MAutoAlign - Orchestra recording - varying delays on every analysis
-
- KVRist
- 373 posts since 13 Jul, 2003 from Berlin
Hi there,
this is probably something that I don't understand and I would like to clarify why it's happening.
I have a recording of an orchestra with 23 mics, instantiated MAA on all tracks and hit analyse. Everytime I do so MAA calculates a different delay.
I find this confusing, why is it happening - I mean the mics are static and nothing changes within that same take...?
And a second question: in this case, shouldn't the center microphone of the Decca tree be set as the "master track" and align all others to that one?
When I group only the three Decca Tree mics together, the MAA instance of the right channel consistently gets a delay of 0 while the left and center channel get delayed. I know for the end result it doesn't really matter to which one the signal gets aligned, however, my OCD tells me that the center mic should not have any delay and the others should be phase aligned to that one.
-W
this is probably something that I don't understand and I would like to clarify why it's happening.
I have a recording of an orchestra with 23 mics, instantiated MAA on all tracks and hit analyse. Everytime I do so MAA calculates a different delay.
I find this confusing, why is it happening - I mean the mics are static and nothing changes within that same take...?
And a second question: in this case, shouldn't the center microphone of the Decca tree be set as the "master track" and align all others to that one?
When I group only the three Decca Tree mics together, the MAA instance of the right channel consistently gets a delay of 0 while the left and center channel get delayed. I know for the end result it doesn't really matter to which one the signal gets aligned, however, my OCD tells me that the center mic should not have any delay and the others should be phase aligned to that one.
-W
-
- KVRist
- 308 posts since 11 Jul, 2016
If you do a search for MAutoAlign you'll find a number of threads regarding this topic and how to use the plugin. Basically, MAA is for aligning close mics and automatically picks the best settings for you. You can't set an instance to be the "master".
Incidentally, Nugen Audio has a free plugin called Aligner which does allow you to set the "master" instance. They recently had a survey and gave away the plugin for filling it out. I'm not sure if it's still active or not though...
Incidentally, Nugen Audio has a free plugin called Aligner which does allow you to set the "master" instance. They recently had a survey and gave away the plugin for filling it out. I'm not sure if it's still active or not though...
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 373 posts since 13 Jul, 2003 from Berlin
What confuses me, is that MAA picks a different delay setting every time I hit analyse. Shouldn't "the best setting" be the consistent result everytime it analyzes the same audio? Sort of like a hash is always the same when the input is the same?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 373 posts since 13 Jul, 2003 from Berlin
Thanks for the follow up.
Many samples different (in the hundreds) and several miliseconds different every time.
MAA is the first plugin in every channel. Perhaps I do a test and remove all the EQs that are after the MAA in the channels (mostly just low cuts on the direct mics), but really this shouldn't make a difference as the signal of each channel should (...) hit the plugin at the same time. But I haven't written the host (Logic) myself, so I can't guarantee that it's doing it, however, I do trust the developers of Logic to not have screwed that up.
Many samples different (in the hundreds) and several miliseconds different every time.
MAA is the first plugin in every channel. Perhaps I do a test and remove all the EQs that are after the MAA in the channels (mostly just low cuts on the direct mics), but really this shouldn't make a difference as the signal of each channel should (...) hit the plugin at the same time. But I haven't written the host (Logic) myself, so I can't guarantee that it's doing it, however, I do trust the developers of Logic to not have screwed that up.
-
- KVRist
- 370 posts since 26 Sep, 2014
I'm pretty sure that ANY plugin introduces more than zero latency (however small). This could throw off MAA (I think).
Maybe try putting MAA as the LAST plugin on every channel instead of the first. Then, in theory, any latencies, which could be different for each channel, would be "accounted for".
Know what I mean? Worth a try!
Maybe try putting MAA as the LAST plugin on every channel instead of the first. Then, in theory, any latencies, which could be different for each channel, would be "accounted for".
Know what I mean? Worth a try!
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 373 posts since 13 Jul, 2003 from Berlin
Hmmm... that would mean that the host isn't handling plugin latency correctly. I doubt it. And if I recall correctly in the MAA documentation it said to instantiate it in the first slot.
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
It all depends on what you are analyzing - I assume you have a mic on each instrument, or a grid of "overheads" (if we can call it that way). In that case it cannot really work well, because the mics are actually recording different instruments. MAutoAlign only makes sense if you have one instrument recorded by multiple mics, so that there is an actual physical delay. In your case there is no "solution" for the phase difference equations, since every signal is basically uncorrelated, so the plugin just chooses the "best fit", which most likely sucks.
So a general rule of thumb: Use MAutoAlign only for mics recording the same instrument and all of them from a near proximity (since ambience becomes uncorrelated again).
So a general rule of thumb: Use MAutoAlign only for mics recording the same instrument and all of them from a near proximity (since ambience becomes uncorrelated again).
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 373 posts since 13 Jul, 2003 from Berlin
Ah, now I understand.
Yes, orchestral recordings are multiple (many) microphones, some of them for all instruments (Decca tree, outriggers, etc...) some of them "direct" mics on the sections, and also single mics for the section leaders.
Ok, so for this use case I don't need MAA.
The numbers and clearly logically thinking about it should have told me, but sometimes excitement gets in the way.
Yes, orchestral recordings are multiple (many) microphones, some of them for all instruments (Decca tree, outriggers, etc...) some of them "direct" mics on the sections, and also single mics for the section leaders.
Ok, so for this use case I don't need MAA.
The numbers and clearly logically thinking about it should have told me, but sometimes excitement gets in the way.
-
MirkoVanHauten MirkoVanHauten https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=376111
- KVRist
- 457 posts since 12 Mar, 2016
Try autoalign from soundradix. Usually gets you exactly and reliably where you need to.
It runs on my machine! Everything else is undefined behavior.
