no thats me AFter the fact of being ganged up on. when you get defensive you might get a bit upset and say some upset things. but tbh, those arent insults are they? they are merely reactions. but now we are going drastically off topic and into semantics..Dirtgrain wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 8:08 pm. . .Masterofdisaster wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 6:59 pm I could insult and make fun also but that's not my style, plus I don't like bullying.
Masterofdisaster wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 6:59 pm And vurt you're literally the poster child of kvr group think. You think you are funny and being sarcastic but you're actually not.It seems to be your style after all.
but for me to make such a blind test i would have to be as good as LFO8 into making two synths sound that identical. im not. so ill just refer to his test, (the one he did honestly). As they sound very very close to being identical yet I can hear (and others can aswell) the difference. What you want is literally just 2 or 3 pages away and to me that is objective and demonstrable. Theres no lack of proof since LFO8 did that already.liquidsound wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 7:34 pmI’m talking about making a blind test yourself in your set up. If your problem is subjective, and by far according to the responses you’re getting seems to be the case, you are going to be miserable with Vital. Get rid of it.Masterofdisaster wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 6:54 pmThe clips themselves are literally just a few seconds. And since LFO8 is such a good sport he left them up all this time.liquidsound wrote: Tue Aug 08, 2023 3:42 pm Just load up a snippet of few seconds and point out where you perceive the problem.
That’s shouldn’t be difficult.
Just curious. Did you do a blind test yourself?
I did few times (with the help of my unwilling wife) for different reasons and it works.
If you honestly can't tell B apart from A, that's cool but don't assume everyone can't.
If it is objective you should be able to demonstrate it. If you can’t, then it’s subjective for lack of proof.
