I don't really see the purpose of a "DAW inside a DAW". It would fragment the composition/production process. Why add functionality to a DAW that the DAW already has?
Also, it would only work properly with a 4/4 beat or other simple measures, but once you have measure changes, there's no plug-in format currently that offers sufficient information about the song structure to reliably map a secondary timeline.
What about a DAW ?
-
- u-he
- 30213 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRian
- 834 posts since 7 Dec, 2018 from Saint-Petersburg
No, hell, no... I'm sure people don't need more software layers and new interfaces. We need less, actually 
Modern DAWs have full functionality and if not, they work on that 24/7 and I don't believe U-he needs to put efforts that way. Each new project is a responsibility for people's attention and time.
Modern DAWs have full functionality and if not, they work on that 24/7 and I don't believe U-he needs to put efforts that way. Each new project is a responsibility for people's attention and time.-
- KVRist
- 84 posts since 13 Jul, 2015
This.As plugin it would even have a market, as there is no plugin in this world that would just load midi files and play them.
“I'd far rather be happy than right any day.” ~ Arthur Dent, Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
-
- KVRist
- 30 posts since 19 Jul, 2019
Or synapse and u-he merge ^^ best developers out there imo.THE INTRANCER wrote: Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:33 pm Maybe Richard of Synapse could give his abandoned DAW Orion to Urs.
