What do you want to see in V16?

[vanerio]

I would like to see 1-shot mode for plugins like mtremolo

You can get this via a modulator in envelope mode. But only MTremoloMB has modulators, so you'd have to buy that.

You are right, but the precision is not as good. I tested it. This option would be really nice in the main tremolo.

[vanerio]

Here you have a comparison between main tremolo (green) and modulator (red).

tremolo vs mod.jpg

Precision is very important for me when sound designing, that is the reason why I miss 1-shot reset, like other Melda plugins have.

(it may look that the curve is not the same, but it is just an optical illusion as the curve on the bottom is in a wider window and it got stretched)

[Held]

I see. I was thinking about modulating the depth parameter with the envelope, but that would also be difficult to get just right.

Although, looking at your image, I'd say the real feature request is make the modulator more accurate.

[Hexspa]

Not sure if someone else mentioned it but here's a long shot: amp profiling.

If it started with Kemper, now Neural DSP has a version - as far as I know, there's no desktop/hardware-independent profiling software. Melda could be the first!

[Svama]

Multiple sidechain possibility like Cubase 11 frequency 2.

[Svama]

Some of the Kirchhoff eq features for mautodynamiceq:

1. Two way threshold above and below for dynamic equing
2. Detect/Relative Envelope Detection
“Let us imagine a simple case: we are playing an audio clip in which sounds around 1khz are 9 dB. You may think "The 1khz range is over powering, We should reduce the 1khz But we should also consider the overall level. If the whole audio is 30 dB, you would not feel that 1khz is too much, instead you may feel it's not enough. The better criteria to determine whether a band's volume is high or low is its relative portion in overall volume envelope, instead of only its absolute dB value.

Thereby we introduce "Detect/Relative Envelope Detection" in Kirchhoff-EQ. The dynamics are affected by both current frequency band and relative portion to a "Relative" band. The contribution of Relative Envelope Detection to dynamics is also adjustable: when set to 0%, it degrades as a normal dynamic EQ; and when set to 100%, the amount of dynamics is fully calculated from the relative portion.

The “detect” band is set according to the frequency and Q of the band by default, “Relative” is the whole audio envelope by default. But they can be set freely.”
3. Filter types continuously variable from 12 dB/oct to 96 dB/oct;

[zerocrossing]

I’d like to see some interesting ZDF emulated filters. Not the usual stuff that’s been done to death, but maybe Polyvoks or something else with a lot of character. Something that really takes audio rate modulation well.

[smadger]

Multiple sidechain possibility like Cubase 11 frequency 2.

MXXX has a 6 input option. Not saying that solves the problem, but might be useful to know.

[Dirtgrain]

Resynthesis
An instrument where one can select parts of a spectral image to edit and make sounds--like Iris 2 or Spectral Layers (not an instrument, but nice editor).

[syurin]

Effective processing may be limited, but it would be great if we could reduce the load on the CPU by using gpgpu or load balancing with LAN-connected machines.

[XComposer]

Resynthesis
An instrument where one can select parts of a spectral image to edit and make sounds--like Iris 2 or Spectral Layers (not an instrument, but nice editor).

Yes, I agree strongly! Or as in Photosounder. And including spectral repair, like in iZotope RX. I currently do it in Photosounder, by opening the sound in the Lossless mode, exporting the resulting spectrum image (without closing anything in Photosounder), opening it in an image editor like Inpaint or GIMP or G'MIC, removing the unwanted detail, running an image repair command in the image editor, saving and then re-importing the image in Photosounder and resynthesizing the sound from the repaired image: it would be great to be able to do it within a Melda audio software directly.

[Nspace]

Resynthesis
An instrument where one can select parts of a spectral image to edit and make sounds--like Iris 2 or Spectral Layers (not an instrument, but nice editor).

Yes, I agree strongly! Or as in Photosounder. And including spectral repair, like in iZotope RX. I currently do it in Photosounder, by opening the sound in the Lossless mode, exporting the resulting spectrum image (without closing anything in Photosounder), opening it in an image editor like Inpaint or GIMP or G'MIC, removing the unwanted detail, running an image repair command in the image editor, saving and then re-importing the image in Photosounder and resynthesizing the sound from the repaired image: it would be great to be able to do it within a Melda audio software directly.

Actually, having this conversation at Melda forum here but citing that sequence of spectral features linked to their unique software tool providers, comes as sort of spilling the beans about it all.
Your recount is identical to what I would select, would only add some Franzis visual effects, a wacom tablet plus back at the audio world, complement with varied audio defilter, dereverb or denoise plugins...

Lets put things in perspective here.
All that precise spectral naming to put an end (if it ever ends) to the elusive golden goose of the audio substraction perfect route, well don.
But to place that large burden in Melda would be totally misguided and a bit unfair really...
After the many directions Vojtech was pulled with MSF's development, surely several of us here would expect him to devote his efforts into his own longstanding projects like Mixing Revolution and continue updating, integrating and evolving the other existing platforms, as he has been doing, thankfully.

[smadger]

I really don't understand. Why do people think that making suggestions for features they'd like to see, in a paid product, is somehow unfair and misguided?

Is it unfair to let Microsoft know of a feature you'd like? Is it unreasonable to suggest a feature to Steinberg or Ableton if you buy Cubase or Live?

I don't see anybody demanding anything here, these are all just suggestions, everything is done with respect. And if Vojtech or anybody doesn't want to implement them, then that's absolutely fine too. Or am I reading these things wrong?

[Nspace]

I really don't understand. Why do people think that making suggestions for features they'd like to see, in a paid product, is somehow unfair and misguided?

Is it unfair to let Microsoft know of a feature you'd like? Is it unreasonable to suggest a feature to Steinberg or Ableton if you buy Cubase or Live?

I don't see anybody demanding anything here, these are all just suggestions, everything is done with respect. And if Vojtech or anybody doesn't want to implement them, then that's absolutely fine too. Or am I reading these things wrong?

Ok, saying "totally misguided and unfair" was probably a too strong wording to underline an opinion.

That said, misguiding in the sense that to divert developer precious time and growth efforts into a very different and specialized field, could effectively be in detriment to the existing list of To-Do things.
I've been following both Divideframe's Robin Lobel(Spectralayers) and Photosounder's Michel Rouzic along the years and they had been quite dedicated to each of their fields, Celemony's Melodyne founder too (missed from the list above).
Within time passing and each release version, one understands how that very useful chain of different and complex spectral tools mentioned on the post above has come to be and continues to evolve.

Unfair? asking for yet additional completely different capacities to the widely varied features already incorporated in the many MeldaProduction tools... If such requests come as "It's not enough", then it would be so. Otherwise if it meant to give courage and aim to venture into new territories, then would fit in this thread. meThinks

//So yes, your request probably wont divert Vojtech efforts, while my response could help prevent such expectations extend too much.

[Svama]

Mid/Side, Left/Right to decide independent for every band inside eqs