Discovery Pro synthesizer 6.4 to 8.0

[classic]

Yeah, could be. By the way we ofer cross-grades from Discovery to Pro for a very fair price, so no pressures there.

Where can I find such an crossgrade offer?

[discoDSP]

At discoDSP Members Area https://www.discodsp.com/members/

[Vortifex]

Ok, please send the FL project and I'll take a deeper look. It happens with both VST2 and VST3 right?

The issue isn't project specific. The master volume just doesn't work properly in FL Studio full stop. The issue affects both VST2 and VST3. I really don't know what else to tell you.

[discoDSP]

It’s a host specific issue, not much we can do about it until we update the JUCE framework.

[Gadget Fiend]

You claim to have built a Nord 1/2/2X replacement and yet none of your presets sound even remotely Nord-like. Moreover, you have to rely on layering patches in Performance mode to get an even mildly fat, robust sound (something that is not necessary on the Nord).

Your company is engaging in the worst sort of bait and switch campaign . You sucker in users by presenting a UI that looks similar to a Nord 2. But you don't deliver anything close to the Nord 2 sound.

Quite pretending you've developed a Nord replacement and at least create your own custom interface. Stop ripping off the hard work and intellectual property that Clavia engineers and designers put into the Nord 1/2.

[AnX]

. Stop ripping off the hard work and intellectual property that Nord engineers and designers put into the Nord 1/2.

I'm sure Nord are big enough to sort their own problems, if they have any.

[Gadget Fiend]

. Stop ripping off the hard work and intellectual property that Clavia engineers and designers put into the Nord 1/2.

I'm sure Clavia are big enough to sort their own problems, if they have any.

Clavia should have sued the sh!t out of DiscoDSP when they first ripped off the Nord 1.

[gentleclockdivider]

You claim to have built a Nord 1/2/2X replacement and yet none of your presets sound even remotely Nord-like. Moreover, you have to rely on layering patches in Performance mode to get an even mildly fat, robust sound (something that is not necessary on the Nord).

Your company is engaging in the worst sort of bait and switch campaign . You sucker in users by presenting a UI that looks similar to a Nord 2. But you don't deliver anything close to the Nord 2 sound.

Quite pretending you've developed a Nord replacement and at least create your own custom interface. Stop ripping off the hard work and intellectual property that Nord engineers and designers put into the Nord 1/2.

The original coder of discovery has passed away 15+ years ago .
Disco dsp is just maintaining the code
+ improvements .
Clavia doesn't have to sue shit , the orifginal discovery was blue , thus no gui trademark and completely different code .
The only good emulation disco dsp has is the obxd , which again id not coded by disco dsp but by DATsounds( (open source )

[Gadget Fiend]

You claim to have built a Nord 1/2/2X replacement and yet none of your presets sound even remotely Nord-like. Moreover, you have to rely on layering patches in Performance mode to get an even mildly fat, robust sound (something that is not necessary on the Nord).

Your company is engaging in the worst sort of bait and switch campaign . You sucker in users by presenting a UI that looks similar to a Nord 2. But you don't deliver anything close to the Nord 2 sound.

Quite pretending you've developed a Nord replacement and at least create your own custom interface. Stop ripping off the hard work and intellectual property that Nord engineers and designers put into the Nord 1/2.

The original coder of discovery has passed away 15+ years ago .
Disco dsp is just maintaining the code
+ improvements .
Clavia doesn't have to sue shit , the orifginal discovery was blue , thus no gui trademark and completely different code .
The only good emulation disco dsp has is the obxd , which again id not coded by disco dsp but by DATsounds( (open source )

Regardless of whether the original developer died 15 years ago, DiscoDSP is still perpetrating a fraud. Claivia should sue them out of existence to set a precedence that you can't just go around ripping off companies' code and intellectual property and selling an inferior product based on that intellectual property (regardless of whether you reverse engineer the code or change the color scheme of the nearly identical interface).

[fmr]

Regardless of whether the original developer died 15 years ago, DiscoDSP is still perpetrating a fraud. Claivia should sue them out of existence to set a precedence that you can't just go around ripping off companies' code and intellectual property and selling an inferior product based on that intellectual property (regardless of whether you reverse engineer the code or change the color scheme of the nearly identical interface).

First you say they are just "pretending", then you say they are "ripping off" the work of Clavia. You have to make up your mind: Either they are just "pretending" (in which case they can't be "ripping" anything) or they are indeed closer to the real thing (in which case they are not "pretending").

In any case, which would be the legal basis for Clavia to sue them? Anyone can imitate anything. Ideas are not copyrightable. The only basis for Clavia would be if they had, somehow, disassembled the original chips and extracted the DSP code. And they would need to prove that.

[Gadget Fiend]

Regardless of whether the original developer died 15 years ago, DiscoDSP is still perpetrating a fraud. Claivia should sue them out of existence to set a precedence that you can't just go around ripping off companies' code and intellectual property and selling an inferior product based on that intellectual property (regardless of whether you reverse engineer the code or change the color scheme of the nearly identical interface).

First you say they are just "pretending", then you say they are "ripping off" the work of Clavia. You have to make up your mind: Either they are just "pretending" (in which case they can't be "ripping" anything) or they are indeed closer to the real thing (in which case they are not "pretending").

In any case, which would be the legal basis for Clavia to sue them? Anyone can imitate anything. Ideas are not copyrightable. The only basis for Clavia would be if they had, somehow, disassembled the original chips and extracted the DSP code. And they w1t.ould need to prove that.

I can see you've never been in a legal fight (good for you). It isn't what you can prove to the letter of the law, but the leverage you can bring. Clavia can easily show a jury a set of DiscoveryPRO screenshots that copy the Clavia designs (which are Clavia's intellectual property). That's enough to persuade any juror that DiscoDSP is guilty of copyright infringement and fraud.

My girlfriend is an attorney. So I pick up on some of this sh!t.

[discoDSP]

Take it easy, Clavia already contacted us long time ago.

[fmr]

Clavia can easily show a jury a set of DiscoveryPRO screenshots that copy the Clavia designs (which are Clavia's intellectual property). That's enough to persuade any juror that DiscoDSP is guilty of copyright infringement and fraud.

I have many doubts about that. A jury (and a judge) that would be persuaded with solely a bunch of screenshots would do a very lousy job. And the skin is the easiest part to be replaced.

[yobare]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kq5YIQdXSMA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T85NixrzD1E

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sx4tL0zL54

[AnX]

. Stop ripping off the hard work and intellectual property that Clavia engineers and designers put into the Nord 1/2.

I'm sure Clavia are big enough to sort their own problems, if they have any.

Clavia should have sued the sh!t out of DiscoDSP when they first ripped off the Nord 1.

But they didn't, and it's none of your concern. Move on....