i want the same thing. maybe there are more of us ?stefancrs wrote:I want pattern editing, but I want it built in into a "regular" host, like podium or cubase.
cubase with a tracker editor would finally reach maturity it lacks right now
Aodix 4 Released
-
- KVRist
- 197 posts since 21 Jun, 2002 from moon
cubase with a tracker editor would finally reach maturity it lacks right now
-
- KVRian
- 509 posts since 3 Aug, 2002 from berlin
it doesn't have a builed in sampler? right?
that's bad.
IMHO the big advantage of trackers is the builed in sampler and the great way to control it through the sequencer... it makes midi users look like neanderthalers... but a tracker that needs a midi-driven sampler? who needs that?
that's bad.
IMHO the big advantage of trackers is the builed in sampler and the great way to control it through the sequencer... it makes midi users look like neanderthalers... but a tracker that needs a midi-driven sampler? who needs that?
ngfnjhte?
-
- KVRist
- 453 posts since 16 Sep, 2002 from Malaga (Spain)
Just to point that Aodix allows you that also using "Pattern events" wich u can arrange along other events, automation , etc. I think Aodix 4 differs from traditional sequencers in the same amount as differs as traditional trackers (and maybe shares more with traditional sequencers) , anyway comparatioms between them are like compare Apples To Oranges.So that I can put pattern parts in the arrangement (or even just choose to edit in pattern view or piano roll) just like with normal parts
but wtf, it's the beautiful of internet, we have 3000 programs to choose and freedom to use our preferred one, so who cares?
-
- KVRAF
- 4738 posts since 20 Feb, 2004 from Gothenburg, Sweden
Hehe, I know that Aodix uses pattern events etc. But that's not what I'm looking for eventhough Aodix is great. It's just not the program for me, but I hope it is for a lot of people.arguru wrote:Just to point that Aodix allows you that also using "Pattern events" wich u can arrange along other events, automation , etc. I think Aodix 4 differs from traditional sequencers in the same amount as differs as traditional trackers (and maybe shares more with traditional sequencers) , anyway comparatioms between them are like compare Apples To Oranges.So that I can put pattern parts in the arrangement (or even just choose to edit in pattern view or piano roll) just like with normal parts
but wtf, it's the beautiful of internet, we have 3000 programs to choose and freedom to use our preferred one, so who cares?
Stefan H Singer
https://dropshotaudio.com/
https://dropshotaudio.com/
-
- KVRist
- 453 posts since 16 Sep, 2002 from Malaga (Spain)
Of course Stef (hope u find a program suits with you!) Thanks for your words mate.
Btw: me implemeting I/A sampling method probably soon in a new plug. (mm eh? .. I/A .. sounds spooky )
Btw: me implemeting I/A sampling method probably soon in a new plug. (mm eh? .. I/A .. sounds spooky )
-
- KVRAF
- 4738 posts since 20 Feb, 2004 from Gothenburg, Sweden
Cool! Using samples or computed waveforms? (it's a quite effecient way to reduce aliasing in ordinary calculated oscillators as well).arguru wrote:Of course Stef (hope u find a program suits with you!) Thanks for your words mate.
Btw: me implemeting I/A sampling method probably soon in a new plug. (mm eh? .. I/A .. sounds spooky )
Atm Podium is my favourite host
Stefan H Singer
https://dropshotaudio.com/
https://dropshotaudio.com/
-
- KVRAF
- 3338 posts since 1 Sep, 2002
if you played with trackers as long as i did (17 years)
aodix is all i every wanted ( and i mean that )
ok you need to learn a few new things but playing with it for 1 hour and you know every thing you need to know
i tried cubase/fruity/orion and some others
but every time i go back to tracker software
you can see the notes!!
easer to edit
and make a song a lot faster
for people how never used trackers it`s a little more work to learn it but its worth it
Odo.
sorry for the english
aodix is all i every wanted ( and i mean that )
ok you need to learn a few new things but playing with it for 1 hour and you know every thing you need to know
i tried cubase/fruity/orion and some others
but every time i go back to tracker software
you can see the notes!!
easer to edit
and make a song a lot faster
for people how never used trackers it`s a little more work to learn it but its worth it
Odo.
sorry for the english
Make Your Voice Heard!!
EUROPEAN VAPERS PROTEST 29th 2.00PM.It saved my life.
EUROPEAN VAPERS PROTEST 29th 2.00PM.It saved my life.
