08, 2021 2:04 am
Ploki wrote:
Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:57 pm
Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Sat Aug 07, 2021 9:28 pm

The screenshot in this thread is not from 2005. The post just links to our website which serves only the latest screenshots.
:hihi: Fair enough.
Still - as far as i recall (i first used Voxengo in 2006 maybe?) it was similar to that - except in beige only?
Then later 4 color schemes added?
It wasn't too different overall as it's an EQ. Functionality was also similar. I would even say, if it could be ported to 64-bit and Mac, it would still sell a bit. :)
What do you mean by that. You ported it to 64-bit and Mac. What you did not port even to its V3 is the really cool feature set of CurveEQ V2. I guess, it would sell a bit more if you re-added these features ;-) (The reintroduction of the Lampthruster algos to HarmoniEQ is well appreciated here and I think CurveEQ deserves the same)
I mean, the user interface is different now in GlissEQ, not exact copy of version 2.

I personally would not like to add "saturation" options to CurveEQ now, as it's advertised as a "mastering" transparent EQ.
Image

AKJ
KVRAF
1929 posts since 2 Mar, 2004

Post Tue Aug 10, 2021 2:49 am

Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Mon Aug 09, 2021 7:14 am
I personally would not like to add "saturation" options to CurveEQ now, as it's advertised as a "mastering" transparent EQ.
Well, to me CurveEQ in its current state is almost useless (for matching I use the Melda product which has imo a much better workflow). CurveEQ V2, however, is still one of my preferred EQs (the downside being its only 32 bit) with a unique sound when using the vintage processor, saturator and gear match. If one wants it to sound transparent, it is very easy to not activate these. So I do not see any harm in having those as options even if the product is marketed as transparent mastering tool. If you do not reintegrate them in CurveEQ why not make a CurveEQ+ or offer the functionality in a separate plugin. The integration inside an EQ is however preferable as you can then have the visual representation of what's going on in the curve display (as it is implemented in V2). I hope you consider this. Cheers, AKJ

Return to “Effects”