Wow, Voxengo was really ahead of its time.
GUI looked like that in 2005 and it’s still competitive and looks great.
Give me a good reason... [GlissEQ]
-
- KVRAF
- 5948 posts since 8 Jul, 2009
What other EQs have the feature to see other tracks in the analyzer? FF ProQ3 does. What else?
#NONFR Check out my music at Bandcamp 
Free Streaming!
Free music with your support on Patreon | Youtube: Music of Plexus Videos (music videos) | Youtube: Plexus Productions (audio related) Stop whining. Make music.
Free Streaming! Free music with your support on Patreon | Youtube: Music of Plexus Videos (music videos) | Youtube: Plexus Productions (audio related) Stop whining. Make music.
-
- KVRAF
- 4476 posts since 27 Jul, 2004
-
- KVRAF
- 4711 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
IIEQ isn't dynamic though. And Pro-Q 3 doesn't have oversampling, or let you set attack and release times. And neither of those have true 64-bit double-precision internal audio processing like Voxengo does. I am biased though 
PS. I didn't realise the Anwida graphic EQ was so old!
PS. I didn't realise the Anwida graphic EQ was so old!
-
- KVRAF
- 4711 posts since 26 Nov, 2015 from Way Downunder
-
NeonNightflyer NeonNightflyer https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=384912
- KVRist
- 87 posts since 1 Sep, 2016
-
- KVRian
- 1390 posts since 16 Jan, 2018 from Portland, OR USA
If you're looking for encouragement about buying GlissEQ and in case it helps: when it's Voxengo I don't hesitate for a second. I'd go beyond: get the premium membership and sell 90% of all other plugins you already have. I trust very few developers the way I trust Aleksey.
“In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.”
-
- KVRAF
- 1631 posts since 3 Mar, 2009 from Colorado Springs
I am a fan of GlissEQ also. I have used it for a lot of things over the years.
-
- KVRAF
- 4021 posts since 7 Sep, 2002
-
- KVRAF
- 6467 posts since 17 Dec, 2009
Aleksey Vaneev wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:28 am
The screenshot in this thread is not from 2005. The post just links to our website which serves only the latest screenshots.
Fair enough.Still - as far as i recall (i first used Voxengo in 2006 maybe?) it was similar to that - except in beige only?
Then later 4 color schemes added?
-
- KVRAF
- 4021 posts since 7 Sep, 2002
It wasn't too different overall as it's an EQ. Functionality was also similar. I would even say, if it could be ported to 64-bit and Mac, it would still sell a bit.Ploki wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:57 amAleksey Vaneev wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:28 am
The screenshot in this thread is not from 2005. The post just links to our website which serves only the latest screenshots.
Still - as far as i recall (i first used Voxengo in 2006 maybe?) it was similar to that - except in beige only?
Then later 4 color schemes added?
-
- Banned
- 1966 posts since 2 Mar, 2004
What do you mean by that. You ported it to 64-bit and Mac. What you did not port even to its V3 is the really cool feature set of CurveEQ V2. I guess, it would sell a bit more if you re-added these featuresAleksey Vaneev wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 10:04 amIt wasn't too different overall as it's an EQ. Functionality was also similar. I would even say, if it could be ported to 64-bit and Mac, it would still sell a bit.Ploki wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:57 amAleksey Vaneev wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:28 am
The screenshot in this thread is not from 2005. The post just links to our website which serves only the latest screenshots.
Still - as far as i recall (i first used Voxengo in 2006 maybe?) it was similar to that - except in beige only?
Then later 4 color schemes added?
(The reintroduction of the Lampthruster algos to HarmoniEQ is well appreciated here and I think CurveEQ deserves the same)-
- KVRAF
- 4021 posts since 7 Sep, 2002
I mean, the user interface is different now in GlissEQ, not exact copy of version 2.AKJ wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 2:18 pmWhat do you mean by that. You ported it to 64-bit and Mac. What you did not port even to its V3 is the really cool feature set of CurveEQ V2. I guess, it would sell a bit more if you re-added these featuresAleksey Vaneev wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 10:04 amIt wasn't too different overall as it's an EQ. Functionality was also similar. I would even say, if it could be ported to 64-bit and Mac, it would still sell a bit.Ploki wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:57 amAleksey Vaneev wrote: ↑Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:28 am
The screenshot in this thread is not from 2005. The post just links to our website which serves only the latest screenshots.
Still - as far as i recall (i first used Voxengo in 2006 maybe?) it was similar to that - except in beige only?
Then later 4 color schemes added?
I personally would not like to add "saturation" options to CurveEQ now, as it's advertised as a "mastering" transparent EQ.
-
- Banned
- 1966 posts since 2 Mar, 2004
Well, to me CurveEQ in its current state is almost useless (for matching I use the Melda product which has imo a much better workflow). CurveEQ V2, however, is still one of my preferred EQs (the downside being its only 32 bit) with a unique sound when using the vintage processor, saturator and gear match. If one wants it to sound transparent, it is very easy to not activate these. So I do not see any harm in having those as options even if the product is marketed as transparent mastering tool. If you do not reintegrate them in CurveEQ why not make a CurveEQ+ or offer the functionality in a separate plugin. The integration inside an EQ is however preferable as you can then have the visual representation of what's going on in the curve display (as it is implemented in V2). I hope you consider this. Cheers, AKJAleksey Vaneev wrote: ↑Mon Aug 09, 2021 3:14 pm I personally would not like to add "saturation" options to CurveEQ now, as it's advertised as a "mastering" transparent EQ.