-
- KVRist
- 133 posts since 19 Jan, 2003
Love to see a new tracker on the scene Although this one is really more like traditional midi sequencer with tracker-style editor than a classic tracker. Lack of internal sample player and tracker effects (like gating, sample reversing and triggering from different points in waveforms...) are the main reason that I wont be using it (this is where Renoise with it's tracker effects improvements excells). But I love high resolution editor and notes represented as draggable and resizable objects, the routing view is also great. And such a simple interface! I'm playing with it for less than an hour and almost totally get it already. I think many "buzzers" which are sick of stability issues might be very happy with this one, as long as they're not freeware fanatics 
Meanwhile I'll be hoping that one day Renoise will get the routing and high resolution sequencer with zooming and stuff like this one
Maybe a few suggestions: It would be nice to be able to drag all selected "notes" around with mouse. And ability to record chords (renoise can do this quite well, it puts notes on subtracks). Oh, and driver selection IMHO doesn't really belong on front panel, because you need this only the first time after installation (usually).
Anyway, best of luck with this one arguru. If there will be a day when you'll add internal sample player and events with tracker effects, I'll grab it like mad Btw., Stardust is already (from when you first presented 1.0 it here) my compressor of choice, especially for bass and drum tracks. Phat!
Although this one is really more like traditional midi sequencer with tracker-style editor than a classic tracker. Lack of internal sample player and tracker effects (like gating, sample reversing and triggering from different points in waveforms...) are the main reason that I wont be using it (this is where Renoise with it's tracker effects improvements excells). But I love high resolution editor and notes represented as draggable and resizable objects, the routing view is also great. And such a simple interface! I'm playing with it for less than an hour and almost totally get it already. I think many "buzzers" which are sick of stability issues might be very happy with this one, as long as they're not freeware fanatics Meanwhile I'll be hoping that one day Renoise will get the routing and high resolution sequencer with zooming and stuff like this one Maybe a few suggestions: It would be nice to be able to drag all selected "notes" around with mouse. And ability to record chords (renoise can do this quite well, it puts notes on subtracks). Oh, and driver selection IMHO doesn't really belong on front panel, because you need this only the first time after installation (usually
).Anyway, best of luck with this one arguru. If there will be a day when you'll add internal sample player and events with tracker effects, I'll grab it like mad
Btw., Stardust is already (from when you first presented 1.0 it here) my compressor of choice, especially for bass and drum tracks. Phat!-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 243 posts since 20 Aug, 2003
Aodix records chords, try it.tha_man wrote: Maybe a few suggestions: It would be nice to be able to drag all selected "notes" around with mouse. And ability to record chords (renoise can do this quite well, it puts notes on subtracks). Oh, and driver selection IMHO doesn't really belong on front panel, because you need this only the first time after installation (usually
Anyway, best of luck with this one arguru. If there will be a day when you'll add internal sample player and events with tracker effects, I'll grab it like mad
And I Also think that driver selection doesn't belong on the front panel.
-
- KVRAF
- 3139 posts since 6 Sep, 2002 from United Kingdom & Opinions Will Travel :O)
Or change your name to everything SuxxxGoaFruity wrote:it lacks piano roll , no good.
Best regards,
Spe3d
:O)
-
- KVRAF
- 3338 posts since 1 Sep, 2002
hi GoaFruity
have you tried it ?
o never understand why piano rolles are better
in aodix you can better see what your doing
or not ?
Odo.
have you tried it ?
o never understand why piano rolles are better
in aodix you can better see what your doing
or not ?
Odo.
Make Your Voice Heard!!
EUROPEAN VAPERS PROTEST 29th 2.00PM.It saved my life.
EUROPEAN VAPERS PROTEST 29th 2.00PM.It saved my life.
-
- KVRer
- 25 posts since 28 Nov, 2004
yes mate ive tried it , its very good since its modularodo wrote:hi GoaFruity
have you tried it ?
o never understand why piano rolles are better
in aodix you can better see what your doing
or not ?
Odo.
, but Aodix its still new , a piano roll would be better since its a very popular tool nowadays if Arguru is thinking about making one he might consider winning some more users Aodix is just in the beginning..
-
- KVRian
- 619 posts since 15 Feb, 2004 from Birmingham, UK
Yeah, I think piano roll definately has its uses. When building a modern tracker it would seem like a good idea to include a piano roll alongside the traditional tracker-input... BuzzLE will have a piano roll if it'll ever near completion...