does that work? and can I exploit it for experiments? izotope has their mixing stuff where you can invert eq curves as you move them around if the tracks are linked, for example. I'm just thinking about wild sound design possibilities if i have an mxxx on every track and things happen everywhere when i mess around. like when i increase the decay on this reverb, it decreases on this other track, and the release time on this other synth. i can probably set this all up with careful thought and macros, but I thought I'd think out loud on a forum..Which plugins talk to each other across tracks?
-
- KVRer
- 15 posts since 25 Apr, 2020
I picked up MMultianalyzer on sale recently and it got me wondering if there are other melda plugs that can be placed on multiple tracks and have them communicating on the back end? I also own MXXX but have never tried the multianalyze module across tracks, probably because there's so many other things to try when i open MXXX does that work? and can I exploit it for experiments? izotope has their mixing stuff where you can invert eq curves as you move them around if the tracks are linked, for example. I'm just thinking about wild sound design possibilities if i have an mxxx on every track and things happen everywhere when i mess around. like when i increase the decay on this reverb, it decreases on this other track, and the release time on this other synth. i can probably set this all up with careful thought and macros, but I thought I'd think out loud on a forum..
does that work? and can I exploit it for experiments? izotope has their mixing stuff where you can invert eq curves as you move them around if the tracks are linked, for example. I'm just thinking about wild sound design possibilities if i have an mxxx on every track and things happen everywhere when i mess around. like when i increase the decay on this reverb, it decreases on this other track, and the release time on this other synth. i can probably set this all up with careful thought and macros, but I thought I'd think out loud on a forum..-
- KVRian
- 915 posts since 2 May, 2015
...more than likely the "mixing revolution" when it arrives will have a lot of that capability. Currently we basically mix vertically and sum horizontally, with only "side chaining" for limited "horizontal" interactions. Imagine what could be done if we could link across rows of parameters/etc...(sigh)...(soon?)...
.../s~
.../s~mba m2 15" | 16gig.ram | 1tb ssd | macOS 26.1 Tahoe
logic 11.2.2 | reaper 7.75 | cubase 14.0.4
focusrite.2i2 | A&H CQ18t
logic 11.2.2 | reaper 7.75 | cubase 14.0.4
focusrite.2i2 | A&H CQ18t
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122 - KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Yup, correct. MMultiAnalyzer and MAutoAlign are the only ones "talking to each other" at the moment. But in the future, the mixing revolution will need that as well.
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 15 posts since 25 Apr, 2020
cool good to know thanks. I'm going to think about max4live options and macros. I'm imagining the mix revolution as using faders to cut out spectral frequency space in a mix rather than standard volume faders and channel strips. i hope it is something like this. i would like a new option beyond the analog gear paradigms. i like to try and imagine fading in a track via spectral sculpting. or just weighting instruments in terms of frequency space importance and just riding the volume fader for composition reasons and eq and compression strictly for sound designMeldaProduction wrote: Sat Aug 28, 2021 6:44 pm Yup, correct. MMultiAnalyzer and MAutoAlign are the only ones "talking to each other" at the moment. But in the future, the mixing revolution will need that as well.
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Aaaah, true!