And yes, wow are the groupings oddly arbitrary and inconsistent - it's almost trying to be alphabetical in some areas but gives up as it started so badly to begin with
Anyway, it's something I hope they work on in the future.
Coming Soon: RX 9
-
- KVRist
- 335 posts since 10 Apr, 2002
I've not got any old plugin presets to be fair, I use most of my plugins in Sound Forge / WaveLab. It would be just nice to use the occasional plugin easily. With a search function like Reaper or Bitwig where you just start typing the name for a filtered list.
And yes, wow are the groupings oddly arbitrary and inconsistent - it's almost trying to be alphabetical in some areas but gives up as it started so badly to begin with
Anyway, it's something I hope they work on in the future.
And yes, wow are the groupings oddly arbitrary and inconsistent - it's almost trying to be alphabetical in some areas but gives up as it started so badly to begin with
Anyway, it's something I hope they work on in the future.
-
- KVRAF
- 2035 posts since 30 Mar, 2008 from MN, USA
Unfortunately, RX 8 is buggy as hell on an M1, and iZotope has no intention of fixing it. Crash city to the point of being unusable. As of RX 9.1.1 things seem pretty stable. So I was basically forced to update. But I waited until Cyber Monday.
CLAP Software Database: https://clapdb.tech. KVR Discussion Topic.
-
- KVRAF
- 1583 posts since 26 Aug, 2019
Saw that one coming a mile away about RX 8 so I upgraded as soon as 9 was available. No regrets. That's the only iZotope software I installed on my M1 and I have most of their offerings. I love RX but not so fond of anything else. Considering selling off the rest, well Trash 2 & Iris have no real resale value and I would hold out hope for a Trash 3.
-
- KVRAF
- 2140 posts since 16 Jan, 2013 from USA
Does RX or Acoustica do a better job of restoration? I have RX 8 and have used several versions before that and it's always been pretty damn good at it. Leaving material in much better shape without destroying the EQ. That to me is it's bread and butter. If anyone says Acoustica is better for that, I'll take a look, otherwise it's a non-starter.
-
- KVRAF
- 3362 posts since 31 Dec, 2004 from People's Republic of Minnesota
Strange. Which OS you on? I'm on Big Sur and have used it quite a bit and I think it crashed once. I have a free license for V9 but I haven't had any desire to install it yet.teilo wrote: Thu Dec 02, 2021 1:47 pm Unfortunately, RX 8 is buggy as hell on an M1, and iZotope has no intention of fixing it. Crash city to the point of being unusable. As of RX 9.1.1 things seem pretty stable. So I was basically forced to update. But I waited until Cyber Monday.
-
- Banned
- 1966 posts since 2 Mar, 2004
RX Standard offers a more (restauration) features/functionality than Acoustica (not to speak of RX Advanced). The Acoustica restauration suite which I have (just de-click, de-noise, de-hum, de-clip) is good though (but limited). Sometime I get better results with RX sometimes with the Acoustica restauration suite.jonljacobi wrote: Fri Dec 03, 2021 11:06 pm Does RX or Acoustica do a better job of restoration? I have RX 8 and have used several versions before that and it's always been pretty damn good at it. Leaving material in much better shape without destroying the EQ. That to me is it's bread and butter. If anyone says Acoustica is better for that, I'll take a look, otherwise it's a non-starter.
-
- KVRAF
- 3407 posts since 6 Nov, 2006
RX9 on monterey/ARM - the plug in scanner needs a look. weird behavior and doesn't indicate it's actually scanning so just have to sit and wait forever then check in and see if the [unscanned] denotation is removed from the window.
i think in previous versions there was some kind of progress bar or at least a beachball but nothing in 9.
i think in previous versions there was some kind of progress bar or at least a beachball but nothing in 9.