Best Roland JP 8000 / 8080 VST Alternative
- KVRist
- 172 posts since 15 Apr, 2016 from Germany
A huge part of the jp8k sound doesn’t just lie in the oscillators. Good or bad by today’s standards - the filter has a unique character and the bass/treble tone controls further change the character quite a bit too... I’m not sure every aspect of the original has been fully replicated but there’s some very close alternatives... even Synth1 proved to be pretty good!
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Yeah. Shame that u-he didn't also implement the JP-8k's filter in Diva, alongside the oscillators.fallacy wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 12:35 pm A huge part of the jp8k sound doesn’t just lie in the oscillators. Good or bad by today’s standards - the filter has a unique character
-
- KVRist
- 59 posts since 12 Oct, 2015
To be fair, the JP-8k filter would feel out of place in that set of filters. I'd love to see a Diva-style implementation filled with digital modules of the era, like the JP-80x0, AN1x, Supernova II, the Nord Leads, the classic Virus A-C lineup, etc.chk071 wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 12:41 pmYeah. Shame that u-he didn't also implement the JP-8k's filter in Diva, alongside the oscillators.fallacy wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 12:35 pm A huge part of the jp8k sound doesn’t just lie in the oscillators. Good or bad by today’s standards - the filter has a unique character
-
- KVRist
- 171 posts since 8 Jun, 2019
I still remember people trashing the Virus filters.fdigl wrote: Sat Jul 25, 2020 3:53 amTo be fair, the JP-8k filter would feel out of place in that set of filters. I'd love to see a Diva-style implementation filled with digital modules of the era, like the JP-80x0, AN1x, Supernova II, the Nord Leads, the classic Virus A-C lineup, etc.chk071 wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 12:41 pmYeah. Shame that u-he didn't also implement the JP-8k's filter in Diva, alongside the oscillators.fallacy wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 12:35 pm A huge part of the jp8k sound doesn’t just lie in the oscillators. Good or bad by today’s standards - the filter has a unique character
Has anyone made wavetables in Serum format using the Supernova or FS1R formants? I know some popular tables like Modern Talking were made using Nord Modular ones.
-
hurricaneaudiolab hurricaneaudiolab https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=424432
- KVRist
- 440 posts since 15 Aug, 2018
- KVRAF
- 2575 posts since 25 Apr, 2009 from gone
B sounds like it’s blurried in comparison.
The detune is different, less focused, and the attack is simply gone.
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
We actually did a guessing contest here: viewtopic.php?p=8218523#p8218523 
Not sure why he's registered here two times, but, hey.
Not sure why he's registered here two times, but, hey.
-
hurricaneaudiolab hurricaneaudiolab https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=424432
- KVRist
- 440 posts since 15 Aug, 2018
Hive does an amazing and super close JP-80x0 impression.chk071 wrote: Tue Nov 30, 2021 12:12 am We actually did a guessing contest here: viewtopic.php?p=8218523#p8218523
Not sure why he's registered here two times, but, hey.
And I registered twice by accident and simply decided to pick one and use it from now on.
- KVRAF
- 2575 posts since 25 Apr, 2009 from gone
My personal way is not to give a sh!t about what emulates what properly and simply pick up whatever gives the best results in my songs, as I’ve never in my whole life heard any listener saying "I love this song because there’s a 100% accurate (replace with what you want here) JP8000 emulation".
But I totally understand that some people dream about being able to recreate those sounds accurately. I’ve been though this sometimes.
Thanks for this comparison, now I know I’ve strictly no reason to try again with any JP80x0 emulation. That’s definitely not what I’m looking for. My supersaws lie somewhere else.
But I totally understand that some people dream about being able to recreate those sounds accurately. I’ve been though this sometimes.
Thanks for this comparison, now I know I’ve strictly no reason to try again with any JP80x0 emulation. That’s definitely not what I’m looking for. My supersaws lie somewhere else.
-
- KVRAF
- 1863 posts since 11 Apr, 2008
About Synth1: It may sounds good in separation, but when you put it next to any modern synths or JP, it sounds flat, lifeless, one-dimensional.fallacy wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2020 12:35 pm A huge part of the jp8k sound doesn’t just lie in the oscillators. Good or bad by today’s standards - the filter has a unique character and the bass/treble tone controls further change the character quite a bit too... I’m not sure every aspect of the original has been fully replicated but there’s some very close alternatives... even Synth1 proved to be pretty good!
Once I followed tutorial how to make a huge pad like in Rank1 track and it was very impressive. I was like "wow, this is it!". Then I put it next to other synths and I was like "ouch, it sounds embarrassing in comparison"
Probably lots of processing would bring some life to Synth1 but it's not the point.
- KVRian
- 920 posts since 12 Jan, 2004 from Boston, MA
Speak truth to power!DJErmac wrote: Tue Nov 30, 2021 5:53 am My personal way is not to give a sh!t about what emulates what properly and simply pick up whatever gives the best results in my songs, as I’ve never in my whole life heard any listener saying "I love this song because there’s a 100% accurate (replace with what you want here) JP8000 emulation".
...buuuuuuuut: I really do think there is something to be said in favor of "proper" modeling. Even if, like you, I don't care if they "nail the sound exactly," there is definitely a difference in the "character of the sound" between modeled synths and non-modeled. There's noticeably more life and vibrance to the models.
...Whether you can hear that in a mix or not is another matter, but--perhaps because I like thin mixes--to me, it definitely matters.
Note: I am not saying you're wrong. In fact, I agree with you. This just falls under the "whatever gives the best results" clause. ...I just think it's worth pointing out that, to give one clear example: Zebra HZ, when used with the new filters, sounds better than plain-old Zebra. It just does, regardless of what it's modeling. ...but the fact that it IS modeling definitely seems to make a difference.
(Not to say that plain-old Zebra sounds bad! It doesn't. I still use it, when I want something "clean" or if I'm in a heavy mix and the details don't matter, since it's easier on the CPU. AUGH! Communication is complicated.)
